-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/03/10 22:41, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
>>> It doesn't make a difference at the moment (since the patch came from
>>> feat_ipv6_payload in the first place), but what's the general wish for
>>> the future? What to rebase on?
>>
>> To be very honest, I'm very uncertain about what's best.  Because it
>> will a lot of changes in multiple branches.  But as I'm able now to keep
>> the bugfix2.1 branch pretty clean with only bugfixes, I begin to lean
>> towards that you should consider to rebase on that branch.
> 
> Could you please have a look at git://git.birkenwald.de/openvpn.git
> test-rebase branch? The history of gert-ipv6 was starting to look a bit
> weird (duplicate commits with the same content), to I rebased it on your
> bugfix2.1 branch (and dropped the duplicate commits in the process). No
> difference in the content whatsoever and the history looks much better,
> but I'm not exactly sure whether this is the right thing to do.
> 

I tried to both merge and rebase both your gert-ipv6 branch and the
test-rebase branch from the allmerged branch.  That was quite an
interesting experience.

The test-rebase branch gave most problems.  Both rebase and merge got
painful.  While with the gert-ipv6 gave only (expected, though) issues
with rebase.  Merging in gert-ipv6 was more or less painless.

The only conflict was the title string in options.c, which will always
be a conflict area when merging in multiple feature branches.  But this
conflict is really trivial, and I'm not worried about that one.

I will try to ask some kernel guys about such situation what they would
recommend.

Regarding to the "duplicated commits", I believe that's what's happens
especially when cherry-picks are involved.  Not sure how bad Gerts
history was though.  But you might get an idea when using git log
- --graph ... then you see better which branch each commits belongs to.


kind regards,

David Sommerseth
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkuMOK0ACgkQDC186MBRfrqiXACfVUnAITzSpEJCM74dgrVfCQPY
PJ8An0NbhiMdxIUkZCrmRr7+SlLlN3Rs
=d7ys
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to