Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Asia friendly IRC meeting time

+1 on alternative meeting times. Maybe we can come up with some candidates and put for vote on doodle? cf. Oslo meeting time vote page: http://doodle.com/zv8izg7ymxcank34 -zhongyue On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Zhidong Yu wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to propose a time change to the weekly

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] removing XML testing completely from Tempest

On 24/11/14 08:56 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: Having XML payloads was never a universal part of OpenStack services. During the Icehouse release the TC declared that being an OpenStack service requires having a JSON REST API. Projects could do what they wanted beyond that. Lots of them deprecated and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2 Agent][Debt] Bootstrapping an L2 agent debt repayment task force

Hi Armando, Indeed agent-less solution like external controller is very interesting, and in some certain cases it has advantage over agent solution, e.g. software installation is prohibited on Compute Node. However, Neutron Agent has its irreplaceable benefits: multiple backends support like SRIO

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev]Can we support more than one external networks

Hello stackers, We faced with a problem. We have more than one external networks, and we want openstack to support these external networks. Our solution is to set the neutron L3-agent parameter external_network_bridge and gateway_external_network_id to empty, while interface qg is on t

[openstack-dev] [Telco] [NFV] [Heat] Telco Orchestration

Hi all, as discussed during our summit sessions we would like to expand the scope of the Telco WG (aka OpenStack NFV group) and start working on the orchestration topic (ETSI MANO). Therefore we started with an etherpad [1] to collect ideas, use-cases and requirements. Goal is to discuss this d

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Fuel Plugins, First look; Whats Next?

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Andrew Woodward wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Evgeniy L wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Comments inline. > > Also could you please provide a link on OpenStack upgrade feature? > > It's not clear why do you need it as a plugin and how you are going > >

[openstack-dev] unsubscribe

Estevão Vargas | Unisys Enterprise Services | Application Services Unisys | Avenida Oscar Niemeyer, 119, - 1o andar | Nova Lima-MG Brazil | 692 2725 | +55 31 3323-2795 | +55 31 8401-7174 [cid:[email protected]] [cid:image002.gi

[openstack-dev] [nova][glance] why do image properties control per-instance settings?

Hi all, I've just been doing some user consultation and pondering a case for use of the Qemu Guest Agent in order to get quiesced backups. In doing so I found myself wondering why on earth I need to set an image property in Glance (hw_qemu_guest_agent) to toggle such a thing for any particular in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo][Neutron] Fork() safety and oslo.messaging

Hi, I think the main issue is the behavior of the API of oslo-incubator/openstack/common/service.py, specially: * ProcessLauncher.launch_service(MyService()) And then the MyService have this behavior: class MyService: def __init__(self): # CODE DONE BEFORE os.fork() def start(se

Re: [openstack-dev] [Telco] [NFV] [Heat] Telco Orchestration

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Marc Koderer wrote: > Hi all, > > as discussed during our summit sessions we would like to expand the scope > of the Telco WG (aka OpenStack NFV group) and start working > on the orchestration topic (ETSI MANO). > > Therefore we started with an etherpad [1] to col

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] external plugin support for Devstack

On 11/24/2014 10:31 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/24/2014 10:17 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Sean Dague > > wrote: >> >> We should also make this something which is gate friendly. I think the >> idea had been that if projects incl

[openstack-dev] Issues regarding Jenkins

Hi All, I am facing some issues regarding Jenkins. Actually Jenkins is failing and it is giving "NOT_REGISTERED" in some tests. So, kindly let me know what does "NOT_REGISTERED" mean here. Build failed (check pipeline). For information on how to proceed, see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon]

On 25/11/14 00:09, David Lyle wrote: > I am pleased to nominate Thai Tran and Cindy Lu to horizon-core. [...] Thai Tran +1 Cindy Lu +1 -- Radomir Dopieralski ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] ODL Policy Driver Specs

Hey All, I need to understand the interaction between the Openstack GBP and the Opendaylight GBP project which will be done by ODL Policy driver. Can someone provide me with specs of ODL Policy driver for making my understanding on call flow. Thanks & Regards Sachi Gupta =-=-=

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] Splitting up the assignment component

