OpenEmbedded has overlay functionality to allow you to do that. But further discussion of that should be on an OE mailing list, not an OpenWrt one. -- Rod
-----Original Message----- From: Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinya...@yahoo.com> Date: Friday, Jan 9, 2009 7:44 am Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt development process To: OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org>Reply-To: OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> I didn't yet touch T2 deeper than adding it to my bookmarks, but what I >dislike in OpenWRT is that if you need to build a new target, you have >to patch a ton of Makefiles, with the risk that your patches will never >be accepted. > >What would be really cool, is a system that lets you customize every aspect of >building the system, without having to change the distributive >files. Then your local changes would be clearly separated from the files that >came from the upstream, so that the next "svn up" would not break your work. > > > > > >----- Original Message ---- > From: Rod Whitby <r...@whitby.id.au> > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 10:07:00 PM > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt development process > > The OpenWrt build system is designed by someone who loves Makefiles. > The OpenEmbedded build system is designed by someone who despises Makefiles. > T2 seems to be run by someone who despises other open source projects (read > the > website to make your own judgement). > You'll never be able to merge any of them due to the people, not the > technology. > (I use and develop for both OpenWrt and OpenEmbedded) > -- Rod > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stanislav Sinyagin > Date: Friday, Jan 9, 2009 1:18 am > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt development process > To: OpenWrt Development List Reply-To: OpenWrt > Development List > > Speaking of distributions, T2 is also worth looking at: > >http://www.t2-project.org/ > >I was going to spend some time in learning it deeper, but the Christmas > holidays appeared to be too short :) > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ---- > > From: Jose Vasconcellos > > I think this topic merits additional discussion. I'm not very > > familiar with OpenEmbedded but I'm starting to look into it. > > As I see it, OpenEmbedded is trying to create a platform for > > the creating of embedded distributions. OpenWrt is dealing > > with creating a distribution geared towards the specifics of > > routers (networking issues and HW specifics related to that). > > However, the approach of OpenEmbedded looks very good, > > at least, from their documentation. Has anyone compared the > > two build systems approaches? > >_______________________________________________ > >openwrt-devel mailing list > >openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > >http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > >_______________________________________________ >openwrt-devel mailing list >openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
