Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 22:10 -0400, Dan Prince wrote: > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 08:06 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > > We're definitely deep into capacity issues, so it's going to be time to > > start making tougher decisions about things we decide aren't different > > enough to bother testing on every co

Re: [openstack-dev] mysql/mysql-python license "contamination" into openstack?

On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 12:13 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for the community viewpoint on whether there is any chance > of license contamination between mysql and nova. I realize that lawyers > would need to be involved for a proper ruling, but I'm curious about the > view o

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][pci] A couple of questions

? 2014?06?11? 05:09, Jiang, Yunhong ??: Hi, Robert For your first question, I suspect it's something wrong and should be 'devi_id', which is the hypervisor's identification for the device. I will leave Yongli to have more comments on it. sorry for later, this name is libvirt return

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Using saltstack as orchestrator for fuel

Dmitry, please read design doc attached to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization. I think it can serve as a good source of requirements which we have, and then we can see what tool is the best. Regards, On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Vladimir Kuklin wrote:

[openstack-dev] [Trove] Proposal to add sample configurations of admin_{user, tenant_name, password}

Hello folks, I'd like to propose following small changes to [filter:authtoken] section in default api-paste.ini: +admin_tenant_name = %SERVICE_TENANT_NAME% +admin_user = %SERVICE_USER% +admin_password = %SERVICE_PASSWORD% I created a new ticket [1] about this. Some of core OpenStack components

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed locking

On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 05:06:38 PM Julien Danjou wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Matthew Booth wrote: > > This looks interesting. It doesn't have hooks for fencing, though. > > > > What's the status of tooz? Would you be interested in adding fencing > > hooks? > > It's maintained and developer, we hav

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Review days? (open to ANYBODY and EVERYBODY)

John, +2 I am guilty of falling behind on reviews. Pulled in to a lot of other stuff since the summit ... and before. Having prescribed time on my calendar is a good idea. Just put it on my calendar. Jay On Jun 12, 2014 10:49 PM, "John Griffith" wrote: > Hey Everyone, > > So I've been notici

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Review days? (open to ANYBODY and EVERYBODY)

Hey Everyone, So I've been noticing some issues with regards to reviews in Cinder lately, namely we're not keeping up very well. Most of this is a math problem (submitters >> reviewers). We're up around 200+ patches in the queue, and a large number of them have no negative feedback but have just

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Specs repository update and the way forward

> Since Juno-1 is about to close, I wanted to give everyone an update on > Neutron's usage of the specs repository. These are observations from > using this since a few weeks before the Summit. I thought it would be > good to share with the broader community to see if other projects > using spec re

[openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder] hope to get any feedback about delay delete volume

Hi all, I have submit a blueprint about deferred deletion for volumes in cinder: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97034/ The implements of deferred deletion for volumes will introduce some complexity, to this point, there are different options in stackers. So we would like to get some

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review guidelines for API patches

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:56 AM, wu jiang wrote: > If one new feature relates to some API modifications, and its spec has > already involved the modifications' description, is it necessary to add one > more API spec here? > > If the new feature is already mentioned in a nova-spec then we don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review guidelines for API patches

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 6/12/2014 5:58 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Michael Still > > wrote: >> >> In light of the recent excitement around quota classes and the >> floating ip pollster

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-security] [Barbican][OSSG][Keystone] Mid-Cycle Meetup

- Original Message - > From: "Jamie Lennox" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 12:28:25 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-security] [Barbican][OSSG][Keystone] > Mid-Cycle Meetup > > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 16:

Re: [openstack-dev] [DriverLog] What to fix and when

On 06/12/2014 10:16 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 06/11/2014 04:57 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: >> Anita, I put the meeting on my schedule. >> >> Jay, can you be a back-up person? > > I can try. Unfortunately, I believe I am flying in to Stockholm on > Monday at the meeting time. > > If I get to my hotel

Re: [openstack-dev] masking X-Auth-Token in debug output - proposed consistency

Sorry to interrupt this discussion. Sean,  Since I'm working the neutron client code change, by looking at your code change to nova client, looks like only X-Auth-Token is taken care of in http_log_req. There is also password in header and token id in response. Any particular reason that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Review Dashboard based on gerrit-dash-creator

Can you please share a generated link? We might want to post in onto wiki too. Thanks, On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko < dborodae...@mirantis.com> wrote: > A better download link that remains valid through updates: > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/angdraug/gerrit-dash-cr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-security] [Barbican][OSSG][Keystone] Mid-Cycle Meetup

On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 16:29 -0700, Valerie Anne Fenwick wrote: > Hi FOlks > > I haven't seen anymore on this. Is this happening? If so, are there more > details? (location, agenda, etc). Thanks! Details: http://dolphm.com/openstack-keystone-hackathon-for-juno/ I think the agenda will be pushi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review guidelines for API patches

If one new feature relates to some API modifications, and its spec has already involved the modifications' description, is it necessary to add one more API spec here? On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:20 AM, wu jiang wrote: > +1 to Matt. > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Matt Riedemann < > mrie.