Hi As most of you know, we have approved a spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129397/) to split the assignments component up into two pieces, and the code (divided up into a series of patches) is currently in review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130954/). While most aspects of the spli

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues regarding Jenkins

On 11/25/2014 01:22 PM, Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS wrote: > Hi All, > > I am facing some issues regarding Jenkins. Actually Jenkins is failing > and it is giving "NOT_REGISTERED" in some tests. > So, kindly let me know what does "NOT_REGISTERED" mean here. > > Build failed (check pipeline). For info

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues regarding Jenkins

On 11/25/2014 07:30 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 11/25/2014 01:22 PM, Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I am facing some issues regarding Jenkins. Actually Jenkins is failing >> and it is giving "NOT_REGISTERED" in some tests. >> So, kindly let me know what does "NOT_REGISTERED" mea

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon]

On 25/11/14 00:09, David Lyle wrote: > I am pleased to nominate Thai Tran and Cindy Lu to horizon-core. > > Both Thai and Cindy have been contributing significant numbers of high > quality reviews during Juno and Kilo cycles. They are consistently > among the top non-core reviewers. They are also

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Versioned objects cross project sessions next steps

On Nov 24, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 11/24/2014 03:11 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >> Dan Smith wrote: 3. vish brought up one draw back of versioned objects: the difficulty in cherry picking commits for stable branches - Is this a show stopper?. >>> >>> After some discussion

[openstack-dev] [nova] [ironic] how to remove check-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ssh on Nova check

When at Summit I discovered that check-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ssh is now voting on Nova check queue. The reasons given is that the Nova team ignored the interface contract that was being provided to Ironic, broke them, so the Ironic team pushed for co-gating (which basically means the interface co

[openstack-dev] [FUEL] Zabbix in HA mode

Hello All, Im working on Zabbix implementation which include HA support. Zabbix server should be deployed on all controllers in HA mode. Currently we have dedicated role 'zabbix-server', which does not support more than one zabbix-server. Instead of this we will move monitoring solution (zabbi

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Integration tests on the gate

Hi folks, You may have noticed a new job in the check queue for Horizon patches, gate-horizon-dsvm-integration. This job runs the integration tests suite from our repository. [1] The job is marked as non-voting but *it is meant to pass.* The plan is to leave it that way for a couple of weeks to m

Re: [openstack-dev] [Telco] [NFV] [Heat] Telco Orchestration

Angus, do you have specific questions? We could describe in detail what we mean with all these abbreviations.. ) This is kind of telco slang, but surely there is a need to describe this in more detail for OpenStack Community should the need be. Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yuriy Babenko

Re: [openstack-dev] [FUEL] Zabbix in HA mode

Rob Basham Cloud Systems Software Architecture 971-344-1999 Bartosz Kupidura wrote on 11/25/2014 05:21:59 AM: > From: Bartosz Kupidura > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Date: 11/25/2014 05:26 AM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [FUEL] Zabbix in HA mode > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] New config options, no default change

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 16/11/14 20:17, Jay S. Bryant wrote: > All, > > This is a question I have been struggling with for Cinder recently. > Where do we draw the line on backports. How do we handle config changes? > > One thing for Cinder I am also considering, in ad

[openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] which core team members are diving into - http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1373513

There is currently a review stream coming into Tempest to add Cinder v2 tests in addition to the Cinder v1 tests. At the same time the currently biggest race fail in the gate related to the projects is http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1373513 - which is cinder related. I believe these

Re: [openstack-dev] [Telco] [NFV] [Heat] Telco Orchestration

Hi Angus, Am 25.11.2014 um 12:48 schrieb Angus Salkeld : > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Marc Koderer wrote: > Hi all, > > as discussed during our summit sessions we would like to expand the scope > of the Telco WG (aka OpenStack NFV group) and start working > on the orchestration topic (ETSI

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Reactive enforcement specs

Hi All, Since the meeting time would be 1:00am in the morning in China, I'm afraid I probably won't make it at IRC. As I have left comments on policy-event-trigger and explicit-reactive-enforcement, my colleague and I are interested in these specs, and would like to provide work on coding accordin

