Hi Rich,
Basic (v4 only) version of these (as well automatic wan proto detection) was
implemented and rejected some years ago :)
Both are quite easy to do, that version used the following hotplug script:
===
#!/bin/sh
if [ "$INTERFACE" = "wan" ] && [ "$ACTION" = "ifup" ]
then
# Get sub
1 22:17
To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Cc: Imre Kaloz
Subject: [PATCH] mwlwifi: remove target dependency
Users complained that building images for various mvebu Linksys devices
fails when using the ImageBuilder, it complains about the package
'mwlwifi-firmware-88w8964' not being found.
Turns o
untouched until the infra merge.
v2: - dismiss bugtracker and forum change
- update uhttpd cert gen
- update banner
- update busybox NSLOOKUP patch
Signed-off-by: Zoltan HERPAI
Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz
Please find the changes listed in the description, but left it in above
as we
On 2017-06-14 07:43, John Crispin wrote:
On 13/06/17 21:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 05/28/2017 11:56 PM, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
here is a V3 of the remerge proposal, I tried to fold all the comments
people made into it, if anything is missing let me know. Please remeber
that post remerge
On 2017-05-29 13:10, Jamie Stuart wrote:
See another iteration, with:
- correct capitalisation
- antenna to the side (will not work with lowercase ’n’)
- open sans typeface (open source)
- mockups of website header
- accent colours
http://i.imgur.com/ZKtcFXo.png
Nice :) Personally I like the
Hi,
On 2017-05-22 03:10, John Crispin wrote:
On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote:
*) branding
- the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
- a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst
most people said they did not
Well hello there,
On 2017-05-11 12:53, Stijn Segers wrote:
While, like most people, I'm happy progress has been made towards a
re-merge, there still seems quite some passive-agressive behaviour
present coming from certain people championing OpenWrt [1] - which, from
where I stand, seemed one o
On 2017-05-09 18:29, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I’d like to suggest one more action item to this list if I can. It would be
handy to have a single database for user authentication/identification for
submitting bugs, editing the Wiki, etc.
Previously there were too many places where you had
On 2017-05-08 15:43, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
John Crispin writes:
Hi,
Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and discussed
the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would like to propose
and have people vote on.
Great to hear progress is be
Hi Alexey,
On 2017-02-15 11:11, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
From: Alexey Brodkin
On some [especially corporate] networks non-standard ports are blocked
and git is one of them. So switch to more convenient https transport.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin
Please make this a configuration option inst
Hi,
Linksys would like to give away 54 Rango (WRT3200ACM) units. Please use
the relevant post [1] if you want to be one of them.
Cheers,
Imre
[1] https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=344315#p344315
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-d
Hi lynxis,
Please use "OpenWrt / LEDE" if you refer both projects. If only the
second, please stick to "LEDE".
Best,
Imre
On 2016-10-06 17:50, Alexander Couzens wrote:
Hi all,
thanks to the ELCE, a lot of us (OpenWrt LEDE) will be in Berlin next
week.
I would like to invite you to the c-b
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 15:06:18 +0200, Thomas Heil
wrote:
Hi, Kaloz,
On 24.07.2016 00:09, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi Kaloz,
could you please change the ssl certificate. With HSTS it is pretty hard
to circumvent the warning.
If you need any help with issue (money or config) let us kn
like to ask all project members to consider this
invitation as a way to move forward and resolve our issues.
Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau
Signed-off-by: Luka Perkov
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwr
On Fri, 06 May 2016 12:50:32 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
the reboot was not meant to be hostile or disruptive to OpenWrt. we are
just code nerds and messed up the politics of the launch at some places,
which in itself shows one of the reasons that motivated the reboot. the
whole idea is to give
On Thu, 05 May 2016 17:44:43 +0200, Daniel Petre
wrote:
On 05/05/2016 06:38 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
There is plenty of blame to go around, I think. Seems like the Lede
guys should have had the decency to at least inform the Openwrt
leadership privately that they were planning this ven
On Thu, 05 May 2016 18:24:09 +0200, Daniel Dickinson
wrote:
On 16-05-05 12:21 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
[snip]
> The changes that the Lede guys are suggesting would be welcome,
but
> splitting the project and community with an ugly fork is very
much not
> welcome.
