Aah! Yes-- you are correct. I was thinking a the load balancer level, not
the pool level. (Maybe we can clarify this distinction in the requirements
doc?)
But I would also be surprised if there are load balancers today that don't
intrinsically offer "active / backup pool membership" as a standar
: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki
Thanks for the input. I too was thinking "IP Access Control" could be solved
with the firewall service in Neutron. To clarify what I mean check out our
current API docs on this feature
here<http://docs.rackspace.com/loadbalancers
.org>
> Date: Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:35 AM
>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki
>
>
>
>>>>- Active/Passi
t for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:35 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Req
] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki
Hi y'all!
It's good to be back, eh!
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Eugene Nikanorov
mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
* Active/Passive Failover
* I think this is solved with multiple pools.
The multiple pools support that is comi
>
>>>- Active/Passive Failover
>>> - I think this is solved with multiple pools.
>>>
>>> The multiple pools support that is coming with L7 rules is to support
>>> content-switching based on L7 HTTP information (URL, headers, etc.). There
>>> is no support today for an active vs. passive p
pment Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki
Hi folks, my comments inlined:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Youcef Laribi
mailto:youcef.lar...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Jorge,
Th
Hi y'all!
It's good to be back, eh!
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Eugene Nikanorov
wrote:
>
>>- Active/Passive Failover
>> - I think this is solved with multiple pools.
>>
>> The multiple pools support that is coming with L7 rules is to support
>> content-switching based on L7 HTTP
t; *From:* Jorge Miramontes [mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:44 AM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki
>
>
>
> Oleg, thanks for
better fit in that service?
Youcef
From: Jorge Miramontes [mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:44 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki
Oleg, thanks for the update
2014 7:32 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki
Hi Jorge,
Thanks for taking care of the page. I've added priorities, although I'm n
+1
-Original Message-
From: Ryan O'Hara [mailto:roh...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:37 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements Wiki
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:57:15PM +,
Hi Jorge,
Thanks for taking care of the page. I've added priorities, although I'm not
sure we need precise priority weights.
Those features that still have '?' need further clarification.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Oleg Bondarev wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> Thanks for taking
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:57:15PM +, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
> Hey Neutron LBaaS folks,
>
> Per last week's IRC meeting I have created a preliminary requirements &
> use case wiki page. I requested adding such a page since there appears to
> be a lot of new interest in load balancing and feel
Hi Jorge,
Thanks for taking care of this and bringing it all together! This will be
really useful for LBaaS discussions.
I updated the wiki to include L7 rules support and also marking already
implemented requirements.
Thanks,
Oleg
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jorge Miramontes <
jorge.miram
Hey Neutron LBaaS folks,
Per last week's IRC meeting I have created a preliminary requirements &
use case wiki page. I requested adding such a page since there appears to
be a lot of new interest in load balancing and feel that we need a
structured way to align everyone's interest in the project.
16 matches
Mail list logo