Re: [openstack-dev] [FUEL] Zabbix in HA mode

Bartosz, It is obviously possible to install zabbix on the master nodes and put it under pacemaker control. But it seems very strange for me to monitor something with software located on the nodes that you are monitoring. On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Bartosz Kupidura wrote: > Hello All, > >

[openstack-dev] licenses

What is the license that should be used for specs and for the code? While all the code I had seen is under Apache 2 license, many of the specs are under CCPL-3 license. Is that the guidance? Thanks, Arkady ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lis

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Asia friendly IRC meeting time

On 11/25/2014 02:37 AM, Zhidong Yu wrote: I know it's difficult to find a time good for both US, Europe and Asia. I suggest we could have two different meeting series with different time, i.e. US/Europe meeting this week, US/Asia meeting next week, and so on. i'd be ok with alternating week sch

[openstack-dev] [swift] [qa] which test configs does the swift team find useful

As we are trying to do smart disaggregation of tests in the gate, I think it's important to figure out which test configurations seem to be actually helping, and which aren't. As the swift team has long had a functional test job, this seems like a good place to start. (Also the field deploy / upgra

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] which core team members are diving into - http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1373513

On 11/25/2014 8:11 AM, Sean Dague wrote: There is currently a review stream coming into Tempest to add Cinder v2 tests in addition to the Cinder v1 tests. At the same time the currently biggest race fail in the gate related to the projects is http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1373513

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Asia friendly IRC meeting time

+1 for me, too. But I agree with Mike -- we need input from Saratov and similar time zones. I think though that the folks in Saratov generally try to shift hours anyway, to better align with the rest of us. So I think something that works for the US will likely work for them. Trev On Tue, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [ironic] how to remove check-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ssh on Nova check

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:02:56AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > When at Summit I discovered that check-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ssh is > now voting on Nova check queue. The reasons given is that the Nova team > ignored the interface contract that was being provided to Ironic, broke > them, so the Iron

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [ironic] how to remove check-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ssh on Nova check

On 11/25/2014 10:07 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:02:56AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: >> When at Summit I discovered that check-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ssh is >> now voting on Nova check queue. The reasons given is that the Nova team >> ignored the interface contract that was

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Asia friendly IRC meeting time

On 11/25/2014 02:37 AM, Zhidong Yu wrote: Current meeting time: 18:00UTC: Moscow (9pm)China(2am) US West(10am) My proposal: 18:00UTC: Moscow (9pm)China(2am) US West(10am) 00:00UTC: Moscow (3am)China(8am) US West(4pm) fyi, a number of us are UW East (US W

[openstack-dev] [heat] [qa] gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-heat-slow future

So as I was waiting for other tests to return, I started looking through our existing test lists. gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-heat-slow has been slowly evaporating, and I'm no longer convinced that it does anything useful (and just burns test nodes). The entire output of the job is currently as fol

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] which core team members are diving into - http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1373513

On 11/25/2014 9:03 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 11/25/2014 8:11 AM, Sean Dague wrote: There is currently a review stream coming into Tempest to add Cinder v2 tests in addition to the Cinder v1 tests. At the same time the currently biggest race fail in the gate related to the projects is http

[openstack-dev] Hyper-V Meeting

Hi All, Due to the upcoming holidays and lack of quorum I'm going to cancel the meeting for this week. We will resume with the usual Hyper-V meeting next week. Cheers, p ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Discussion on cm_api for global requirement

On 11/24/2014 01:22 PM, Trevor McKay wrote: Hello all, at our last Sahara IRC meeting we started discussing whether or not to add a global requirement for cm_api.py https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130153/ One issue (but not the only issue) is that cm_api is not packaged for Fedora, Cento

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone]Flushing trusts

Hi Yasuo. Did you file an RFE for this? Udi. - Original Message - From: "Yasuo Kodera" To: "[email protected]" Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 2:00:42 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone]Flushing trusts Hi, We can use "keystone-manage token_flush" to DELETE db-recor

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] request_id deprecation strategy question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 21/10/14 11:52, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:27:19PM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:12 AM, gordon chung >> wrote: >> >>> The issue I'm highlighting is that those projects using the >>> code now >> have

