Aah! Yes-- you are correct. I was thinking a the load balancer level, not the pool level. (Maybe we can clarify this distinction in the requirements doc?)
But I would also be surprised if there are load balancers today that don't intrinsically offer "active / backup pool membership" as a standard feature. Eugene: This is somewhat similar to weighting, but not exactly the same thing. Stephen On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Youcef Laribi <youcef.lar...@citrix.com>wrote: > Stephen, > > > > I don’t think the active/passive pools feature is referring to the HA of > loadbalancers. This is about the ability to divide the list of members > servicing load-balanced requests into 2 groups: The first one is active and > the second one is passive (or a backup pool). If all the members in the > first pool are down, then the passive pool’s members become serving traffic > for that VIP. > > > > Youcef > -- Stephen Balukoff Blue Box Group, LLC (800)613-4305 x807
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