Re: [openstack-dev] Message level security plans. [barbican]

On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 23:22 +, Tiwari, Arvind wrote: > Thanks Nathan for your response. > > Still not very convinced for two separate service. > > Keystone authentication is not a mandatory requirement for Barbican, as per > design it can work without Keystone authentication. Rest (tempora

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review guidelines for API patches

+1 to Matt. On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 6/12/2014 8:58 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> >> >> On 6/12/2014 5:58 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Michael Still >> > wrote: >>> >>> In light of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

> an update after today's l3 meeting: > here's a new version of ryu bgp api patch. > http://sourceforge.net/p/ryu/mailman/message/32453021/ it has been merged to the ryu master. https://github.com/osrg/ryu.git here's formatted documentation: http://ryu.readthedocs.org/en/latest/library_bg

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:24 -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: > > On Jun 12, 2014 8:37 AM, "Sean Dague" wrote: > > > > On 06/12/2014 10:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > > > > On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > > >> On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote: > > >> > > >>> That's not cacthable in unit o

Re: [openstack-dev] how to install fuel on a esxi vm

Hi Wang, What do you mean by "not install"? Are there any errors in logs? What is the error message in UI? On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Wang Liming wrote: > hi all: > I install openstack with the fuel which version is 5.0 on a vmware esxi vm > the network is configed correctly ,but when d

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On 6/12/2014 5:11 PM, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Sean Dague wrote: We're definitely deep into capacity issues, so it's going to be time to start making tougher decisions about things we decide aren't different enough to bother testing on every commit. I think one

Re: [openstack-dev] [DriverLog] What to fix and when

On 06/11/2014 04:57 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: Anita, I put the meeting on my schedule. Jay, can you be a back-up person? I can try. Unfortunately, I believe I am flying in to Stockholm on Monday at the meeting time. If I get to my hotel in time for the meeting, I'll be on IRC. Best, -jay _

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 08:06 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > We're definitely deep into capacity issues, so it's going to be time to > start making tougher decisions about things we decide aren't different > enough to bother testing on every commit. In order to save resources why not combine some of the

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Michael Still wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> We're definitely deep into capacity issues, so it's going to be time to >> start making tougher decisions about things we decide aren't different >> enough to bother testing on every com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review guidelines for API patches

On 6/12/2014 8:58 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 6/12/2014 5:58 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Michael Still mailto:mi...@stillhq.com>> wrote: In light of the recent excitement around quota classes and the floating ip pollster, I think we should have a co

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review guidelines for API patches

On 6/12/2014 5:58 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Michael Still mailto:mi...@stillhq.com>> wrote: In light of the recent excitement around quota classes and the floating ip pollster, I think we should have a conversation about the review guidelines we'd

Re: [openstack-dev] NFV in OpenStack use cases and context

Hi Yathi The BP's I am referring too are the nic state aware scheduling (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nic-state-aware-scheduling ) and the PCI device capability aware scheduling (appears to have been deleted, will upload it again). I can see NFV utilising this for some apps we ha

Re: [openstack-dev] masking X-Auth-Token in debug output - proposed consistency

> I'm hoping we can just ACK this approach, and get folks to start moving > patches through the clients to clean this all up. just an fyi, in pyCADF, we obfuscate tokens similar to how credit cards are handled: by capturing a percentage of leading and trailing characters and substituting the mid

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed locking

Ironic has a simple lock mechanism for nodes to ensure that, if the hash ring rebalances while an operation is in progress, the second conductor doesn't trample on the work that the first conductor is doing until it's finished (and releases the lock). Right now, it's got a simple DB backing. We've

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Meaning of 204 from DELETE apis

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:05 AM, David Kranz wrote: > >> On 06/12/2014 05:27 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: >> >>> On 06/12/2014 05:17 PM, David Kranz wrote: >>> Tempest has a number of tests in various services for deleting objects that

[openstack-dev] [metrics] How to group activity in git/gerrit repositories

Hello folks, we're working on a quarterly report of activities in all our git and gerrit repositories to understand the dynamics of contributions across different dimensions. This report will be similar to what Bitergia produced at release time. I'd like to discuss more widely the format of how t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Refine engine <-> executor protocol

Design proposal for blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-engine-executor-protocol - Rename Executor to Worker. - Continue to use RPC server-client model in oslo.messaging for Engine and Worker protocol. - Use asynchronous call (cast) between Worker and Engi

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Meaning of 204 from DELETE apis