Let'
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:09:15 +0200, John Crispin
wrote:
On 26/04/2016 13:07, Imre Kaloz wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:00:40 +0200, John Crispin
wrote:
On 26/04/2016 12:59, Imre Kaloz wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:55:50 +0200, John Crispin
wrote:
the maintainer of the target does
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:00:40 +0200, John Crispin
wrote:
On 26/04/2016 12:59, Imre Kaloz wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:55:50 +0200, John Crispin
wrote:
the maintainer of the target does not use patchwork. so they are not
applicable to be listed in patchwork. sorry i normally send an
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:55:50 +0200, John Crispin
wrote:
the maintainer of the target does not use patchwork. so they are not
applicable to be listed in patchwork. sorry i normally send an email to
the submitter informing him of this. i forgot to do so last night
"the maintainer" was told to
Hi Adrian,
On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 01:48:22 +0200, Adrian Panella
wrote:
Hi Imre,
networking seems to be working for me.
So far I have done only basic testing. Can access the router from lan
and wlan.
No permormance test done, though.
If you have a repo you can share with your patchset, I could
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 15:26:46 +0200, Chris Blake
wrote:
Hey Imre,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 03:46:09 +0200, Chris Blake
+CONFIG_BLUESTONE=y
I doubt we support that here.
From my understanding, Bluestone is the dev board for
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 03:46:10 +0200, Chris Blake
wrote:
This patch adds support for the Meraki MR24 Access point to the apm821xx
target. More info on the device can be found at
https://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/meraki/mr24
Signed-off-by: Chris Blake
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/apm821xx/dt
Hi Chris,
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 03:46:09 +0200, Chris Blake
wrote:
This adds a new target for PowerPC APM821xx (464-based) boards, as well
as adds support for the booke-wdt watchdog package.
Signed-off-by: Chris Blake
Not bad at all for first try :)
diff --git a/include/target.mk b/include
Hi Adrian,
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 02:35:20 +0200, Adrian Panella
wrote:
From: Adrian Panella
This patchset adds support for the Linksys AC2600 EA8500 router.
Does networking work for you? I have a patchset for the ea8500 I didn't
push because of that.
Thanks,
Imre
_
Hi,
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:19:36 +0200, Chris Blake
wrote:
Yep, currently my apm821xx target on the repo is based on the 4.4
kernel, and has a few small patches in place for the ar8035 NIC, and a
patch for fixing the Crypto driver for the apm821xx hardware. [0]
Did you try to send these u
Hi Chris,
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:00:19 +0200, Chris Blake
wrote:
Quick Question about the ppc44x target. I am currently working on
porting over a PowerPC Device that uses the APM821XX SoC (464-based)
but the closest current target would be ppc44x, which seems to be a
bit outdated and lacks
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 21:09:35 +0100, John Crispin
wrote:
On 18/03/2016 21:02, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 18 March 2016 at 19:36, John Crispin wrote:
On 18/03/2016 18:19, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
On 18 March 2016 at 15:32, John Crispin wrote:
please use this svn server for now. it will be
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 03:40:25 +0100, Shankar Unni
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Karl Vogel wrote:
Doesn't look like the SVN server is back yet either.
Are there any plans to resurrect the anon SVN server? Or should
everybody
move to git.openwrt.org instead?
Yeah, I've been
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 11:35:42 +0100, Hannu Nyman wrote:
Ps. the updated downloads.openwrt.org works only half of the time.
Roughly every second time the page load fails (until yesterday with 503
error from nginx, today silently with empty page)
It works 100% of the time. You do 15+ concurre
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:32:06 +0100, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
* Daniel Curran-Dickinson [23.12.2015
17:27]:
I'm implementing without mount_root - that means passwordless
failsafe unless user has preconfigured passwords in their image.
OTOH if they have configured passwords in their image then
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:27:37 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2015-12-23 16:27, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
* Imre Kaloz [23.12.2015 16:22]:
>I'd hate to have some corner case result in bricked routers for
>people who have no means of recovering from a bad flash.
