Russell Bryant wrote: > On 10/30/2014 12:12 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: >> On 10/30/2014 04:53 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Jay Pipes wrote: >>>>> On 10/29/2014 09:07 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: >>>>>> On 10/29/2014 06:46 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: >>>>>>> Any chance we could use the opening to move either the Refstack >>>>>>> session or the logging session from their current joint (and >>>>>>> conflicting) time (15:40)? QA really would be appreciated at both. >>>>>>> And I'd really like to be at both. I'd say the Refstack one would go >>>>>>> better in the debug slot, as the API stuff is sort of related to the >>>>>>> logging. Switching with one of the 14:50 sessions might also work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just hoping. I really want great participation at all of these >>>>>>> sessions. >>>>>> >>>>>> The "gate debugging" session is most likely going to be dropped at this >>>>>> point. I don't see a big problem with moving the refstack one to that >>>>>> slot (the first time). >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone else have a strong opinion on this? >>>>> >>>>> Sounds good to me. >>>> >>>> Sounds good. >>>> >>> >>> With the "gate debugging" session being dropped due to being the wrong >>> format to be productive, we now need a new session. After looking over the >>> etherpad of proposed cross project sessions I think there is one glaring >>> omission: the SDK. In the "Kilo Cycle Goals Exercise" thread [0] having a >>> real SDK was one of the top answers. Many folks had great responses that >>> clearly explained the issues end users are having [1]. As for who could >>> lead a session like this I have two ideas: Monty Taylor, who had one of the >>> most colorful explanations to why this is so critical, or Dean Troyer, one >>> of the few people actually working on this right now. I think it would be >>> embarrassing if we had no cross project session on SDKs, since there >>> appears to be a consensus that the making life easier for the end user is a >>> high priority. >>> >>> The current catch is, the free slot is now at 15:40, so it would compete >>> with 'How to Tackle Technical Debt in Kilo,' a session which I expect to be >>> very popular with the same people who would be interested in attending a >>> SDK session. >> >> I'm happy to lead this, to co-lead with Dean or to just watch Dean lead >> it - although I can promise in any format to start off the time period >> with some very colorful ranting. I think I'm less necessary in the tech >> debt session, as other than "yes, please get rid of it" I probably don't >> have too much more input that will be helpful. > > OK, awesome! I'll put you down for now. > > I could use a proposed session description to put on sched.org. > Otherwise, I'll just make something up.
+1 on the topic. Thanks Joe for completing the circle we started with the TC candidates priorities ! I'd make it about the "End user experience" in general. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
