Re: [PATCH master,23.05] ramips: fix ZyXEL NR7101 bricking typo

On 15.10.2023 21:59, Paul D wrote: This needs to be applied to 23.05 and master ASAP.  It is already bricking devices. how about quickly removing the erroneous image from https://downloads.openwrt.org/releases/23.05.0/ plus adding a prominent red NOTE on https://openwrt.org/toh/zyxel/nr7101

Re: Override MAC address for interface?

On 23.02.2023 13:49, Peter Naulls wrote: On 2/23/23 01:43, Rafał Miłecki wrote: On 22.02.2023 21:02, Peter Naulls wrote: config device option 'lan1' This line is clearly wrong. See how you specify device name in above section. Perhaps it is "clear" but there's much in OpenWrt t

Re: sysupgrade broken on imx nand targets (and maybe others too)

On 24.01.2023 17:13, Lanchon wrote: the problem lies elsewhere: on your platform something is rebooting the system asynchronously while it is updating. this is very dangerous and must be fixed elsewhere in code. just a wild guess. faulty power supplies sometimes lead to reboots if the power

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] coreutils: Import from packages feed

On 08.01.2023 00:02, Thibaut wrote: Le 7 janv. 2023 à 22:41, Robert Marko a écrit : On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 at 16:26, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: Le 7 janv. 2023 à 15:06, Christian Marangi a écrit : On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:49:44PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: I need to express a per-target de

Re: [sdwalker/sdwalker.github.io] 2bdb42: This week's update

is the below weekly message of any informational value to _all_? can someone maybe block this if it's not? ..thanks ede On 08.05.2022 23:05, Stephen Walker via openwrt-devel wrote: The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the ori

Re: [PATCH 2/4] base-files/functions.sh: do not iterate over ls

On 20.09.2020 07:31, Rosen Penev wrote: > - for file in $(ls $1/*.sh 2>/dev/null); do > - . $file > + for file in "$1"/*.sh; do > + [ -e "$file" ] || break > + . "$file" the existence check is probably meant to catch "../*.sh" entry found if no files ma

[OpenWrt-Devel] time for OJ 1.15 everyone?

new year, new OJ. start of the year is OJ release time traditionally by now. are we in agreement? a snappy new NY to one and all ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-dev

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [JPP-Devel] Fwd: SVN: [6214] core/trunk

On 06.01.2020 12:37, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Hi Ede, > > I did a quick try and it seems to work fine. > Seems that the change you did is rather big. I'll try to go deeper into your > change to try to understand. go ahead :) > What about the SO remark > (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1884

[OpenWrt-Devel] test

___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v1 1/1] openssh: disable passwords for openssh server

hey All, On 2/15/2018 20:50, Magnus Kroken wrote: >>> This is just about the default configuration, it's not a choice between >>> conflicting compile time options with varying security implications. While >>> key authentication may be best practice, allowing SSH password logins isn't >>> on the

[OpenWrt-Devel] international keyboard layout support

hey All, while tinkering with Gluon the Openwrt based Freifunk firmware (currently on CC) on a x86 based thin client box i needed support for a german keyboard layout. i managed to realize that manually as i didn't find any prepared packages for this purpose. is there any interest in a keyboar

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uclient-fetch & SSL WAS:Re: DD: CONFIG_BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_WGET is not set

thx John! neat.. that should do the trick. finally a small ssl capable wget, jippee! ..ede On 22.01.2016 22:32, John Clark wrote: > There is a symbolic link: > > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root13 Jan 22 20:04 wget -> > uclient-fetch* > > > On 1/22/16 4:29 PM, edgar.sol...@web.de wro

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uclient-fetch & SSL WAS:Re: DD: CONFIG_BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_WGET is not set

On 22.01.2016 16:20, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2016-01-22 16:03, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> On 22.01.2016 14:32, Weedy wrote: Question: The busybox binary (for me) goes from 366,401 bytes to 300,327 >>> with the removal of wget from it. Therefore, the uclient-fetch binary >>> swapout cause

[OpenWrt-Devel] uclient-fetch & SSL WAS:Re: DD: CONFIG_BUSYBOX_DEFAULT_WGET is not set

On 22.01.2016 14:32, Weedy wrote: >> Question: The busybox binary (for me) goes from 366,401 bytes to 300,327 > with the removal of wget from it. Therefore, the uclient-fetch binary > swapout causes a 46,379 byte increase in size. I assume the desire to move > to uclient-fetch from busybox is for

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition / paid patch-checking

On 13.10.2015 12:44, Imre Kaloz wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:33:35 +0200, Bastian Bittorf > wrote: > > > >> It should be easy possible to get funding from all the companies which >> work with OpenWrt. Is this in option? > > Not until we have a nonprofit organization as companies can't have

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Renaming trunk to Dxx Dxx ? Or seperate name for Trunk?