Re: [openstack-dev] licenses

- Original Message - > From: "Arkady Kanevsky" > To: [email protected] > > What is the license that should be used for specs and for the code? > While all the code I had seen is under Apache 2 license, many of the specs > are under CCPL-3 license. > Is that the guidance? >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo][Neutron] Fork() safety and oslo.messaging

Hi Mehdi On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote: > > Hi, > > I think the main issue is the behavior of the API > of oslo-incubator/openstack/common/service.py, specially: > > * ProcessLauncher.launch_service(MyService()) > > And then the MyService have this behavior: > > class MyS

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] [qa] which test configs does the swift team find useful

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:03:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > As we are trying to do smart disaggregation of tests in the gate, I > think it's important to figure out which test configurations seem to be > actually helping, and which aren't. As the swift team has long had a > functional test job, t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo][Neutron] Fork() safety and oslo.messaging

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I will take a look to the neutron code, if I found a rpc usage before the os.fork(). With a basic devstack that use the ml2 plugin, I found at least two rpc usage before the os.fork() in neutron: https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [qa] gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-heat-slow future

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > So as I was waiting for other tests to return, I started looking through > our existing test lists. > > gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-heat-slow has been slowly evaporating, and I'm > no longer convinced that it does anything useful (and just burns t

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] [qa] which test configs does the swift team find useful

On 11/25/2014 10:54 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:03:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: >> As we are trying to do smart disaggregation of tests in the gate, I >> think it's important to figure out which test configurations seem to be >> actually helping, and which aren't. As t

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [qa] gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-heat-slow future

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:28:52AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > So as I was waiting for other tests to return, I started looking through > our existing test lists. > > gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-heat-slow has been slowly evaporating, and I'm > no longer convinced that it does anything useful (and jus

[openstack-dev] [nova] nova host-update gives error 'Virt driver does not implement host disabled status'

Hi, I'm trying to reproduce the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1259535. While trying to issue the command, nova host-update --status disable machine1, an error is thrown saying, ERROR (HTTPNotImplemented): Virt driver does not implement host disabled > status. (HTTP 501) (Request-ID: r

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] [qa] which test configs does the swift team find useful

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:01:04AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/25/2014 10:54 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:03:41AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > >> As we are trying to do smart disaggregation of tests in the gate, I > >> think it's important to figure out which test c

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2 Agent][Debt] Bootstrapping an L2 agent debt repayment task force

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:59 AM, henry hly wrote: > Hi Armando, > > Indeed agent-less solution like external controller is very > interesting, and in some certain cases it has advantage over agent > solution, e.g. software installation is prohibited on Compute Node. > > However, Neutron Agent has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo][Neutron] Fork() safety and oslo.messaging

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mmmm... I don't think it's that clear (re: an application issue). I mean, yes - the application is doing the os.fork() at the 'wrong' time, but where is this made clear in the oslo.messaging API documentation? I think this is the real issue her

[openstack-dev] [sec] [ossg] Introducing Bandit code security analyzer

Hi all - Bandit is a Python AST-based static analyzer from the OpenStack Security Group. Unlike other static code analysis tools in the OpenStack ecosystem such as hacking and flake8, Bandit was purpose-built to help find security vulnerabilities. Bandit has a wiki page at: https://wiki.opens

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] why do image properties control per-instance settings?

Hi Blairo, Like you mention, I think one of the major reasons for have properties set at the image level is that certain properties depend on an OS which support the features involved. In this regard, being able to say that an image "supports" a particular feature, and then being able to set it o

Re: [openstack-dev] No PROTOCOL_SSLv3 in Python 2.7 in Sid since 3 days

On 11/23/2014 06:01 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > but we shouldn't > backport a patch which suddenly breaks someone's cloud because they > made a conscious decision to configure it to use SSLv3 for RPC > communication. I'm having a hard time figuring out in which case it would make sense to do so. H

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Change diagnostic snapshot compression algoritm

Thank you all for your feedback. Request postponed to the next release. We will compare available solutions. On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Vladimir Kuklin wrote: > guys, there is already pxz utility in ubuntu repos. let's test it > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski < >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

