>
>> From: Rod Whitby
>> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
>> Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 10:07:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt development process
>>
>> The OpenWrt build system is designed by someone who loves Makefiles.
>> The O
next "svn up" would not break your work.
>
>
>
>
>
>- Original Message
> From: Rod Whitby
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 10:07:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt development process
>
>
tby
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 10:07:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt development process
>
> The OpenWrt build system is designed by someone who loves Makefiles.
> The OpenEmbedded build system is designed by someone who
e any of them due to the people, not the technology.
(I use and develop for both OpenWrt and OpenEmbedded)
-- Rod
-Original Message-
From: Stanislav Sinyagin
Date: Friday, Jan 9, 2009 1:18 am
Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt development process
To: OpenWrt Development List Reply-To: Op
Speaking of distributions, T2 is also worth looking at:
http://www.t2-project.org/
I was going to spend some time in learning it deeper, but the Christmas holidays
appeared to be too short :)
- Original Message
> From: Jose Vasconcellos
> I think this topic merits additional discussio
Gregers Petersen wrote:
> Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>>> OpenWrt is described as a Linux distribution for embedded devices.
>>>
>>> (ok. It was a kind of joke, but this is actually the goal of OpenWrt; to
>>> develop a Linux based embedded system for both final solutions and
>>> developm
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> OpenWrt is described as a Linux distribution for embedded devices.
>
>> (ok. It was a kind of joke, but this is actually the goal of OpenWrt; to
>> develop a Linux based embedded system for both final solutions and
>> development)
>
> That begs the question: what's th
Gregers Petersen wrote:
> Hi Jose
>
> Jose Vasconcellos wrote:
>
>> Hello to fellow OpenWrt developers!
>>
>> I would like to start a discussion on how to improve OpenWrt.
>> Part of the problem is that I don't fully understand OpenWrt
>> as an organization. What are its goals?
>>
>>
>
> Op
> OpenWrt is described as a Linux distribution for embedded devices.
> (ok. It was a kind of joke, but this is actually the goal of OpenWrt; to
> develop a Linux based embedded system for both final solutions and
> development)
That begs the question: what's the difference between OpenWRT
and
Hi Jose
Jose Vasconcellos wrote:
> Hello to fellow OpenWrt developers!
>
> I would like to start a discussion on how to improve OpenWrt.
> Part of the problem is that I don't fully understand OpenWrt
> as an organization. What are its goals?
>
OpenWrt is described as a Linux distribution for em
Good idea... I sent in the past some patch (like prof of concenpt)
without receiving any feedback... To have an "official" way for the
third-part patches can only improve the development process.
my 2EuroCent.
ciao
luigi
2009/1/6 Jose Vasconcellos :
> Hello to fellow OpenWrt developers!
>
> I
Hello to fellow OpenWrt developers!
I would like to start a discussion on how to improve OpenWrt.
Part of the problem is that I don't fully understand OpenWrt
as an organization. What are its goals?
It's clear that OpenWrt consists of a core group of developers;
I've gather this because they have
12 matches
Mail list logo
