Jacob Godin <jacobgo...@gmail.com> wrote on 04/14/2015 05:12:48 PM:
> Absolutely. We're trying to reduce our public IPv4 usage, so having
> one per tenant network (not even including floating IPs) is a drain.
I am having exactly the same issue. I am currently solving it with a
different hack that nobody likes, I will not even describe it here. But
total agreement that the problem is important.
IPv6 is the ultimate answer, provided there is a reasonably smooth
transition. I think we will need to support a tenant that is using both
v4 and v6 during his transition. This will require NAT between a tenant's
v4 and v6.
Regards,
Mike
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