On 11/22/2014 04:39 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > Simply having a git repository does not imply that its source. > > In fact, if its considered compiled (minified), I'm thinking the debian rules > would prevent sourcing from it? > > Thanks, > Kevin Indeed, we don't package minified sources. Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [FUEL] Zabbix in HA mode

Hello Vladimir, I agree. But in most cases, zabbix-server would be moved from failed node by pacemaker. Moreover some clients dont want to „waste” 3 additional servers only for monitoring. As i said, this is only first drop of zabbix HA. Later we can allow user to deploy zabbix-server not only

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

On 11/21/2014 08:31 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > >> On Nov 21, 2014, at 3:59 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> >>> >>> I'm not sure I understand the meaning behind this question. "bower >>> install angular" downloads a bower package called "angular". >> >> Isn't there is a simple URL that I may use with

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] How to run tempest tests

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:49:27AM +0100, Angelo Matarazzo wrote: > Sorry for my previous message with wrong subject > > Hi all, > By reading the tempest documentation page [1] a user can run tempest tests > by using whether testr or run_tempest.sh or tox. > > What is the best practice? > run_tem

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Splitting up the assignment component

> On Nov 25, 2014, at 4:25 AM, Henry Nash wrote: > > Hi > > As most of you know, we have approved a spec > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129397/) to split the assignments component > up into two pieces, and the code (divided up into a series of patches) is > currently in review (https://

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Handling soft delete for instance rows in a new cells database

> I can't comment on other projects, but Nova definitely needs the soft > delete in the main nova database. Perhaps not for every table, but > there is definitely code in the code base which uses it right now. > Search for read_deleted=True if you're curious. Just to save people a bit of time, it'

[openstack-dev] [pecan] [WSME] Different content-type in request and response

Hi, folks! I try to create a controller which should receive one http content-type in request but it should be another content-type in response. I tried to use pecan and wsme decorators for controller's methods. I just want to receive text on server and send json-encoded string from server (reque

Re: [openstack-dev] [FUEL] Zabbix in HA mode

Regarding the licensing, it should not be an issue because we provide all source code (if not as git repos, then as source RPMs/DEBs). On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Bartosz Kupidura wrote: > Hello Vladimir, > I agree. But in most cases, zabbix-server would be moved from failed node > by pacem

Re: [openstack-dev] Where should Schema files live?

> I think Doug's suggestion of keeping the schema files in-tree and pushing > them to a well-known tarball maker in a build step is best so far. > > It's still a little clunky, but not as clunky as having to sync two repos. Yes, I tend to agree. So just to confirm that my understanding lines u

[openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] regression in Juno tree

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, we've introduced a regression when backporting the following patch [1] which shows up as metadata proxy process not spawned for networks with a ipv6 subnet. There was no official Juno release that would include the patch though, yet. The iss

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Separate horizon and openstack_dashboard

On 17/11/14 14:43, Yves-Gwenaël Bourhis wrote: > Le 17/11/2014 14:19, Matthias Runge a écrit : > >> There is already horizon on pypi[1] >> >> IMHO this will lead only to more confusion. >> >> Matthias >> >> >> [1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/horizon/2012.2 > > Well the current "horizon" on Pypi

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Priorities for Kilo?

Hi, Based on today's meeting and previous discussions with Kyle, I've tried to put down as much on paper about what I'd like to get done this development cycle. I used some of the links that we swapped today in the IRC meeting, but I know right now that I didn't get everything we talked about. Pl

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues regarding Jenkins

On 2014-11-25 07:33:14 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote: > Right now all icehouse jobs are showing up as NOT_REGISTERED. It's > cross project and current. This should be solved now for any dsvm icehouse jobs started since 15:00 UTC today. Contributing factors: 1. We restarted Zuul and it doesn't

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] New meeting room and time!

