[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][packages][v2] asterisk-11.x : update to 11.3.0

2013-03-28 Thread Jiri Slachta
The changelog for the latest version of asterisk mostly brings bugfixes for ConfBridge, resolves deadlocks between pending CDR and batch CDR locks, prevents DoS in HTTP server and prevents buffer overflow through H.264 negotiation. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slachta Index: net/asterisk-11.x/patches/0

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] E4200 and broadcom 47xx soc

2013-03-28 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 03/29/2013 01:47 AM, Chirag Chhatriwala wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Hauke Mehrtens > wrote: > > > You need the bgmac Ethernet driver and wifi should be supported by b43, > brcmsmac or wl. The 5GHz wifi will not work in 5GHz mode and it c

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] E4200 and broadcom 47xx soc

2013-03-28 Thread Chirag Chhatriwala
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > You need the bgmac Ethernet driver and wifi should be supported by b43, > brcmsmac or wl. The 5GHz wifi will not work in 5GHz mode and it could > work in 2.4 GHZ mode with b43. > > Select a profile with "all Ethernet" or "bgmac Ethernet".

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] E4200 and broadcom 47xx soc

2013-03-28 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 03/29/2013 12:08 AM, Chirag Chhatriwala wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm just about ready to solder on some header pins and connect my E4200 > via the serial/uart console. > In the meantime, what is the correct Target profile to make sure my > router's ethernet and wifi work without any issues (on my o

[OpenWrt-Devel] E4200 and broadcom 47xx soc

2013-03-28 Thread Chirag Chhatriwala
Hi All, I'm just about ready to solder on some header pins and connect my E4200 via the serial/uart console. In the meantime, what is the correct Target profile to make sure my router's ethernet and wifi work without any issues (on my own build of openwrt trunk). Broadcom SoC, all Ethernet, BCM43

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][packages] asterisk-11.x : update to 11.3.0

2013-03-28 Thread Luka Perkov
Hi Jiri, On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:04:08PM +0100, Jiri Slachta wrote: > Index: net/asterisk-11.x/patches/010-asterisk-configure-undef-res-ninit.patch > === > --- net/asterisk-11.x/patches/010-asterisk-configure-undef-res-ninit.patch

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] how to enable openssl hardware encryption engine ?

2013-03-28 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
You are awesome! I'll test is tomorrow. On 27 Mar 2013 01:58, "Jiri Slachta" wrote: > Hello Valent, > > those engine libraries are not installed because of /install macro of > openssl package. I've prepared a small unofficial patch for you, it's a > package libopenssl-engines. If it should be off

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][packages] asterisk-11.x : update to 11.3.0

2013-03-28 Thread Jiri Slachta
Within last two days there were two versions of asterisk-11.x released. The changelog of the latest version mostly brings bugfixes for ConfBridge, resolves deadlocks between pending CDR and batch CDR locks, prevents DoS in HTTP server and prevents buffer overflow through H.264 negotiation. Sign

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][packages] asterisk-11.x : update to 11.2.2

2013-03-28 Thread Jiri Slachta
Hello, at the moment when I was preparing a patch for asterisk there was 11.2.2 version available. After few hours the version 11.3.0 became available. I am currently building and testing the latest 11.3.0 version to verify its functionality. Within a sec I will prepare a new patchset. Jiri

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][packages] asterisk-11.x : update to 11.2.2

2013-03-28 Thread Chirag Chhatriwala
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jiri Slachta wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slachta > Index: feeds/packages/net/asterisk-11.x/Makefile > === > --- net/asterisk-11.x/Makefile (revision 36134) > +++ net/asterisk-11.x/Makefile (wor

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][packages] asterisk-11.x : update to 11.2.2

2013-03-28 Thread Jiri Slachta
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slachta Index: feeds/packages/net/asterisk-11.x/Makefile === --- net/asterisk-11.x/Makefile (revision 36134) +++ net/asterisk-11.x/Makefile (working copy) @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk PKG_NAM

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] will AA ever get out of RC status?

2013-03-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-03-28 09:15 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Does it still have the horribly broken OpenSSL 1.0.1d release? That was > *very* quickly superseded by 1.0.1e, and then some fixes on top of that. > It would be a shame to ship 1.0.1d; better to have stuck with 1.0.1c > than that! The very last com

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] will AA ever get out of RC status?

2013-03-28 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 14:22 +0100, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hello, > > Le 03/28/13 14:15, David Woodhouse a écrit : > > On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 14:12 +0100, Manuel Munz wrote: > >> > >> The fact that the AA branch is frozen since 9 days or so makes me a bit > >> optimistic that there might be a rel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] will AA ever get out of RC status?

2013-03-28 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hello, Le 03/28/13 14:15, David Woodhouse a écrit : On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 14:12 +0100, Manuel Munz wrote: The fact that the AA branch is frozen since 9 days or so makes me a bit optimistic that there might be a release coming. Not too much optimism, but it could be that it finally comes out ;)

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] will AA ever get out of RC status?

2013-03-28 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 14:12 +0100, Manuel Munz wrote: > > The fact that the AA branch is frozen since 9 days or so makes me a bit > optimistic that there might be a release coming. Not too much optimism, > but it could be that it finally comes out ;) Does it still have the horribly broken OpenSSL

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] will AA ever get out of RC status?

2013-03-28 Thread Manuel Munz
On 28.03.2013 12:30, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > I thought I read a message either here or on the user list many weeks > ago that the build farm was being spun up to do a final AA release. But > still there is no release. No new RC. > > According to http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [toolchain] Stop generating a broken symlink in TOOLCHAIN_DIR/lib

2013-03-28 Thread Luka Perkov
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 06:27:50AM -0400, John Szakmeister wrote: > It turns out that the symlink may exists already by the time the > toolchain Makefile gets an opportunity to run. While we asked to > replace the target, ln doesn't do so until after dereferencing the > existing symlink. This res

[OpenWrt-Devel] will AA ever get out of RC status?

2013-03-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I thought I read a message either here or on the user list many weeks ago that the build farm was being spun up to do a final AA release. But still there is no release. No new RC. According to http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment/ AA has been in a single release candidate stage for 4

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] kernel: Allow talitos crypto hw module selection

2013-03-28 Thread Helmut Schaa
Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa --- package/kernel/modules/crypto.mk | 14 ++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/package/kernel/modules/crypto.mk b/package/kernel/modules/crypto.mk index 6a3b5a6..be76f53 100644 --- a/package/kernel/modules/crypto.mk +++ b/package/kernel/mod