You can refla
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 14:12:00 +0100, Tathagata Das
wrote:
- r7500)
+ r7500 |\
+ d7800)
nand_do_platform_check $board $1
return $?;
;;
@@ -21,7 +22,8 @@
case "$board" in
AP148 |\
- r7500)
+ r7500 |\
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 13:43:14 +0100, Daniel Dickinson
wrote:
Oh, and I think that initially this should be default off configuration
option that people who are able to flash firmware via bootloader in case
of getting locked out encourage to test before pushing this as default.
I'd hate to
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:58:59 +0100, Daniel Dickinson
wrote:
I am reworking this (requiring console login) as couple of packages for
the packages feed, although it may require an image.mk or packages
Makefile hook in order to embed an appropriate inittab into the image
(since
On Sat, 07 Nov 2015 03:29:07 +0100, Claudio Leite
wrote:
This patch set reworks support for the Linksys EA3500 and EA4500,
integrating significant amounts of code from the WRT1900AC port.
Previously these two routers were supported by flashing from the
bootloader and setting new boot command
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:50:41 +0100, John Crispin
wrote:
This is where your good intentions likely will yield bad results.
intentionally breaking the license/law is not "good intentions" the fact
that he used a anonymous remailer just shows that he knew what he was
doing is wrong.
Agreed
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:46:00 +0200, Sorin Burjan
wrote:
Hello Kaloz,
is there any initiative to create a non-profit organization ?
We're looking into this as well other options ;)
Imre
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwr
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:33:35 +0200, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
It should be easy possible to get funding from all the companies which
work with OpenWrt. Is this in option?
Not until we have a nonprofit organization as companies can't have tax
deduction in exchange.. This is pretty much the ma
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:02:07 +0200, Felix Kaechele
wrote:
Hi list,
within the Freifunk project in Germany we currently use very low cost
thin-clients (FSC Futro S550) for VPN offloading.
Those thin-clients have an internal CF card (1GB) attached to the
chipset's PATA controller that uses
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:09:14 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2015-08-07 18:50, Mathieu Olivari wrote:
Actually, I was asking myself the same questions yesterday. I was
leaning
towards dts for the reasons you mention below as well; the problem is
on ref
designs, there is no "standard" layout.
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:24:30 +0200, Piotr Dymacz wrote:
For some boards in ramips (and other targets) naming scheme for LEDs is:
"manufacturer:color:led-name", but there are many other boards which
don't
follow this approach.
The upstream convention is "device:color:led-name". So actually,
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:11:28 +0200, Martin Blumenstingl
wrote:
Hi Imre,
On the dgl5500 the mac in the eeprom is the same on all devices (and
iirc
it's the default mac the firmware also uses). Patching it to the right
one
in the firmware file is what happens in 82_patch_ath10k.
I am not
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 20:59:19 +0200, Matti Laakso
wrote:
On 22/06/15 20:19, Matti Laakso wrote:
>/ These patches backport the new FW API v5 to ath10k
/>/ (upstream commits 8348db2, 53513c3, and dc3632a)
/>/ and change mac
On Sun, 24 May 2015 01:51:51 +0200, Daniel Golle
wrote:
Update kernel sources and refresh some patches.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle
Commited as 45761.
Thanks,
Imre
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.o
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:56:31 +0200, Daniel Golle
wrote:
Linux 4.0 was released on 2014-04-12
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle
Merged in 45559 with refreshing the patches.
Thanks,
Imre
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:51:11 +0200, wrote:
i am really wondering if the core devs are following this or even give a
damn. didn't read anything after John's last mail declaring Dirty
Diamond the winner. Felix, John, anybody?
Well, given I'm the one to blame for all the older names except fo
On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 12:54:53 +0200, bkil
wrote:
+1 on Designated Driver. Migrating or upgrading to OpenWrt is the
sober choice. I didn't find the other two meaningful or relevant.
I think community polls should be organized in two phases. The first
one should gather ideas, while the second o
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 03:28:23 +0100, Ian Kent wrote:
I think the process is that we should send changes to the component
maintainer, cc OpenWrt-devel, since maintainers might miss the post.
