Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] lantiq and Netgear fixes/enhancements

2012-11-27 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 07:53 +0100, John Crispin wrote: > On 28/11/12 02:47, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: > > This corrects a few oversights in mach-netgear.c, adds a diag.sh with > > per-board conditionals, in line with the uci-defaults "leds" file, fixes > > the Netgear eth0 MAC address detection, a

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] lantiq and Netgear fixes/enhancements

2012-11-27 Thread John Crispin
On 28/11/12 02:47, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: This corrects a few oversights in mach-netgear.c, adds a diag.sh with per-board conditionals, in line with the uci-defaults "leds" file, fixes the Netgear eth0 MAC address detection, and provides a mechanism for the DSL driver to have a preset MAC addr

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] lantiq and Netgear fixes/enhancements

2012-11-27 Thread Daniel Gimpelevich
This corrects a few oversights in mach-netgear.c, adds a diag.sh with per-board conditionals, in line with the uci-defaults "leds" file, fixes the Netgear eth0 MAC address detection, and provides a mechanism for the DSL driver to have a preset MAC address. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gimpelevich Index

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] atheros: Revert "Add leds back after migration to sysfs"

2012-11-27 Thread Jonathan Bither
@Karl, Thank you, I will try to get ahold of one of those boards. @Hanno, This was intended to only fix the booting. I'll repost and include the gpio changes as well. I cloned the OpenWRT git onto github where I was going to start work on the updates for the atheros targets. Once

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] image.mk: don't squash file permissions in JFFS2 images

2012-11-27 Thread Florian Fainelli
Le vendredi 23 novembre 2012 19:10:01, Jonh Wendell a écrit : > Currently we call mkfs.jffs2 --squash, which will change > both file permissions and owners. > > If we have some file with suid bits, it will clear these bits. > > Thus it's enough to just squash file owners, by replacing that > argu

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [ar7] add AudioCodes AC495 SoC

2012-11-27 Thread Florian Fainelli
Le mardi 27 novembre 2012 05:41:18, Daniel Golle a écrit : > Found in the AudioCodes Tulip AC494 ATA. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle Applied in r34395, thanks Daniel! -- Florian ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://l

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3][BCM63XX] Fix typo in 96338GW power LED.

2012-11-27 Thread Florian Fainelli
Le dimanche 25 novembre 2012 17:57:53, Álvaro Fernández Rojas a écrit : > Fix typo in 96338GW power LED. > > Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas > --- Applied in r34396, thanks! -- Florian ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.or

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] glib2: bump version to 2.34.3

2012-11-27 Thread Jonh Wendell
dropped all patches, they are no longer necessary. Signed-off-by: Jonh Wendell --- libs/glib2/Makefile| 17 ++-- libs/glib2/patches/001-automake-compat.patch | 12 --- .../patches/002-missing-gthread-include.patch | 10 --- libs/glib2/patches/010-

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] libffi: enable the host build, needed for newer glib

2012-11-27 Thread Jonh Wendell
Signed-off-by: Jonh Wendell --- libs/libffi/Makefile |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/libs/libffi/Makefile b/libs/libffi/Makefile index 90c29ce..e3b2839 100644 --- a/libs/libffi/Makefile +++ b/libs/libffi/Makefile @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ PKG_FIXUP:=autoreconf PKG_INSTALL:=1 i

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] libffi: bump version to 3.0.11

2012-11-27 Thread Jonh Wendell
Signed-off-by: Jonh Wendell --- libs/libffi/Makefile |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/libffi/Makefile b/libs/libffi/Makefile index 67af8f7..90c29ce 100644 --- a/libs/libffi/Makefile +++ b/libs/libffi/Makefile @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ include $(TOPDIR)/rule

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dsl support for the luci webinterface

2012-11-27 Thread Frank Meerkötter
Hi, this patch is the work of* *Lee Essen which he posted here in January. https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2012-January/013602.html Unfortunately not everything was merged back then. The integration into the web-ui was lost. I have rebased the patch against the current trunk an

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] build-system: allow to re-make a package without doing full clean

2012-11-27 Thread Roman Yeryomin
This will allow to call `make package//make' to rerun package Build/Compile thus recompiling changed files. Package should be previously compiled. This is very handful especially when using package-version-override.mk or simply using local files manually with bigger packages. Signed-off-by: Roman

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] milliseconds time measurements

2012-11-27 Thread Gabriel
John, I’ll try with that! Etienne, i use to compile openwrt, in the next compilation I'll try that nanoseconds support. Thanks both for your answers. Best regards Gabriel El 26/11/12 18:03, Etienne Champetier escribió: Hi if you know how to compile openwrt yourself, you can activate nano

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCHv2] build-system: allow to call clean target from source makefile

2012-11-27 Thread Roman Yeryomin
On 20 November 2012 21:45, Roman Yeryomin wrote: > When developing/debugging a package I would like to make > change/compile/try cycle to be shorter. > Of cause you can do something like: > - edit/save the code > - cd build_dir/target_something/package > - make clean > - rm -f .built* > - cd - >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] DSL support and luci integration

2012-11-27 Thread Frank Meerkötter
On 27/11/12 12:32, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Why is there even a need for dedicated DSL control in the gui? > Shouldn't the normal per-interface ifup/ifdown be enough? The patch to the web-ui isn't about control, but about DSL status information.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] DSL support and luci integration

2012-11-27 Thread Frank Meerkötter
On 27/11/12 12:28, John Crispin wrote: > On 27/11/12 12:23, Frank Meerkötter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> back in January there was a discussion on how to integrate DSL >> into Luci. >> >> https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2012-January/013587.html >> >> A patch was presented which only got p

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] DSL support and luci integration

2012-11-27 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Why is there even a need for dedicated DSL control in the gui? Shouldn't the normal per-interface ifup/ifdown be enough? ~ Jow -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.n

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] DSL support and luci integration

2012-11-27 Thread John Crispin
On 27/11/12 12:23, Frank Meerkötter wrote: Hi, back in January there was a discussion on how to integrate DSL into Luci. https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2012-January/013587.html A patch was presented which only got partially merged. The dsl_control.sh is there, the integratio

[OpenWrt-Devel] DSL support and luci integration

2012-11-27 Thread Frank Meerkötter
Hi, back in January there was a discussion on how to integrate DSL into Luci. https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2012-January/013587.html A patch was presented which only got partially merged. The dsl_control.sh is there, the integration into the web-ui seems to be missing (AA & t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Linux kernel module hacking

2012-11-27 Thread Petr Štetiar
Thomas Taranowski [2012-11-26 20:39:18]: > I'm working on making some prototype mods to the ath9k driver, and am > trying to figure out how to get the affected kernel ath9k module to > rebuild, and subsequently have the appropriate image rebuilt. I've tried a > number of paths, but without much

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Linux kernel module hacking

2012-11-27 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OpenWrt does not use the in-kernel ath9k driver. The correct make targets would be make package/mac80211/clean and make package/mac80211/compile . ~ Jow -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ramips: enable DSP extensions on supported platforms

2012-11-27 Thread Florian Fainelli
On Monday 12 November 2012 20:50:27 Daniel Golle wrote: > I don't think its actually used anywhere, but GCC supports generating code for > it, both explicitely and also by using the generic vector extension. > I carried this around in my tree for a while and it at least didn't cause any > trouble s