On 10/29/2014 07:22 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 10/28/2014 05:22 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: >> A draft schedule has been posted for the cross-project design summit track: >> >> http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cross-project+workshops#.VFAFFXVGjUa >> >> If you have any schedule changes to propose for really bad conflicts, >> please let me know. We really tried to minimize conflicts, but it's >> impossible to resolve them all. >> >> The next steps are to identify session leads and get the leads to write >> session descriptions to put on the schedule. We're collecting both at >> the top of the proposals etherpad: >> >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-summit-topics >> >> If you were the proposer of one of these sessions and are not already >> listed as the session lead, please add yourself. If you'd like to >> volunteer to lead a session that doesn't have a lead, please speak up. >> >> For the sessions you are leading, please draft a description on the >> etherpad that can be used for the session on sched.org. >> >> Thank you! >> > > I was trying to track down the origin of the "Debugging Gate Failures" > submission - > http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/event/5cfc92906adc5830355ddcedbb95d977 > (through matching hex author colors in etherpad... fun!) > > It looks like John G copied it over because someone (lost to the mists > of time) put it in the Nova ideas etherpad. > > I'd actually argue that a 40 minute interactive session without much > prep isn't going to be all that useful (and honestly probably a terrible > experience for all parties involved). This is a topic that Jay, Dan, and > I have discussed for doing an upcoming bootstrapping hour on (which also > means it would have a long term archived version), and I think that's > probably a better way to do a thing like this. > > As there is no owner for this, there is no one to pull it out of the > agenda. But I think it's something that should be considered.
I'm fine with pulling it. If so, we can give something else 2 timeslots, or pull another topic back in. Any suggestions for one that could use 2 slots? On a related note, next time around, if we use etherpads for proposals again, we should really use some common formatting for proposals, and require a session lead listed. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
