On 01.03.2010 22:59, David Sommerseth wrote:
Could you please have a look at git://git.birkenwald.de/openvpn.git
test-rebase branch? The history of gert-ipv6 was starting to look a bit
weird (duplicate commits with the same content), to I rebased it on your
bugfix2.1 branch (and dropped the dupl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/10 22:41, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>>> It doesn't make a difference at the moment (since the patch came from
>>> feat_ipv6_payload in the first place), but what's the general wish for
>>> the future? What to rebase on?
>>
>> To b
Hi David,
It doesn't make a difference at the moment (since the patch came from
feat_ipv6_payload in the first place), but what's the general wish for
the future? What to rebase on?
To be very honest, I'm very uncertain about what's best. Because it
will a lot of changes in multiple branches.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/10 22:09, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> David Sommerseth wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
>>> David, could you please pull my branch from Berni, and move that patch
>>> to wherever bugfixes/code cleanups go? It should merge easily into
>>> all branches
David Sommerseth wrote:
Hi David,
>> David, could you please pull my branch from Berni, and move that patch
>> to wherever bugfixes/code cleanups go? It should merge easily into
>> all branches.
>
> Pushed and pulled. I've only put your extra commit into the bugfix2.1
> branch (as a cherry-pi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/02/10 23:14, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 04:37:45PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> On 28/02/10 16:10, Eric F Crist wrote:
>>> ACK,
>>>
>>> It's not you, that's duplicate code.
>>
>> ACK. I this is indeed duplicated.
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 04:37:45PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 28/02/10 16:10, Eric F Crist wrote:
> > ACK,
> >
> > It's not you, that's duplicate code.
>
> ACK. I this is indeed duplicated.
Thanks. I have committed this to my branch (because I'm too tired right
now to get branch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/02/10 16:10, Eric F Crist wrote:
> ACK,
>
> It's not you, that's duplicate code.
>
ACK. I this is indeed duplicated.
David S.
> On Feb 28, 2010, at 09:05:46, Gert Doering wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> tun.c contains this code, in the
>>
>> #elif
ACK,
It's not you, that's duplicate code.
Eric
On Feb 28, 2010, at 09:05:46, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tun.c contains this code, in the
>
> #elif defined(TARGET_FREEBSD)||defined(TARGET_DRAGONFLY)
>
> part of do_ifconfig() (about line 983 in the IPv6 payload branch):
>
> -
Hi,
tun.c contains this code, in the
#elif defined(TARGET_FREEBSD)||defined(TARGET_DRAGONFLY)
part of do_ifconfig() (about line 983 in the IPv6 payload branch):
- snip
else {
if (tt->topology == TOP_SUBNET)
argv_printf (&argv,
10 matches
Mail list logo
