Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Open API 3.0 for OpenStack API

Hi Edison, Sorry for the delay. Please see inline... Cheers, Gilles On 07/09/18 12:03, Edison Xiang wrote: Hey gilles, Thanks your introduction for GraphQL and Relay. > GraphQL and OpenAPI have a different feature scope and both have pros and cons. I totally agree with you. They can work

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

Hi Matt, Thanks for the input, I guess I should use ' http://git.openstack.org/static/openstack.png' which will definitely work. Clark, Matt, Kindly let me know your opinion about the same. Thanks & Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 10:20 AM Matthew Treinish wrote: > > > O

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

On October 5, 2018 12:11:51 AM EDT, Abhishek Kekane wrote: >Hi Clark, > >Thank you for the inputs. I have verified the logs and found that >mostly >image import web-download import method related tests are failing. >Now in this test [1] we are trying to download a file from ' >https://www.openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][neutron-release] feature/graphql branch rebase

Hey Neutron folks, I'm just reiterating the request. Thanks On 20/06/18 11:34, Gilles Dubreuil wrote: Could someone from the Neutron release group rebase feature/graphql branch against master/HEAD branch please? Regards, Gilles __

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

Hi Clark, Thank you for the inputs. I have verified the logs and found that mostly image import web-download import method related tests are failing. Now in this test [1] we are trying to download a file from ' https://www.openstack.org/assets/openstack-logo/2016R/OpenStack-Logo-Horizontal.eps.zip

[openstack-dev] [glance] spec-lite: Embed validation data in locations

I put together an etherpad outlining the changes to Iain's spec-lite [0] that we discussed at today's glance meeting: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-spec-lite-stein-locations-with-checksum It's probably best to leave comments on the etherpad. cheers, brian [0] https://review.openstack.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Searchlight] Always build universal wheels

Thank Jeremy, Doug for explaining. On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 6:54 AM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Jeremy Stanley writes: > > > On 2018-10-04 23:11:22 +0900 (+0900), Trinh Nguyen wrote: > > [...] > >> Please avoid adding universal wheels to the project setup.cfg. > > [...] > > > > Why would you avoid als

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/os-log-merger failed

On 2018-10-04 18:21:50 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > Jeremy Stanley writes: > > > On 2018-10-04 17:57:06 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > > [...] > >> HTTPError: 400 Client Error: Invalid value for classifiers. Error: > >> 'Topic:: Utilities' is not a valid choice for this field

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/os-log-merger failed

Jeremy Stanley writes: > On 2018-10-04 17:57:06 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] >> HTTPError: 400 Client Error: Invalid value for classifiers. Error: >> 'Topic:: Utilities' is not a valid choice for this field for url: >> https://upload.pypi.org/legacy/ >> >> I'm not aware of a

[openstack-dev] [nova] agreement on how to specify options that impact scheduling and configuration

While discussing the "Add HPET timer support for x86 guests" blueprint[1] one of the items that came up was how to represent what are essentially flags that impact both scheduling and configuration. Eric Fried posted a spec to start a discussion[2], and a number of nova developers met on a han

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/os-log-merger failed

On 2018-10-04 17:57:06 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] > HTTPError: 400 Client Error: Invalid value for classifiers. Error: > 'Topic:: Utilities' is not a valid choice for this field for url: > https://upload.pypi.org/legacy/ > > I'm not aware of any way to test those values easily

Re: [openstack-dev] Sphinx testing fun

Stephen Finucane writes: > On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 07:21 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Stephen Finucane writes: [snip] >> > Anyway, we can go figure out what's changed here and handle it but this >> > is, at best, going to be a band aid. The fact is 'sphinx_testing' is >> > unmaintained and has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/os-log-merger failed

z...@openstack.org writes: > Build failed. > > - release-openstack-python > http://logs.openstack.org/b4/b4553baa59b1f13a57973f2a3cff9b57acf3d522/release/release-openstack-python/68d0da8/ > : POST_FAILURE in 5m 19s > - announce-release announce-release : SKIPPED > - propose-update-constraints pr

