Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 12:12 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>> On 10/30/2014 04:53 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez
>>> wrote:
>>>
Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grob
On 10/30/2014 12:12 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 04:53 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Jay Pipes wrote:
On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
>> Any chance we
Hi all, I've add a new item (No. 34 in the bottom) for Disaster Reover
topics
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Joe Gordon
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Joe Gordon
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez
>>> wrote:
>>>
Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/29/20
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Joe Gordon
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Jay Pipes wrote:
>>> > On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>> >> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochell
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez
> wrote:
>
>> Jay Pipes wrote:
>> > On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> >> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
>> >>> Any chance we could use the opening to move eith
On 10/30/2014 04:53 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez
> wrote:
>
>> Jay Pipes wrote:
>>> On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
> Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack
>>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Jay Pipes wrote:
> > On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> >> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
> >>> Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack
> >>> session or the logging session from their cur
Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
>>> Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack
>>> session or the logging session from their current joint (and
>>> conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be
Thanks for your confirmation.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
From: Thierry Carrez [thie...@openstack.org]
Sent: 29 October 2014 16:55
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit
On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack
session or the logging session from their current joint (and
conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be appreciated at both.
And I'd re
On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
> Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack
> session or the logging session from their current joint (and
> conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be appreciated at both.
> And I'd really like to be at both. I'd say the Ref
29, 2014 6:35 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track
On 10/29/2014 07:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project
On 10/29/2014 07:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:
http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa
If you have any schedule changes to propose f
On 10/29/2014 08:20 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 10/29/2014 07:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>> A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:
>>>
>>> http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#
On 10/29/2014 07:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:
>>
>> http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa
>>
>> If you have any schedule changes
On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:
>
> http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa
>
> If you have any schedule changes to propose for really bad conflicts,
> please l
joehuang wrote:
> Is the "cascading" included in the session "Approaches for scaling out" [1] ?
Yes it is. The goal of the session is to get the proponents of the
various "scaling out" approaches in the same room so that they compare
notes and potentially converge.
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
m]
Sent: 29 October 2014 5:22
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track
A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:
http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa
A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track:
http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa
If you have any schedule changes to propose for really bad conflicts,
please let me know. We really tried to minimize conflicts, but it
20 matches
Mail list logo