Imre, is this change acceptable, what other changes are needed, should
Pat re-submit this afresh or is
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:28:44 +0100, Daniel Golle
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle
---
include/kernel-version.mk | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
A bit hard to think no patches {generic,target} needs refreshing ;) Please
send a v2 with those inclu
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 02:20:21 +0100, Claudio Leite
wrote:
This sets 'enable_vlan' and thus uses 802.1q
VLANs, but without tagging on either interface.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite
Committed as 44509.
Thanks,
Imre
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 15:17:14 +0100, Claudio Leite
wrote:
Toggles the LA bit on the WAN interface.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite
Merged in 44508.
Thanks,
Imre
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 02:01:14 +0100, Mathieu Olivari
wrote:
This will simplify the boot process by avoiding the bootloader
bootargs configuration process.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Olivari
---
...
++ chosen {
++ bootargs = "console=ttyMSM0,115200 root=/dev/mtdblock12
rootfstype=squa
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:18:56 +0100, Claudio Leite
wrote:
The VID header offset must be specified explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite
Added with some more explanation in the commit log as r44455.
Thanks,
Imre
___
openwrt-devel mailing lis
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:43:38 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
In order for the image to be built, some patches need to be ported to
3.19.
Add the relevant patches. Note that most of them (if not all) should be
merged
in 3.20, removing the need to carry them on then.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ri
Hi Maxime,
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:36:58 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
It builds up on that to then introduce support for two Armada
385-based evaluations boards from Marvell.
Let me know what you think,
Maxime
Thanks for taking time to do this right :) I've merged them, and except
for
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:06:03 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
Sure, but please implement UBI on NOR as a generic solution.
What do you mean? It already works quite well (with that patch applied
and the NOR sub-profile), so I'm not sure I have to implement
anything, be it generic or not.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:33:14 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 01:37:37PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:43:25PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 13 January 2015 at 16:56, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > Some devices out there only have a NOR flash
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:52:05 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
Dear Imre Kaloz,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:38:47 +0100, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> Separated from what? The rest of the serie? This patch is pretty
> standalone by itself.
Sorry, I wanted to say that one patch should add the part
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:23:43 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
Hi Imre,
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:50:55PM +0100, Imre Kaloz wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:56:45 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
>++ partition@2 {
>++
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:05:33 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
Linksys/Belking marketing is again doing one thing and saying another?
This time they say that WRT1200AC router is open source:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/ces-2015-linksys-1200ac-an-inexpensive-open-source-802-11ac-wi-fi-
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:18:13 +0100, mark milburn
wrote:
I believe this is the appropriate forum for discussing this. Let me
know if this is not the case.
I think that employing the syscfg partition as the overlayfs is not
useful for this device, and for at least one case, harmful
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:36:16 +0100, Eric Schultz
wrote:
Malta ramdisk images are no longer copied to output due to a recent
change.
This change reimplements copying of ramdisk images for Malta builds.
Merged in r43970, thank you.
Imre
___
open
Hi Maxime,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:56:41 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
+$(eval $(call MultiProfile,Generic,$(PROFILES_LIST)))
+$(eval $(call MultiProfile,Evalboards,$(PROFILES_LIST)))
Profile names should be sourced from the profiles.
- $(foreach nandboard,$(NANDBOARDS),$(call
BuildSysupg
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:56:46 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
+diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-db-ap.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-db-ap.dts
+index 02db04867d8f..2a58443e2504 100644
+--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-db-ap.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-db-ap.dts
+@@ -13
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:56:45 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
++ partition@2 {
++ label = "data";
++ reg = <0x60 0xa0>;
++ };
+
Maxime,
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:56:40 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
Some devices out there only have a NOR flash to store the rootfs on.
While using UBI is arguable on this kind of NAND, this is something that
should
be supported.
Could you explain me, why would we want that? For NOR we
/Makefile
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ CPU_TYPE:=cortex-a9
CPU_SUBTYPE:=vfpv3
MAINTAINER:=Imre Kaloz
-KERNEL_PATCHVER:=3.14
+KERNEL_PATCHVER:=3.18
include $(INCLUDE_DIR)/target.mk
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org
Thanks, applied in 43969.
Imre
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:56:39 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
The mvebu image makefile define something almost identical to the generic
implementation found in include/image.mk.
Switch to this implementation.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
target/linux/mveb
Thanks, applied in 43968.
