Thanks! On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 3:15:49 AM Yves-Gwenaël Bourhis < yves-gwenael.bour...@cloudwatt.com> wrote:
> > > Le 24/11/2014 04:20, Richard Jones a écrit : > > Thanks everyone, I've closed the poll. I'm sorry to say that there's no > > combination of two timeslots which allows everyone to attend a meeting. > > Of the 25 respondents, the best we can do is cater for 24 of you. > > > > Optimising for the maximum number of attendees, the potential meeting > > times are 2000 UTC Tuesday and 1000 UTC on one of Monday, Wednesday or > > Friday. In all three cases the only person who has indicated they cannot > > attend is Lifeless. > > > > Unfortunately, David has indicated that he can't be present at the > > Tuesday 2000 UTC slot. Optimising for him as a required attendee for > > both meetings means we lose an additional attendee, and gives us the > > Wednesday 2000 UTC slot and a few options: > > > > - Monday, Wednesday and Thursday at 1200 UTC (Lifeless and ygbo miss) > > 1200 UTC is perfect for me. > The doodle was proposing 1200 UTC to 1400 UTC and in the 2 hours > bandwidth I can not be sure to be there. but if it's 1200 "on the spot" > I can for sure :-) > Since I couldn't precise this on the doodle I didn't select this slot. A > one hour bandwidth would have allowed more precision but I understand > you concern that the doodle would have been to long to scroll. > > -- > Yves-Gwenaël Bourhis > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