How about Trusty Trunk.. no cocktail though.. so far.. ede On 10.09.2015 22:08, Tobias Welz wrote: > Just following up with the T... T... idea - I found some T T Cocktails: > > Tahitian Tea > Tahitian Treat > Tanqueray Tonic > Tanzanian Tonic > > > > Am 09.09.2015 um 19:57 schrieb Hannu Nyman

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v4] base-files: add /etc/profile.d support

On 04.09.2015 13:55, Karl Palsson wrote: > Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >> Hi. > >>> Why the -e? You only got existing files in the glob above right? > >> Almost. If the directory does not exist or is empty then the glob >> pattern is returned literally, e.g. "echo /tmp/*" will expand to a list >> o

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v4] base-files: add /etc/profile.d support

On 04.09.2015 12:36, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > * edgar.sol...@web.de [04.09.2015 12:30]: >> note from a bystander. this looks wrong - path/file names containing spaces >> will be delimited by for. probably better use > > for the sent patch this works: > > root@box:~ touch "A 1" > root@box:~ touch

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v4] base-files: add /etc/profile.d support

On 04.09.2015 11:51, karlp wrote: > include() { > local file > > for file in $(ls $1/*.sh 2>/dev/null);

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Combine CA-certificates in one file

On 12.06.2015 21:20, micke.p...@telldus.se wrote:> 2015-06-12 09:39 skrev Cristian Morales Vega: > >> On 12 June 2015 at 08:30, wrote: >> >>> Some packages or libraries cannot use split ca cetificates in a folder. >>> This adds a config to combine all certificates into one file. >> >> I have not

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] wrong configured spam-filter for openwrt-dev

On 30.04.2015 12:48, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > while sending a mail to openwrt-dev, > i got this answer, which doesnt make any sense, > because the list only accepts "registered" users anyway: > > : host mail.openwrt.org[78.24.191.176] > said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [176.9.57.13

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Dark Destroyer

On 08.04.2015 00:45, David Lang wrote: > On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Peter Lawler wrote: > >> On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote: >> >>> Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "Dark Destroyer". >> How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for >> anything else. > > There ar

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Dark Destroyer

On 08.04.2015 00:33, Peter Lawler wrote: > On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote: > >> Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer "Dark Destroyer". > How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for > anything else. > simply write your vote in the subject and have a mail bo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

hmm.. seems like all doodle polls, incl. the original one suffer from this weakness. hereby i declare defeat and hope you Hartmut will count the votes properly, manually as seems necessary. +1 for Designated Driver ..ede PS: i will deactivate the flawed doodle poll now > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 a

[OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt DD release name v2

ok, took the freedom to set up another vote, incl. the third option. let's see what the numbers say in a few days. http://doodle.com/9d262b569bh4r7kv it'd make sense that everybody retakes the vote to have the truest election result. regards ..ede __

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt release name

On 06.04.2015 09:35, John Crispin wrote: > i think we have a winner with 96 vs 50 votes. > >> == Dirty Diamond == >> 2 cl Rum >> 2 cl Vodka >> 2 cl Tequila Silver >> 2 cl Campari >> 2 cl Curaçao Blue >> 2 cl Lime syrup >> 2 1/2 cl Orange juice >> Coca Cola i also

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [packages] dnsmasq: add option --quiet-dhcp

On 07.01.2015 23:50, Lars Kruse wrote: > > The --quiet-dhcp setting increases privacy by omitting DHCP lease logs > including MAC addresses. > > Signed-off-by: Lars Kruse > > --- a/package/network/services/dnsmasq/files/dnsmasq.init > +++ b/package/network/services/dnsmasq/files/dnsmasq.init >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Help, how to troubleshoot openwrt crash(reboot)