As discussed on this list previously [0] and agreed to in the last meeting [1], our weekly IRC meeting time is changing to better accommodate the many active contributors we have who are not well served by the current meeting time. The new meeting time will alternate between 1700 UTC on Mondays an

[openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] Meeting Reminder - Wednesday @ 2200 UTC

Hi all, Just a reminder - there is a Telco working group meeting at 2200 UTC on Wednesday in #openstack-meeting. If you have items you wish to add to the agenda please add them to the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nfv-meeting-agenda Note that I fully expect attendance will tak

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] [qa] which test configs does the swift team find useful

This is great! Sean, I agree with your analysis. gate-swift-pep8 (yes) gate-swift-docs (yes) gate-swift-python27 (yes) gate-swift-tox-func (yes) check-swift-dsvm-functional (yes) check-tempest-dsvm-full(to further ensure glance/heat/cinder checking) check-grenade-dsvm (I can go either wa

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone Using the Open Solaris ZFS Driver?

Monty, I agree that upgrade is not a significant concern right now if the existing driver is not working. Drew, I am having trouble following where you guys are currently at with this work. I would like to help get you guys up and going during Kilo. I am concerned that maybe there is conf

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Proposal for new Glance core reviewers

Hi all, Please consider this email as a nomination for Erno and Alex (CC) for adding them to the list of Glance core reviewers. Over the last cycle, both of them have been doing good work with reviews, participating in the project discussions as well as taking initiatives to creatively improve

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] [qa] which test configs does the swift team find useful

On 11/25/2014 02:46 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > This is great! > > Sean, I agree with your analysis. > > gate-swift-pep8 (yes) > gate-swift-docs (yes) > gate-swift-python27 (yes) > gate-swift-tox-func (yes) > check-swift-dsvm-functional (yes) > check-tempest-dsvm-full(to further ensure glance

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Proposal for new Glance core reviewers

+1 for both! Congrats :) On Nov 25, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Nikhil Komawar mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, Please consider this email as a nomination for Erno and Alex (CC) for adding them to the list of Glance core reviewers. Over the last cycle, both of them have been doing

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [qa] gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-heat-slow future

On 26/11/14 05:05, Matthew Treinish wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:28:52AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: So as I was waiting for other tests to return, I started looking through our existing test lists. gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-heat-slow has been slowly evaporating, and I'm no longer convinced t

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [qa] gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-heat-slow future

On 11/25/2014 03:33 PM, Steve Baker wrote: > On 26/11/14 05:05, Matthew Treinish wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:28:52AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: >>> So as I was waiting for other tests to return, I started looking through >>> our existing test lists. >>> >>> gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-heat-slo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

On Wed Nov 26 2014 at 3:36:27 AM Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 11/21/2014 08:31 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > > > >> On Nov 21, 2014, at 3:59 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> I'm not sure I understand the meaning behind this question. "bower > >>> install angular" downloads a bower package c

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] the future of angularjs development in Horizon

On 11/25/2014 03:40 PM, Richard Jones wrote: > On Wed Nov 26 2014 at 3:36:27 AM Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> On 11/21/2014 08:31 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: >>> On Nov 21, 2014, at 3:59 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand the meaning behind this question. "bower

Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation of Python 2.6 CI Testing

Just a reminder, the deprecation of the 2.6 python testing is planned for the 30th of November, Andreas On 10/24/2014 02:31 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello, > > At the Atlanta summit there was a session on removing python2.6 > testing/support from the OpenStack Kilo release [0]. The Infra team i

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] which core team members are diving into - http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1373513

On Nov 25, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 11/25/2014 9:03 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> >> >> On 11/25/2014 8:11 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >>> There is currently a review stream coming into Tempest to add Cinder v2 >>> tests in addition to the Cinder v1 tests. At the same time t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] proposal: alternating weekly meeting time [doodle poll created]

Thanks! On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 3:15:49 AM Yves-Gwenaël Bourhis < [email protected]> wrote: > > > Le 24/11/2014 04:20, Richard Jones a écrit : > > Thanks everyone, I've closed the poll. I'm sorry to say that there's no > > combination of two timeslots which allows everyone to atten

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] which core team members are diving into - http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1373513

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 01:22:01PM -0800, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Matt Riedemann > wrote: > > > > > > > On 11/25/2014 9:03 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 11/25/2014 8:11 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > >>> There is currently a review stream coming int

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone Using the Open Solaris ZFS Driver?