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Searchlight] Always build universal wheels

Jeremy Stanley writes: > On 2018-10-04 23:11:22 +0900 (+0900), Trinh Nguyen wrote: > [...] >> Please avoid adding universal wheels to the project setup.cfg. > [...] > > Why would you avoid also adding it to the setup.cfg? The change you > cited is merely to be able to continue building universal

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Community Meeting - October 10 - Strategic Area Governance Update

Following the interest in the first OpenStack Foundation community meeting, where we discussed the OpenStack Rocky release as well as quick updates from Kata, Airship, StarlingX and Zuul, we want to keep the community meetings going. The second community meeting will be October 10 at 8:00 PT / 15:0

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] bringing back formal TC meetings

On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:47:53PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-10-04 13:40:05 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > > TC members, please reply to this thread and indicate if you would > > find meeting at 1300 UTC on the first Thursday of every month > > acceptable, and of course

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] SmartNics with Ironic

Hi Julia, Apologize we were not able to be there to better represent the use case. PSB From: Julia Kreger Sent: Monday, October 1, 2018 11:07 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: isaku.yamah...@intel.com; Eyal Lavee Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neu

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][puppet] clearing the gate and landing patches to help CI

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 8:29 AM Alex Schultz wrote: > And master is blocked again. We need > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607952/ > > Thanks, > -Alex > I just got infra to put that patch on the top of the queue. We also need https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607904/ reviewed ASAP Thanks >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] bringing back formal TC meetings

On 4/10/18 1:47 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2018-10-04 13:40:05 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] TC members, please reply to this thread and indicate if you would find meeting at 1300 UTC on the first Thursday of every month acceptable, and of course include any other comments you migh

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] bringing back formal TC meetings

On 2018-10-04 13:40:05 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] > TC members, please reply to this thread and indicate if you would > find meeting at 1300 UTC on the first Thursday of every month > acceptable, and of course include any other comments you might > have (including alternate times).

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] bringing back formal TC meetings

On Oct 4 2018, at 1:40 pm, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > During the TC office hours today [1] we discussed the question of > resuming having formal meetings of the TC to ensure we are in compliance > with the section of the bylaws that says "The Technical Committee shall > meet at least quarterly." [

[openstack-dev] [tc] bringing back formal TC meetings

During the TC office hours today [1] we discussed the question of resuming having formal meetings of the TC to ensure we are in compliance with the section of the bylaws that says "The Technical Committee shall meet at least quarterly." [2] As not all TC members were present today, we decide to mov

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-26 and R-25, October 8-19

Welcome to the (biweekly for now) release countdown email. Just a quick reminder for this one. Development Focus - Team focus should be on spec approval and implementation for priority features. General Information --- Teams should now be making progress towards

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [all][tc] We're combining the lists!

Agreed with the merge.  null__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstac

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Searchlight] Always build universal wheels

On 2018-10-04 23:11:22 +0900 (+0900), Trinh Nguyen wrote: [...] > Please avoid adding universal wheels to the project setup.cfg. [...] Why would you avoid also adding it to the setup.cfg? The change you cited is merely to be able to continue building universal wheels for projects while the setup.c

Re: [openstack-dev] Sphinx testing fun

On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 07:21 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Stephen Finucane writes: > > > The tests in os-api-ref recently broke: > > > > > > http://logs.openstack.org/62/606362/1/check/openstack-tox-py35/8b709de/testr_results.html.gz > > > > Specifically, we're seeing errors likes this: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][puppet] clearing the gate and landing patches to help CI

And master is blocked again. We need https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607952/ Thanks, -Alex On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:02 AM Alex Schultz wrote: > > Hey Folks, > > Currently the tripleo gate is at 21 hours and we're continue to have > timeouts and now scenario001/004 (in queens/pike) appear to b

Re: [openstack-dev] Dose anyone have use Vitrage to build a mature project for RCA or any other purpose?