On 11.10.2014 20:40, document wrote: > hi, > > how to troubleshoot openwrt crash(reboot) ? > > i have openvpn-2.3.2 installed from opkg but when i manually start it about > 1min passed, router (openwrt-12.09) will reboot. > > when i enabled openvpn service on startup, router will auto reboot fo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] dnsmasq: DNSSEC support

On 16.06.2014 11:56, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:53 AM, wrote: >>> On the contrary I'd prefer if it doesn't. Nettle is an open project >>> under LGPL that anyone can contribute and can be reused by a variety >>> of software; polarssl is closed commercial project un

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] dnsmasq: DNSSEC support

On 16.06.2014 10:40, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Steven Barth wrote: >> > Hi Nikos, >> > Is there a reason for not having dnssec by default? If there is a way >> > to disable it, I believe it will only be beneficial to have it in. >> > The main problem here i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] how to set busybox's some options now ?

On 17.12.2013 16:14, Yousong Zhou wrote: > On 17 December 2013 22:13, openwrt-de...@couprie.net > wrote: >> Hi yousong, >> >> Can you give a example how to call menuconfig for busybox ? > > I am doing menuconfig for busybox in OpenWrt build environment in > which busybox tarball has already been

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Question on UCI Lua license

On 13.08.2013 21:54, Jeff Remy wrote: > Hi, > I have a question regarding the UCI Lua bindings license. > libuci itself is LGPLv2.1, the cli utility is GPLv2 and the Lua > bindings are GPLv2. > I was wondering if this was on purpose? > It does not seem to be in line with the library but again, ther

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Iozone openwrt package

On 31.05.2013 13:48, devendra.aaru wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Bastian Bittorf > wrote: >> * devendra.aaru [31.05.2013 13:44]: >>> The patch i generated spans upto 1M as since it contains the source >>> code of iozone and i bit modified it since it doesn't compile (aio.h >>> and as

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] TP-Link TL-WR841ND to replace WRT54GL?

On 06.03.2013 19:40, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:33:44PM +0100, a...@mykolab.com wrote: >> The TL-WR841ND may very well be a good choice. You can also consider >> the TL-WR1043ND, it has solid support (I have had about four of them and >> tested rather heavily over t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Maintainer address not reachable [Was: [PATCH] net/freeswitch: Make upstream-defaults package installable]

On 27.02.2013 15:33, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hello, > > On 01/31/2013 09:11 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I just got a mailer daemon notice that open...@slickdeals.endjunk.com >> didn't get this mail because the mail server for its domain couldn't be >> connected by mine. >> >> Who

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Compiling custom kernel for latest trunk

On 15.01.2013 16:41, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > Le 12/01/2013 16:08, darius a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> Simple question for those who know. I do 'make kernel_menuconfig' then >> select some needed features in kernel and then do 'make -j3' in topdir. >> After image is done, I install it on the router

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Initial support for Mikrotik RB751G-2HnD and RB751U-2HnD

this is different from client to client. if unsure or unable to fix it simply attach the patch to the email. this way it will survive whatever comes. people on this mailing list like the patches inline for commenting, but heck.. if it does not work out for you, simply attach it (for usage) *and*

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

hadn't seen it. yes, different build dir should work. thanks ..ede On 19.03.2012 15:05, Peter Wagner wrote: > both packaes are build in a sepreate folders > so yes - you can select both packages. > > But you can also building both and testing it ;) > > /Peter > On Monday 19 March 2012 13:24:24

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

had a look at irssi. does this actually work when both packages are selected? don't you end up with two packages both containing whatever was build first? ..ede On 19.03.2012 13:18, Peter Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > look at the ctorrent or irssi Makefile. There you can see how to implement > the

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

Maybe you are lucky and someone steps up. You are probably better of finding the maintainer (if there's one) directly by looking at the revision log or asking in the openwrt irc channel. The mailing list is often slow in this regard. If it all does not happen in time frame you planned in then yo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] lighttpd-nossl

On 19.03.2012 10:52, Christiane Ruetten wrote: > Hi, > > would you be able to easily add a variant of the lighttpd > package without the massive libopenssl dependency? It is almost > completely filling up the flash in 4 MByte routers, leaving > almost no headroom for further functionality, and ht

