Good idea... I sent in the past some patch (like prof of concenpt) without receiving any feedback... To have an "official" way for the third-part patches can only improve the development process.
my 2EuroCent. ciao luigi 2009/1/6 Jose Vasconcellos <jva...@verizon.net>: > Hello to fellow OpenWrt developers! > > I would like to start a discussion on how to improve OpenWrt. > Part of the problem is that I don't fully understand OpenWrt > as an organization. What are its goals? > > It's clear that OpenWrt consists of a core group of developers; > I've gather this because they have write priviledges to svn. > What's not obvious is how other developers can help. I think > a set of guidelines that's needs to be developed to define how > contributions are handled. I think transparency is key to > success. > > Of course, OpenWrt is not a commercial venture with deadlines > and deliverables. But some kind of formal organization needs > to be setup for the long term viability of the project. > > Regards, > > Jose > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > -- Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini R&D - Software Industrie Dial Face S.p.A. Via Canzo, 4 20068 Peschiera Borromeo (MI), Italy Tel.: +39 02 5167 2813 Fax: +39 02 5167 2459 web: www.idf-hit.com mail: luigi.mantell...@idf-hit.com _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