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:59 AM zhangwenqing <18800173...@163.com> wrote: > Thanks for your reply! > So how do you analyse the RCA?Do you ever use any statistics methods like > time series or mathine learning methods?Or just use the method that Vitrage > provides? > > > zhangwenqing > > Hi, So

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, at 12:16 AM, Abhishek Kekane wrote: > Hi, > Could you please point out some of the glance functional tests which are > failing and causing this resets? > I will like to put some efforts towards fixing those. http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/data/integrated_gate.html

[openstack-dev] [all][Searchlight] Always build universal wheels

Hi team, Not sure if anyone is aware of [1] in openstack-infra that is trying to always build universal wheels by default for all projects. Please avoid adding universal wheels to the project setup.cfg. Bests, [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607902/ -- *Trinh Nguyen* *www.edlab.xyz

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] I have some problems with Prometheus alarms in vitrage.

Hi, Can you please give us some more details about your scenario with Prometheus? Please try and give as many details as possible, so we can try to reproduce the bug. What do you mean by “if the alarm is resolved, the alarm manager makes a silence, or removes the alarm rule from Prometheus”? the

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] [infra] [qa] tuning some zuul jobs from "it works" to "proper"

On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Chris Dent wrote: I'd really like to see this become a real thing, so if I could get some help from tempest people on how to make it in line with expectations that would be great. I've written up the end game of what I'm trying to achieve in a bit more detail at https://anti

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][xenapi] can we deprecate the xenapi-specific 'nova-console' service?

On Thu, 2018-10-04 at 12:03 +, Bob Ball wrote: > Hi Melanie, > > We recommend using novncproxy_base_url with > vncserver_proxyclient_address set to the dom0's management IP > address. > > We don't currently use nova-console, so deprecation would be the best > approach. > > Thanks, > > Bob

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][xenapi] can we deprecate the xenapi-specific 'nova-console' service?

Hi Melanie, We recommend using novncproxy_base_url with vncserver_proxyclient_address set to the dom0's management IP address. We don't currently use nova-console, so deprecation would be the best approach. Thanks, Bob -Original Message- From: melanie witt [mailto:melwi...@gmail.com]

Re: [openstack-dev] Sphinx testing fun

Stephen Finucane writes: > The tests in os-api-ref recently broke: > > > http://logs.openstack.org/62/606362/1/check/openstack-tox-py35/8b709de/testr_results.html.gz > > Specifically, we're seeing errors likes this: > > ft1.1: > os_api_ref.tests.test_basic_example.TestBasicExample.test_rest

[openstack-dev] Sphinx testing fun

The tests in os-api-ref recently broke: http://logs.openstack.org/62/606362/1/check/openstack-tox-py35/8b709de/testr_results.html.gz Specifically, we're seeing errors likes this: ft1.1: os_api_ref.tests.test_basic_example.TestBasicExample.test_rest_method_StringException: Traceback (most

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge Computing

Geeg, Glance uses launchpad for blueprints and for specs you can refer to glance-specs repo. Thank you, Abhishek On Thu 4 Oct, 2018, 16:14 Waines, Greg, wrote: > I have not yet done a blueprint or spec for this in Glance. > > But can do that now. > > > > Is Glance using Launchpad or Storyboar

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance API Caching Enhancements for Edge Computing

I have not yet done a blueprint or spec for this in Glance. But can do that now. Is Glance using Launchpad or Storyboard ? Greg. From: Abhishek Kekane Reply-To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" Date: Thursday, October 4, 2018 at 2:08 AM To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" Subject: R

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

Hi, Could you please point out some of the glance functional tests which are failing and causing this resets? I will like to put some efforts towards fixing those. Thanks & Best Regards, Abhishek Kekane On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:14 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Wesley Hayutin writes: > > [snip]