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] parted and EFI_PARTITION=y

On 29.02.2012 14:16, cl...@bit63.org wrote: > Quoting edgar.sol...@web.de: > ... >> more along the lines of >> >> ... >> >> define Package/parted >> SECTION:=utils >> CATEGORY:=Utilities >> SUBMENU:=disc >> DEFAULT:=n >> TITLE:=GNU Parted manipulates par

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] parted and EFI_PARTITION=y

> Quoting edgar.sol...@web.de: > >> On 29.02.2012 12:24, cl...@bit63.org wrote: >>> In this case I am not sure what the best course of action is. >>> What is the OpenWRT way to enable kernel options that aren't kernel modules? >> >> you can add a simple config var to your Makefile, like >> CONFIG

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] parted and EFI_PARTITION=y

On 29.02.2012 12:24, cl...@bit63.org wrote: > In this case I am not sure what the best course of action is. > What is the OpenWRT way to enable kernel options that aren't kernel modules? you can add a simple config var to your Makefile, like CONFIG_KERNEL_*=y these are automatically translated t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WBMR-HP-G300H flash image for flashing from original FW?

On 23.02.2012 19:21, John Crispin wrote: > dd-wrt webif on openwrt? ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] reaver-wps package Makefile available

for the unaware http://code.google.com/p/reaver-wps/ somebody created a package Makefile for reaver in the forum https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=152639 ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Help -- Noob Question -- Driving Me Crazy

On 11.11.2011 20:51, Mike Brady wrote: Can someone tell be or direct me to an example of how to put a linux version conditional into an OpenWrt package Makefile please? What I want to do is say "if this is and version of Linux 2.4 then do stufft". I've tried something like ifeq ($(CONFIG_LINU

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt GPL compliance

On 20.09.2011 13:56, bifferos wrote: > > I'd like to provide a binary build of OpenWrt packages, however I want to > comply with the terms of the GPL. I figured the most obvious thing to do > would be to copy the way OpenWrt does things. I'm not convinced that OpenWrt > complies with the GPL

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt GPL compliance

On 20.09.2011 14:33, bifferos wrote: > So how do I know what version of packages was pulled in at the time of > building? I can assume the package source itself ends up in the 'dl' > directory, so I can back that up so I have the pristine package source, but > what about the patch set that was

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] replace CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE with CONFIG_PREEMPT

On 02.09.2011 12:39, Luka Perkov wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 10:46:37AM +0200, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On Friday 02 September 2011 00:55:54 Luka Perkov wrote: >>> Also in linux-2.6.39.4/kernel/Kconfig.preempt you will see for >>> CONFIG_PREEMPT: >>> >>> Select this if you are b

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

On 29.08.2011 18:17, Luka Perkov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:32:10PM +0200, Jan Willies wrote: >> 2011/8/29 >>> right missed that. and yes reversing would be most elegant. ede > > I don't see why reversing would be most elegant. Now you can fully tweak > your openvpn package. > you miss

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

On 29.08.2011 17:14, Jonas Gorski wrote: > On 29 August 2011 17:04, wrote: >> On 29.08.2011 16:44, Jan Willies wrote: >>> 2011/8/29 mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de>> >>> >>> On 29.08.2011 16 :14, Jan Willies wrote: >>> > Hi Luka, >>> > >>> > 2011/8/21 Luka Perkov >>

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

On 29.08.2011 16:44, Jan Willies wrote: > 2011/8/29 mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de>> > > On 29.08.2011 16 :14, Jan Willies wrote: > > Hi Luka, > > > > 2011/8/21 Luka Perkov >> > > >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][PACKAGE] upgrade openvpn package

On 29.08.2011 16:14, Jan Willies wrote: > Hi Luka, > > 2011/8/21 Luka Perkov mailto:open...@lukaperkov.net>> > > define Package/openvpn > SECTION:=net > CATEGORY:=Network > + SUBMENU:=VPN > DEPENDS:=+kmod-tun +libopenssl +PACKAGE_openvpn_complzo:liblzo > > > The lzo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/1] kmod-input-xxx: missing dependency on kmod-input-core

