On Monday 23 June 2008 12:23:45 Acinonyx wrote:
> > From my perspective, using the ticket system would be best. Then I could
> > submit my patch and forget about it afterwards, because I would be
> > notified by mail when someone made changes to the ticket.
>
> This surely helps the developers keep
On Sunday 22 June 2008 00:06:47 RB wrote:
> 1. Non-developers submitting patches would be required to
> additionally submit a ticket for its inclusion; this gets greater
> visibility but somewhat sidesteps the whole community review bit that
> emailing the list has.
>
> 2. One of the developers c
BTW, sorry for posting to the wrong thread. I need to switch to a different
mail agent.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Dear devs,
on Fri Jun 13 21:57:24 CEST 2008, Conrad Hirano wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't mean to offend or insult you and the other developers.
> I realize you all have lives and are busy, and I sincerely appreciate
> the time and effort you have all spent in developing OpenWRT. It's
> just a bit
sorry, mail agent keeps turning on word wrap ...
contents:
- upgrade to vpnc 0.5.1
- disabled building of manpage (would need to run vpnc --help)
- removed start_vpn_nat/stop_vpn_nat functions from vpnc-script (see previous
post)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Ballé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
contents:
- upgrade to vpnc 0.5.1
- disabled building of manpage (would need to run vpnc --help)
- removed start_vpn_nat/stop_vpn_nat functions from vpnc-script (see previous
post)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Ballé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Index: patches/002-vpn_script
Hello,
I just hacked the patches/Makefile for vpnc to support vpnc 0.5.1. This
release is far more usable than 0.4.0, because it fixes one annoying
keep-alive problem and many other bugs.
(see http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/ for a list)
So here's the patch against SVN r10611.
Addit