On 11/25/14, 12:56 PM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: > Monty, > > I agree that upgrade is not a significant concern right now if the > existing driver is not working. > > Drew, > > I am having trouble following where you guys are currently at with this > work. I would like to help get you guys up and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] How to run tempest tests

Hi, Thanjs for clearing that up... I had a hard time understanding the screws before I went with testr. Regards, Vineet On 25 Nov 2014 17:46, "Matthew Treinish" wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:49:27AM +0100, Angelo Matarazzo wrote: > > Sorry for my previous message with wrong subject > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][NFV][Third-party] CI for NUMA, SR-IOV, and other features that can't be tested on current infra.

- Original Message - > From: "Daniel P. Berrange" > To: "Dan Smith" > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:43:14PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:36:18AM -0800, Dan Smith wrote: > > > > That sounds like something worth exploring at least, I didn't know > > > > ab

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] proposal: alternating weekly meeting time [doodle poll created]

Thanks Richard for setting up the poll. Today, we finalized on the new meeting times. The decision is to meet at alternating times, 2000 UTC and 1200 UTC, on Weds. The meetings will remain in openstack-meeting-3. A schedule of upcoming meeting times has been added to https://wiki.openstack.org/wi

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] kilo graduation plans

On 11/18/2014 05:11 PM, Sachi King wrote: > On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 02:06:02 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: >> During our “Graduation Schedule” summit session we worked through the list >> of modules remaining the in the incubator. Our notes are in the etherpad >> [1], but as part of the "Write

Re: [openstack-dev] No PROTOCOL_SSLv3 in Python 2.7 in Sid since 3 days

Could someone take over my patch? :) > I'm quite busy doing other things, and it isn't my role to work on such > things directly. I often send a patch here and there when I see fit, but > here, I don't think I'm the best person to do so. > > I updated the patch based on the comments so far: https:/

[openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] pxe-boot

Hi all, my team and I are working on pxe boot feature very similar to the "Discless VM" one in Active blueprint list[1] The blueprint [2] is no longer active and we created a new spec [3][4]. Nova core reviewers commented our spec and the first and the most important objection is that ther

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] pxe-boot

On 11/25/2014 05:33 PM, Angelo Matarazzo wrote: > > Hi all, > my team and I are working on pxe boot feature very similar to the > "Discless VM" one in Active blueprint list[1] > The blueprint [2] is no longer active and we created a new spec [3][4]. > > Nova core reviewers commented our spec and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [ironic] how to remove check-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ssh on Nova check

On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 7:20:00 AM Sean Dague wrote: > On 11/25/2014 10:07 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:02:56AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > >> When at Summit I discovered that check-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ssh is > >> now voting on Nova check queue. The reasons given is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon]

+1 for both! Yep, thanks for all the hard work! On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Ana Krivokapic wrote: > > On 25/11/14 00:09, David Lyle wrote: > > I am pleased to nominate Thai Tran and Cindy Lu to horizon-core. > > > > Both Thai and Cindy have been contributing significant numbers of high > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Telco] [NFV] [Heat] Telco Orchestration

Hi, In Murano we did couple projects related to networking orchestration. As NFV is a quite broad term I can say that Murano approach fits into it too. In our case we had bunch of virtual appliances with specific networking capabilities and requirements. Some of these appliances had to work togeth

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone Using the Open Solaris ZFS Driver?

On 14:37 Tue 25 Nov , Drew Fisher wrote: > > > On 11/25/14, 12:56 PM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: > > Monty, > > > > I agree that upgrade is not a significant concern right now if the > > existing driver is not working. > > > > Drew, > > > > I am having trouble following where you guys are curren

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] nova host-update gives error 'Virt driver does not implement host disabled status'

are you using libvirt ? it's not implemented ,guess your bug are talking about other hypervisors? the message was printed here: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/hosts.py#n236 Best Regards! Kevin (Chen) Ji 纪 晨 Engineer, zVM Development, CSTL No

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Handling soft delete for instance rows in a new cells database

Hi, Le 2014-11-24 17:20, Michael Still a écrit : Heya, This is a new database, so its our big chance to get this right. So, ideas welcome... Some initial proposals: - we do what we do in the current nova database -- we have a deleted column, and we set it to true when we delete the instance

  1   2   >