On 27.07.2011 17:57, Philip Prindeville wrote: > On 7/27/11 4:19 AM, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: >> Hi. >> >>> - KCONFIG:=CONFIG_INPUT_EVDEV >>> + KCONFIG:=CONFIG_INPUT_EVDEV +kmod-input-core >> >> This looks wrong. >> >> ~ Jow > > Specifically? > wouldn't it be DEPENDS:=+kmod-input-core ? ede __

[OpenWrt-Devel] Please ignore: cts 0.2 stable & geomconv 0.3rc2 released

... sorry again ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] cts 0.2 stable & geomconv 0.3rc2 released

continuing my daily release cycle here comes CTS (coordinate transfomation services) Extension, stable until proven otherwise, translated into english, german, spanish, italian Geometry Converter Extension 0.3rc2 fixing a bug where it simply did nothing if an older version of my other extension

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Make package foo conflict with /replace package bar

On 12.06.2011 10:59, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > On 10.06.2011 08:43, harish badrinath wrote: >> Hello, >> If i have a package called foo, How do it specify in its Makefile >> (package/foo/Makefile) that it conflicts with / replaces a package >> called bar. When that happens the compilation is abo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Make package foo conflict with /replace package bar

On 10.06.2011 08:43, harish badrinath wrote: > Hello, > If i have a package called foo, How do it specify in its Makefile > (package/foo/Makefile) that it conflicts with / replaces a package > called bar. When that happens the compilation is aborted until package > bar is deselected. > > try wha

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] initial 2.6.39 support for brcm47xx

works for me on a asus wl-500w. thanks, ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] initial 2.6.39 support for brcm47xx

On 24.05.2011 21:12, Peter Wagner wrote: > i think its more about - he asks me in a polite way not to toppost :) > and if someone asks in a nice way - you can see what you can get ;) he did indeed. probably i just overreact on this. it's like somebody is telling how to talk (in which order)... i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] initial 2.6.39 support for brcm47xx

On 24.05.2011 21:03, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2011/5/24 : >> On 24.05.2011 20:03, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> P.S. >>> Please, don't top post :) >> >> why shouldn't he? it's not like you couldn't understand his message, is it? > > That's posting style that was decided to be used for most open-source >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] initial 2.6.39 support for brcm47xx

On 24.05.2011 20:03, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > P.S. > Please, don't top post :) why shouldn't he? it's not like you couldn't understand his message, is it? ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailm

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

welcome.. you could also manually remove builddir. buildroot is putting files in builddir (.prepared and the like). this is to circumvent to prepare,rebuild,install something again (e.g. when recompile an image with one added pkg added in menuconfig). keep that in mind and you are set for your

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

so where does a (in buildroot root) $> make package//{clean,compile} V=99 leave you?... attach the output or pastebin it .. also check if the new binary is created in builddir ..ede On 12.05.2011 16:08, John Zavgren wrote: > It get's built and staged when I do a "global" make. > > I want

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

isn't it build in the build_dir or just not installed? i see no install definition in your makefile. as jow wrote > f you can you should consider packaging your source as an out-of-tree > module, see for example the KernelPackage / kmod defintions in > package/wprobe/Makefile . ede On 12.05.201

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How does one build just one KLM?

Could you post your makefile here?.. ede On 12.05.2011 02:02, John Zavgren wrote: > Thanks, Christian: > > I read the article on the wiki and then I tried "make > package/vislinkRcv/compile" from the TOPDIR (vislinkRcv is the stuff that I'm > developing) and no KLM was actually built. When I d

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Retaining WAN IP addresses across reboots

On 13.04.2011 19:18, Philip Prindeville wrote: > All of the platforms I have use a CMOS NVRAM with RTC built-in. > > do they have names? ;) ..ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Status of outstanding patches

write to Travis Kemen about the maintainer issue.. in case he didn't read your mail to the end.. regards ede On 25.03.2011 22:46, W. Michael Petullo wrote: > vips-7.24.1.patch, upgrade VIPS to 7.24.1 > > https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/8467 > > I'd be happy to take over the maintena

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] lantiq: various fixes to the extract.sh script

On 28.02.2011 18:26, Luca Olivetti wrote: > [ ! -f ${DIR}decode_ifx_fw -a -f ${DIR}ifxmips_fw_decodev2.tar.bz2 ] These will break if the path contains spaces. Always enclose pathes in double quotes if you can't be sure that they never will include spaces. This is also true for the other places w

