Mike, pls share the solution, some are interested even if is a hack as long
as it gets the job done.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Jacob Godin wrote:
> Hey Mike,
>
> Would you send along your solution off-list? I'm curious, and I won't
> judge :)
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Mike S
Hello again, folks!
I went over all the schedules at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings
And for the Even months (Feb, April, June, etc). #openstack-meeting was open
at 16:00 UTC. So, I've updated the above to include our meeting and added:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/LDT
Hey Mike,
Would you send along your solution off-list? I'm curious, and I won't judge
:)
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> Jacob Godin wrote on 04/14/2015 05:12:48 PM:
>
> > Absolutely. We're trying to reduce our public IPv4 usage, so having
> > one per tenant network (n
Jacob Godin wrote on 04/14/2015 05:12:48 PM:
> Absolutely. We're trying to reduce our public IPv4 usage, so having
> one per tenant network (not even including floating IPs) is a drain.
I am having exactly the same issue. I am currently solving it with a
different hack that nobody likes, I wi
Absolutely. We're trying to reduce our public IPv4 usage, so having one per
tenant network (not even including floating IPs) is a drain.
Instead of having: instance -> (gateway IP) virtual router NAT (public IP)
-> (public gateway) router
We want to have: instance -> (gateway IP) virtual router NA
Thanks Kevin. That might work in some instances, however our tenants have
the ability to create their own routers and allocate their gateway. I
suppose we could hack some code in to restrict what networks are usable for
routers vs floating IPs.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
Probably not in the way you want.
You can have two subnets on the external network. Then you would set the
allocation pool to be nothing for the subnet that you want the router
interfaces to be attached to to make sure floating IPs aren't allocated
from it. Then whenever you attach a router interf
- Original Message -
> Hi folks,
>
> Looking for a bit of advice on how to accomplish something with Neutron. Our
> setup uses OVS+GRE with isolated tenant networks. Currently, we have one
> large network servicing our Floating IPs as well as our external router
> interfaces.
>
> What we'
Operators,
Your feedback is one of the reasons why our Puppet modules are very
popular; we would like to continue to organize a Puppet session during
the next OPS meeting in Vancouver summit.
To track all what we need to cover, I created a new etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-su
Hi folks,
Looking for a bit of advice on how to accomplish something with Neutron.
Our setup uses OVS+GRE with isolated tenant networks. Currently, we have
one large network servicing our Floating IPs as well as our external router
interfaces.
What we're looking to do is actually have two distinc
Hi,
Does anyone use any version of ZeroMQ driver in production deployment?
If you do, please leave your comments in [1], or reply to this letter.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/171131/
Thanks,
Oleksii Zamiatin
___
OpenStack-operators mailing li
Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
the flood gates for even more python3 problems to be found and fixed.
Recently a proposal was made to make oslo.messaging start to run python3
tests[2], and
Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
the flood gates for even more python3 problems to be found and fixed.
Recently a proposal was made to make oslo.messaging start to run python3
tests[2], and
13 matches
Mail list logo
