[OpenWrt-Devel] looking for at91 test hardware

2015-02-15 Thread John Crispin
Hi, does anyone have one of these -> http://www.atmel.com/tools/ATSAMA5D3-XPLD.aspx that he wants to donate so that i have something to test at91 images on John ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx update to v3.18

2015-02-15 Thread John Crispin
On 16/02/2015 00:15, Paul Blazejowski wrote: > 00 KHz AUTO), (N/A, 2000 mBm), (0 s) > [ 21.73] cfg80211: (549 KHz - 573 KHz @ 16 KHz), > (N/A, 2000 mBm), (0 s) > [ 21.74] cfg80211: (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 8 KHz), > (N/A, 2000 mBm), (N/A) > [ 21.75] cfg80

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] oxnas: fix itb generation

2015-02-15 Thread Dirk Neukirchen
- according to imx6 Makefile and u-Boot documentation is itb and probably should not be changed - this fixes build error if CONFIG_TARGET_ROOTFS_INCLUDE_FIT is set (missing .itb file) - use DTS_DIR (like in imx6 Makefile) only compile tested Signed-off-by: Dirk Neukirchen --- target/linux/

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx update to v3.18

2015-02-15 Thread Michaël Zweers
It builds oke now, but its doesn't boot on my device. i don't get to see any (informative) boot error's (see log). John Crispin schreef op 15-2-2015 om 22:16: > > > On 15/02/2015 21:44, Michaël Zweers wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I got a error message (kernel compile log included) when building

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx update to v3.18

2015-02-15 Thread Daniel Golle
Hi John, 3.18 works nicely on the TL-WR1043ND from what I can tell for now. I had to fix usb-net support (see patch) and for a moment I thought that was the only obstacle. However, OpenVPN is segfaulting once a connection got established. The same version of OpenVPN (built against PolarSSL) worke

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] linux/modules: select CONFIG_USB_NET_DRIVERS for kmod-usb-net

2015-02-15 Thread Daniel Golle
USB network drivers gained their own sub-menu. Thus they are only visible and built if CONFIG_USB_NET_DRIVERS=y on recent kernels. Set that symbol when building kmod-usb-net. Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle --- package/kernel/linux/modules/usb.mk | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx update to v3.18

2015-02-15 Thread Paul Blazejowski
On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 20:49 +0100, John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > i just pushed the v3.18 support for ar71xx. i have tested this on > carambola2, unifi and wndr4300. the default is still at 3.14. please > start testing on more hardware. > > to do so you need to set the kernel to 3.18 in > target/l

[OpenWrt-Devel] Google Summer of Code 2015

2015-02-15 Thread Nemesis
Hi guys, Freifunk and Ninux are applying for the GSoC 2015. You might want to propose projects ideas if you feel like it. Freifunk ideas page: http://wiki.freifunk.net/Ideas Ninux ideas page: http://wiki.ninux.org/GSoCIdeas2015 Federico ___ openwrt-d

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx update to v3.18

2015-02-15 Thread Hannu Nyman
I compiled r44459 for wndr3700 & wndr3800 with 3.18. So far no problems: my wndr3800 booted ok with 3.18 and has survived the first stress tests ;-) ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailma

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx update to v3.18

2015-02-15 Thread John Crispin
On 15/02/2015 21:44, Michaël Zweers wrote: > > Hello, > > I got a error message (kernel compile log included) when building v3.18 > for wr703n. > > If you need additional info let me know. > > please retry, i just pushed a fix ___ openwrt-devel ma

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx update to v3.18

2015-02-15 Thread Michaël Zweers
Hello, I got a error message (kernel compile log included) when building v3.18 for wr703n. If you need additional info let me know. John Crispin schreef op 15-2-2015 om 20:49: > Hi, > > i just pushed the v3.18 support for ar71xx. i have tested this on > carambola2, unifi and wndr4300. the def

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx update to v3.18

2015-02-15 Thread John Crispin
Hi, On 15/02/2015 20:56, Daniel Petre wrote: > are there any extra big advantages for OpenWrt since 3.14 ? eBPF is my personal favorite. John ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailm

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx update to v3.18

2015-02-15 Thread Daniel Petre
On 15/02/15 21:49, John Crispin wrote: Hi, i just pushed the v3.18 support for ar71xx. i have tested this on carambola2, unifi and wndr4300. the default is still at 3.14. please start testing on more hardware. to do so you need to set the kernel to 3.18 in target/linux/ar71xx/Makefile as the de

[OpenWrt-Devel] ar71xx update to v3.18

2015-02-15 Thread John Crispin
Hi, i just pushed the v3.18 support for ar71xx. i have tested this on carambola2, unifi and wndr4300. the default is still at 3.14. please start testing on more hardware. to do so you need to set the kernel to 3.18 in target/linux/ar71xx/Makefile as the default is still at 3.14. 902-unaligned_ac