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnsmasq leasefile fix

i see to reflect the date change the file is copied to jffs.. makes sense, so the touch alone is more expensive due to the nature of the overlaying fs :) .. thanks ede On 15.02.2011 12:50, Peter Wagner wrote: > no its not about what is more expensive but someone in the development > channel >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] dnsmasq leasefile fix

On 15.02.2011 11:13, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Peter Wagner writes: > >> - [ -n "$leasefile" ] && [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile" >> + [ -n "$leasefile" ] && ( [ -e "$leasefile" ] || touch "$leasefile" ) > > Looks like this is fixed already by commit 15fba44a (but see point 6

[OpenWrt-Devel] build brcm-24 image with trunk

Is there a way to build a kernel 2.4 image for brcm47xx platform with the current buildroot in trunk? The target brcm-2.4 was removed a while ago. How would I do so, except of going back in svn history? thanks ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] base-files/hotplug: refactoring ifup/netstate V2

On 20.01.2011 13:40, John Crispin wrote: >> > without having stomach ache, when base breaks. > i dont get the "when base breaks" bit he means in case the modifications (in the 'alternative' base package) introduce a show stopping bug. ..ede ___ openwrt

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] base-files: refactoring load_modules()

On 20.01.2011 06:50, Scott Nicholas wrote: > I like Bastian's refactorings using only ash builtins. if ever a micro > image is needed, sed/awk can go away. yes? for micro images usually busybox is used and awk/sed are available busybox applets. i really doubt that the size increase is in proport

[OpenWrt-Devel] gawk package

Could you please add http://projects.qi-hardware.com/index.php/p/openwrt-packages/source/tree/release_2010-11-17/gawk/Makefile to the package repository. Thanks ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.or

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] sextante loading mystery solved

I do .. these open* projects all look the same in thunderbirds address suggestions .. I will have to find a solution for that. thanks & sorry, again, ede On 03.11.2010 20:10, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You keep writing to the wrong list ;) -BEGIN

[OpenWrt-Devel] sextante loading mystery solved

phew, that was something. As it turns out. es.unex.sextante.openjump.extensions.SextanteToolboxPlugin detects the path to the extension dir as follows String sPath = System.getProperty("user.dir") + "/lib/ext"; 'user.dir' despite it's name holds the current working dir of the java vm. The old

[OpenWrt-Devel] oj icon on sourceforge

Stefan, could you please upload the attached icon to the sourceforge web? Login there and click on https://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/ on the sf-folder icon left to the title 'The JUMP Pilot Project'. I'd do it. But you know, I can't :). If there is nobody else currently administering

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] font for oj logo needed

sorry wrong list again, please ignore .. ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Package dnsmasq init-file

On 27.10.2010 14:13, Bastian Bittorf wrote: If an already running DHCP-server is found on the configured interface, the init-script refuses to start, but does not give a hint why. It took us some days to track down this behavior in our MANET, where every wifi/adhoc-node runs it own DHCP-server. N

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] openjump.exe with ini

The reasons for a unified java launcher would be - java, which most contributors should understand - one ini file for all architectures - one routine to replace them all ;) (set classpath, build cmd line) sounds worth it to me. ..ede On 01.09.2010 17:34, Larry Becker wrote: It doesn't seem li

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] Trojan in OJ.exe: Positive false message

Wrong list .. sorry, please ignore .. ede ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] Trojan in OJ.exe: Positive false message

I am tired of antivirus detecting viruses in the oj.exe windows starter. We can't send to each and every of them that it is a false positive every time. Solution: We have a working batch file starter. Having a second starter is a) confusing and b) unfortunately unsettling users with virus alerts

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] svn access

ups .. wrong projects mailing list .. sorry, please ignore... ede On 21.07.2010 05:10, Weedy wrote: On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:59 AM, mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de>> wrote: In connection to the work on the gps extension I'd like to request access to the sourceforge svn. I think it'd make sense

[OpenWrt-Devel] svn access

In connection to the work on the gps extension I'd like to request access to the sourceforge svn. I think it'd make sense to store the plugin sources there for others to see and work with. My sourceforge id is e...@users.sourceforge.net . Thanks ede

