Hey Mike, Would you send along your solution off-list? I'm curious, and I won't judge :)
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Mike Spreitzer <[email protected]> wrote: > Jacob Godin <[email protected]> wrote on 04/14/2015 05:12:48 PM: > > > Absolutely. We're trying to reduce our public IPv4 usage, so having > > one per tenant network (not even including floating IPs) is a drain. > > I am having exactly the same issue. I am currently solving it with a > different hack that nobody likes, I will not even describe it here. But > total agreement that the problem is important. > > IPv6 is the ultimate answer, provided there is a reasonably smooth > transition. I think we will need to support a tenant that is using both v4 > and v6 during his transition. This will require NAT between a tenant's v4 > and v6. > > Regards, > Mike
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
