Read what it says: "here are different tars for 32-bit and 64-bit x86
CPU architectures. Make sure that you download the appropriate tar
because the hybrid binary file must be of the appropriate architecture
type"
They don't even give you enough to recompile x86 32 to 64... no way
can this work on
Figured out the magic for the second Ethernet interface. Tested on a
tew-652brp hardware but expecting it should work on the similar
tew-632brp and d-link dir-615 c1.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Gutknecht
---
Index: target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ar71xx/mach-tew-632brp.c
===
Hello. I am respectfully making some noise that developers update
some things for better 802.11n support in OpenWRT. both the b43 and
ath9k driver are working in 802.11n modes but some other pieces of
OpenWRT are bit behind.
1) iw update has a patch: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/4373 - but
pe
Been trying to figure out why for the past 18 hours all my working
with the new chipset support in ATH9K driver was failing... research
says, these are related:
aes_generic: Unknown symbol crypto_unregister_alg
aes_generic: Unknown symbol crypto_register_alg
arc4: Unknown symbol crypto_unregister_
2008/12/19 Bastian Bittorf :
> don't be shy: cat /proc/pci ?
Ok, it has been determined that the problem is that there is no PCI
bus on these routers. They use the AHB bus :) I don't believe ATH9K
driver supports AHB bus yet, but trying to get the madwifi driver
working.
Can anyone please give
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Outback Dingo wrote:
> what about dmesg ???
I also have a Netgear WNR2000 which the factory firmware is based on a
fork of an earlier OpenWRT. I have examined the board on this router
and it has a AR9103 chip on it. I see Andy Boyett has put up some
files on
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Outback Dingo wrote:
> what about dmesg ???
>
> mine has output for
>
> eth0: Atheros AR231x: 00:15:6d:a8:2b:48, irq
> 4
> ar2313_eth_mii:
> probed
> eth0: attached PHY driver [Generic PHY]
> (mii_bus:phy_addr=0:01)
>
> and
>
> ath_hal: module license 'Proprietary
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> * Stephen Gutknecht (hilltx) [19.12.2008 16:45]:
>> r...@openwrt:/# lspci -G
>> Trying method 1..using /sys/bus/pci...OK
>> Decided to use linux-sysfs
>
> don't be shy: cat /proc/pci ?
>
> bye
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Stephen Gutknecht (hilltx)
>
> Download failed.
> --2008-12-19 22:11:13--
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/sources/compat-wireless-2008-12-11.tar.bz2
> Resolving downloads.openwrt.org... 195.56.146.238
> Connecting to downloads.openwrt.org|
Howdy, reporting what I encountered...
/home/OpenWRT4/trunk/scripts/download.pl "/home/OpenWRT4/trunk/dl"
"compat-wireless-2008-12-11.tar.bz2" "unknown"
http://wireless.kernel.org/download/compat-wireless-2.6/
--2008-12-19 22:11:12--
http://wireless.kernel.org/download/compat-wireless-2.6/compat-
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Does lspci work on the box?
>
> wt
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Stephen Gutknecht (hilltx)
> wrote:
>> I'm trying to figure out if ath9k should even work on these chips.
>> I've installed t
Either returns blank on newer OpenWRT or the firmware on it has the
command missing.
Open to suggestions / ideas.
Stephen
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Does lspci work on the box?
>
> wt
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Stephen Gutknecht (h
Yes, I have used it with u-boot to perform a tftp boot of OpenWRT
without touching the flash memory of a router.
Example on the OpenWRT forum:
http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=17975
Really ideal way to test experimental builds.
Stephen
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:23 AM, mike xu wrote
I'm trying to figure out if ath9k should even work on these chips.
I've installed the latest subversion OpenWRT on but none madwifi,
ath5k, and ath9k all fail to recognize the wireless.
Watching the factory firmware, the 2.6.15 kernel booting emits
"Atheros AR9100 WiSoC" message. planex mzk-w300
14 matches
Mail list logo