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] iproute2: bump version from v3.18.0 to v3.19.0

2015-02-15 Thread Russell Senior
with refreshed patches Signed-off-by: Russell Senior --- package/network/utils/iproute2/Makefile | 4 ++-- .../network/utils/iproute2/patches/006-no_sctp.patch| 4 ++-- .../utils/iproute2/patches/120-libnetlink-pic.patch | 7 --- .../utils/iproute2/patches/200-add

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

2015-02-15 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Sebastian Moeller writes: > Not that I have shown great taste in the past, but I think it > would be somewhat cleaner to put the logic into the hot plug script > and keep run.sh “simple” (in the past I had introduced a large number > of leakage, especially of IFBs by not properly removing/s

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

2015-02-15 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Alan, On Feb 15, 2015, at 15:39 , Alan Jenkins wrote: > Hi Toke > > I tried installing sqm-scripts from trunk, on Barrier Breaker on my wndr3800. > > It's very effective, but I notice SQM isn't applied at boot time. The system > log complains about pppoe-wan interface not existing, when t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

2015-02-15 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Toke, On Feb 15, 2015, at 16:56 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Sebastian Moeller writes: > >> I am not sure that this works as intended. The first thing >> run.sh does is take down all running SQM instances: > > Ah yes, seems I was a bit too trigger-happy there ;) > > Here's

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

2015-02-15 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Sebastian Moeller writes: > I am not sure that this works as intended. The first thing > run.sh does is take down all running SQM instances: Ah yes, seems I was a bit too trigger-happy there ;) Here's a version of run.sh that should also short-circuit the 'down' part if called from

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Cerowrt-devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

2015-02-15 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Toke, On Feb 15, 2015, at 16:00 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Alan Jenkins writes: > >> It's very effective, but I notice SQM isn't applied at boot time. The >> system log complains about pppoe-wan interface not existing, when the >> sqm init script is started. > > Ah, that makes sens

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] enabling seccomp by default in kernel

2015-02-15 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 15:31 -0800, David Lang wrote: > > I've also enabled the ocserv package to use seccomp if configured to, > > but in order for that protection to become meaningful for other > > programs to use as well, it would also need the default kernel option to > > enable seccomp filter.

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86:switch kernel to 3.18

2015-02-15 Thread Hans Ulli Kroll
Signed-off-by: Hans Ulli Kroll --- target/linux/x86/Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/target/linux/x86/Makefile b/target/linux/x86/Makefile index 52d9885..396d483 100644 --- a/target/linux/x86/Makefile +++ b/target/linux/x86/Makefile @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ FE

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86:add kenrel config for 3.18

2015-02-15 Thread Hans Ulli Kroll
Signed-off-by: Hans Ulli Kroll --- target/linux/x86/config-3.18 | 437 +++ 1 file changed, 437 insertions(+) create mode 100644 target/linux/x86/config-3.18 diff --git a/target/linux/x86/config-3.18 b/target/linux/x86/config-3.18 new file mode 100644 inde

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86:refresh patches for 3.18

2015-02-15 Thread Hans Ulli Kroll
Signed-off-by: Hans Ulli Kroll --- .../linux/x86/patches-3.18/006-yenta_mistery.patch | 20 + .../patches-3.18/009-rdc321x_select_embedded.patch | 11 + .../linux/x86/patches-3.18/010-rdc_cpu_ident.patch | 176 + .../x86/patches-3.18/011-tune_lzma_options.patch | 22 + .../x86/patches-3.

[OpenWrt-Devel] x86: kernel update for 3.18

2015-02-15 Thread Hans Ulli Kroll
Hello, I've done a kernel update for the x86 target. These are tested on my PC Engines ALIX6F2 Signed-off-by: Hans Ulli Kroll ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-deve

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [sqm-scripts] not started at boot?

2015-02-15 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Alan Jenkins writes: > It's very effective, but I notice SQM isn't applied at boot time. The > system log complains about pppoe-wan interface not existing, when the > sqm init script is started. Ah, that makes sense I suppose: PPPOE is probably brought up too late for the SQM init script to pick

[OpenWrt-Devel] act_connmark in kernel 3.10

2015-02-15 Thread Edison Figueira Junior
Hello Mr. Felix, I would use the act_connmark on CentOS 7 with the original kernel 3.10.xx, you have patch for use with this version of the kernel? I applied the patch in version 3.19 and it works perfectly, but at 3:10 the same kernel downloaded from kernel.org and that have the senguinte error

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Hyper-V Support for X86 or X86_64

2015-02-15 Thread Dirk Neukirchen
On 21.01.2015 20:04, Ning Ye wrote: > This is the latest Hyper-V patch to support Linux 3.14. > > > Signed-off-by: Ning Ye > > +$(eval $(call KernelPackage,hyperv-util)) > + > +# > +# Hyper-V Storage Drive needs to be in kernel rather tha