Imre
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:56:38 +0100, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
The mvebu image Makefile directly calls the padjffs2 utility, while
there's an
generic make function to do just that. Switch to it
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
target/linux/mvebu/image/Makefil
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 20:10:28 +0100, Fernando Frediani
wrote:
I have just upgraded it with your firmware. Works fine so far for most
of things. Actually some stuff is better than before.
Glad to hear that :)
I will proceed with more tests, specially the ones I had been doing and
reported ba
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:36:40 +0100, Fernando Frediani
wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone here have a Linksys WRT1900AC (that fiasco that suppose to
be the new generation of WRT54G) ?
I got one a while ago and have been following the firmware development
for it directly with Belkin people and on
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 05:07:33 +0100, Mark Milburn
wrote:
This is a 3.14.x backport of:
"mvneta: Fix TSO and checksum for non-acceleration vlan traffic"
Fixes vlan tagging on SoC interfaces for the WRT1900AC. Useful
when using mvsw6171 driver.
Here's hoping I didn't foul up the patch format t
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:06:27 +0100, Gergely Kiss wrote:
Please don't top-post.
Sorry, I haven't read that post earlier.
So, is this simply about mounting an additional UBIFS partition at boot time?
If so, I believe the best solution would be to extend the
functionality of fstab with a simple
Hi,
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:59:25 +0200, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
This patch adds a new profile for the Mirabox, and fixes a few things
along the way, mostly because of the Mirabox NAND page size that
differs from the other mvebu boards (and most of the boards supported
by OpenWRT apparently).
A
Hi,
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:10:25 +0200, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
This is the second version of my rather big changes to support the
3.16 kernel, and more specifically on the mvebu SoCs.
Thanks for looking into this :) I already had some work done for the same, I'll
take a look and merge it w
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:51:10 +0200, Dirk Neukirchen
wrote:
On 09.10.2014 15:00, William Haynes wrote:
I've been developing a x86_64 bit system during the release candidates.
Now that the final is released, x86_64 is not an option anymore. Is there
a possibility of getting this added back or
John,
Please mind your manners and keep the discussion at a professional level. I
doubt Etienne wanted to insult you or criticize your work, and it's true that
we did not announce of the availability of final binaries yet.
Imre
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:30:41 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
no i
Hi Claudio,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:10:17 +0200, Claudio Thomas
wrote:
The RB600/RB300 uses a MPC8377, the XM1700 uses a MPC8306. They are
quite similar, but not equal.
Well, RB333 is MPC8321, RB600 is MPC8323 and we support the MPC8377EWLAN board,
which is MPC8377E :)
The main problem
Hi Claudio,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:44:03 +0200, Claudio Thomas
wrote:
I would like to add a new device to /target/linux/mpc83xx witch needs a
special kernel.
In what way is it special? Why can't the same kernel support your board as well?
Last time you've said you are going to re-analyse t
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 09:10:24 -0700, Michael Richardson
wrote:
José Vázquez wrote:
>> José Vázquez wrote: > According to the info i
>> could find the cpu is a 400MHz arm1176 > (ARMv6k) with VFP and C55x
>> DSP for VoIP, that runs in big endian mode; > seems that shares some
>
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:34:49 +0200, Claudio Thomas
wrote:
Hi, as reaction of the following email:
On 15.07.2014 15:05, Claudio Thomas wrote:
Subject: [OpenWrt-Devel] When to use Target Profile or Subtarget
Hi,
I'm adapting the "Freescale MPC83xx" platform, so that multiple devices
can b
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:28:25 +0200, valent.turko...@gmail.com
wrote:
Another confirmation that they have switched boards and probably also
SoC, from Ubnt forums:
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-General-Discussion/Differencens-between-XM-XW-and-TI-firmwares/td-p/752296/page/2
So nobody fr
On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:54:33 +0200, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
because i was getting a lot of private mails regarding the inside,
here are some pictures. i will get better ones, if the photograph
next to me is in the office again 8-)
http://www.intercity-vpn.de/files/edimax-1101w/
(upload is in p
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:39:04 +0200, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
why is it marked as 'broken'? i just compiled it with
trunk r40422/kernel 3.10.34 and it boots fine.