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dnsmasq bogus nxdomains

sweet, simple and effective. You should put the example configuration on the wiki as well for others suffering the symptoms. thanks ede On 16.07.2010 21:57, mickey wrote: > Hello, > > this patch extends the dnsmasq initscript with an option for bogus-nxdomain. > > From the manpage: > > -B, --b

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openjump-users] Re: VS: Off-list: Mobile GPS solution in OJ

t 10:57 AM, Jukka Rahkonen mailto:jukka.rahko...@latuviitta.fi>> wrote: Edgar Soldin wrote: > On 08.06.2010 16:48, Larry Becker wrote: >> Seems like GPSylon is a large program and you only need the small >> portion ( gpsinput library?) that communi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] failed to install feed oprofile

You need to use kernel 2.6. Enable menuconfig->Global build settings->Compile the kernel with profiling enabled then enable menuconfig->Development->oprofile Don't forget to recompile the kernel. ede On 24.05.2010 11:13, oii...@aol.com wrote: thank you, I couldn't find the oprofile option i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

On 11.05.2010 17:25, Stefan Monnier wrote: but wouldn't the increase in the kernel image actually equal the decrease in the squash image and therefore the size of the rootfs_data stay the same? Both are lzma compressed. I expect that a kernel with some modules built-in will be smaller (both in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

On 10.05.2010 23:47, Bernhard Loos wrote: > 2010/5/10 Bernhard Loos : >> 2010/5/10 Matthias Buecher / Germany : >>> The "linux" partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for >>> flashing. >>> The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of "rootfs") minus >>> 0x0004 (begin of "lin

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

Then it'd make total sense to stuff in whatever fits there .. thanks for the enlightenment, ede On 10.05.2010 23:38, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > The "linux" partition spans over the kernel and the complete rootfs for > flashing. > The maximum kernel size is 0x000bc000 (begin of "rootfs") m

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

are these sizes fixed or calculated according the space requirement? Looks like the linux size is fixed, what is the maximum size for a kernel on wrt54g? .. ede On 10.05.2010 23:28, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > Kernel and rootfs are in two different mtd partitions on the WRT54G: > > # dme

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

but wouldn't the increase in the kernel image actually equal the decrease in the squash image and therefore the size of the rootfs_data stay the same? Both are lzma compressed. ..ede On 10.05.2010 19:16, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > It may not downsize the packages themselves, but moving

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

there is partly in https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/include/kernel-defaults.mk line 101 you can actually add CONFIG_KERNEL_* entries to your .config and they are copied over as CONFIG_* to the kernel config. All that's missing is a menuconfig interface for that. But at least for routers u

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

true, my bad, actually one can see it in the end of a make run, how the packages (incl. kmods) are installed to the image filesystem. thanks ede On 09.05.2010 18:19, Bernhard Loos wrote: > Actually, Y in menuconfig doesn't add the modules into the kernel, > they will still be kernel modules. It o

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire] WRT54G flash space problem

That's how it works. Y adds kernel modules to the kernel, and programs to the image. ..ede On 09.05.2010 18:10, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > In 'make menuconfig' I included them with 'Y' instead of 'M'. > According to my (newbie) knowledge that adds them to the kernel image. > Can somebody

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Stopping watchdog

On 03.05.2010 15:59, Yury Polyanskiy wrote: On Mon, 3 May 2010 09:35:59 + Vasilis Tsiligiannis wrote: + [ -c /dev/watchdog ]&& echo "V"> /dev/watchdog Why is this needed? busybox watchdog applet writes the magic on shutdown. What is magic? In this context .. thanks ede __

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire][bug] setting LAN mac address, makes router inaccessible from LAN

On 29.04.2010 20:38, Matthias Buecher / Germany wrote: > > On 29.04.2010 10:34, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: >> >>> So for others without serial access or JTAG, this issue is like a >>> bricked router. >>> This issue should definitely be on the known problems page [1] and >>> verified on other devic

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [backfire][bug] setting LAN mac address, makes router inaccessible from LAN

So for others without serial access or JTAG, this issue is like a bricked router. This issue should definitely be on the known problems page [1] and verified on other devices. Wouldn't it still be possible to tftp flash the router? Looks like it .. ede __

  1   2   >