Because no one tested it since the kernel has been upgraded, and we don't have
a board to do anymore ;)
Imre
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:31:48 +0100, Jiri Slachta wrote:
Hi,
almost the same patch submitted a while ago was rejected. I do not think your
patch will be accepted, see:
http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/4832/
Jiri
On March 26, 2014 6:16:44 PM CET, Darren Lissimore
wrote:
I needed to add
John,
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 16:21:35 +0100, John Szakmeister
wrote:
I'm looking to add support for a board into OpenWRT, and I'm curious
you guys so neatly split the configuration between the top-level, the
architecture, and the boards. It's an ARM-based board and we plan on
using device tree.
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:50:15 +0100, Alexandru Ardelean
wrote:
Seems that the x86_64 build of OpenWRT hangs on boot in KVM and QEMU.
After looking over the 'target/linux/x86_64' folder in comparison with
'target/linux/x86' I've narrowed it down to just these 2 options
that have to explicitly be
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:38:19 +0100, Nathan Hintz wrote:
Set ARCH=arm in target/linux/ixp4xx/Makefile
There are virtually zero LE ixp4xx devices out there, and this config doesn't
even support those, only ones where the secondary bootloader swaps endianness
before booting the kern
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:45:59 +0200, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:55:29AM +0200, Alina Friedrichsen wrote:
Könnt ihr bitte einen Warnung im Wiki anbringen, dass der Router extrem
empfindlich gegenüber Lötwasser ist? Mir sind dutzende Router
abgeraucht, weil ich zu viel Lötwa
Hello Tim,
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:13:52 +0200, Tim Harvey wrote:
Thanks for reviewing Imre! I'll submit a follow patch after a few days if
there is more discussion.
Okay, I'll help cleaning up that one as well, so we can minimize the changes to
be reviewed.
Some other areas that may ne
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 05:43:03 +0200, Tim Harvey wrote:
This adds support for a new target architecture: i.MX61
This is based on the current 3.8.6 kernel with the following additions:
- PCIe Root Complex driver supporting bridge transactions and MSI
- DeviceTree support for Gateworks Ventana
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:03:15 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2013/4/3 Imre Kaloz :
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:45:01 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
3.3 has been chosen as AA was meant to be released those days..
Well, so it seems we assumed two things:
1) AA quick release, according to the plan
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:45:01 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
3.3 has been chosen as AA was meant to be released those days..
Well, so it seems we assumed two things:
1) AA quick release, according to the plan
2) BB release quick enough to replace AA before 3.3 gets EOL
I'm afraid both assumpt
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:08:53 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
2013/4/3 Bastian Bittorf :
* sylvain roger rieunier [03.04.2013 09:08]:
maybe it'is a stupid question, but some one why Openwrt didn't use LTS
kernel like in
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
At the
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:45:38 +0100, Florian Fainelli
wrote:
On 02/25/2013 11:05 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:29:20 +0100, Maarten Bezemer
wrote:
It seems that Imre Kaloz (the target maintainer) is not available?
Is it possible that the patch gets reviewed/committed by
Hi,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:29:20 +0100, Maarten Bezemer
wrote:
It seems that Imre Kaloz (the target maintainer) is not available?
Is it possible that the patch gets reviewed/committed by someone else?
Orion will be moved to DT, so 3.7 support won't be commited at all.
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:46:18 +0100, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
* Imre Kaloz [04.01.2013 16:27]:
I'm fine with the idea but not the way you did it, because if you're "serial
attached" this gets annoying quite fast. Although we could make this a config option
and do all kin
Hi,
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:57:56 +0100, Bastian Bittorf
wrote:
oops=panic panic=10 / panic_on_oom=1
Reply-To:
X-Editor: vi http://ex-vi.sourceforge.net/
In our production networks we had issues that some device needed
a manual restart, because there where hanging/panic/oopsing during
boot-ti
Thanks, merged it in r34132.
Imre
On Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:46:46 +0100, Tim Harvey wrote:
Combine two pcie patches (2nd patch undid the 1st patch) together
and refresh the other affected patches
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey
---
.../patches-3.3/055-cns3xxx_pci_iospace_init.patch | 76
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