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:05 AM, David Kranz wrote: > On 06/12/2014 05:27 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > >> On 06/12/2014 05:17 PM, David Kranz wrote: >> >>> Tempest has a number of tests in various services for deleting objects >>> that mostly return 204. Many, but not all, of these tests go on to check

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: Fwd: Debian people don't like bash8 as a project name (Bug#748383: ITP: bash8 -- bash script style guide checker)

On Thu 12 Jun 2014 03:53:35 PM PDT, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > I understand your concerns here, and I totally get what you’re driving > at, but in the packaging world wouldn’t this make sense to call it > "python-bash8"? Now the binary, I can agree (for reasons outlined) > should probably not be name

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-security] [Barbican][OSSG][Keystone] Mid-Cycle Meetup

Hi FOlks I haven't seen anymore on this. Is this happening? If so, are there more details? (location, agenda, etc). Thanks! Valerie On 05/23/14 06:26 AM, Adam Young wrote: The Keystone team is going to be making sure the code that needs to be in by J2 is in. That means the API changes.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nova list can't return anything

OK， I will note that . Thank you ! *Best Regards！* *Chao Yan--**My twitter：Andy Yan @yanchao727 * *My Weibo：http://weibo.com/herewearenow --* 2014-06-12 23:56 GMT+08:00 Ben Nemec : > Please do not cross-p

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 19:52 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 06/11/2014 07:47 PM, Jamie Lennox wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:13 +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > >> On 12/06/14 08:18, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:57 +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > On 11/06/14 15:07, Jamie Len

Re: [openstack-dev] Message level security plans. [barbican]

Thanks Nathan for your response. Still not very convinced for two separate service. Keystone authentication is not a mandatory requirement for Barbican, as per design it can work without Keystone authentication. Rest (temporary session key generation, long-term keys ...) are feature gap which

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Review guidelines for API patches

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Michael Still wrote: > In light of the recent excitement around quota classes and the > floating ip pollster, I think we should have a conversation about the > review guidelines we'd like to see for API changes proposed against > nova. My initial proposal is: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: Fwd: Debian people don't like bash8 as a project name (Bug#748383: ITP: bash8 -- bash script style guide checker)

Hi Thomas, I felt a couple sentences here were reasonable to add (more than “don’t care” from before).  I understand your concerns here, and I totally get what you’re driving at, but in the packaging world wouldn’t this make sense to call it "python-bash8"? Now the binary, I can agree (for rea

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Nova/Olso] Periodic task coalescing

Sorry, didn't notice the list changed. On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Michael Still wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Tom Cammann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm addressing https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo/+bug/1326020 which is >> dealing with periodic tasks. >> >> There is currently a code

Re: [openstack-dev] Message level security plans. [barbican]

On 06/12/2014 03:16 PM, Tiwari, Arvind wrote: > Some thoughts out of the context of this email thread. > > As per my understanding of Kite, it is a subset of Barbican or there might be > minor gaps. If that is the true statement then what is the point of having a > services with duplicate feat

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Review guidelines for API patches

In light of the recent excitement around quota classes and the floating ip pollster, I think we should have a conversation about the review guidelines we'd like to see for API changes proposed against nova. My initial proposal is: - API changes should have an associated spec - API changes shoul

Re: [openstack-dev] [containers][nova][cinder] Cinder support in containers and unprivileged container-in-container

On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 21:57 +, Adrian Otto wrote: > Containers Team, > > The nova-docker developers are currently discussing options for > implementation for supporting mounting of Cinder volumes in > containers, and creation of unprivileged containers-in-containters. > Both of these currently

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: Fwd: Debian people don't like bash8 as a project name (Bug#748383: ITP: bash8 -- bash script style guide checker)

On 06/12/2014 02:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > I'd hate to think what these guys think of firefox, grub, thunderbird, > pidgin, zope, git, mercurial, etc, etc. I don't see what point you're trying to make here. Firefox & Thunderbird were renamed because of trademark issues with the Mozilla foundation

Re: [openstack-dev] Message level security plans. [barbican]

Some thoughts out of the context of this email thread. As per my understanding of Kite, it is a subset of Barbican or there might be minor gaps. If that is the true statement then what is the point of having a services with duplicate feature set? Why not port all the Kite feature to Barbican an

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > We're definitely deep into capacity issues, so it's going to be time to > start making tougher decisions about things we decide aren't different > enough to bother testing on every commit. I think one of the criticisms that could be made about

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mid-cycle meetup for Cinder devs

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:16 PM, D'Angelo, Scott wrote: > During the June 11 #openstack-cinder meeting we discussed a mid-cycle > meetup. The agenda is To be Determined. > > I have inquired and HP in Fort Collins, CO has room and network > connectivity available. There were some dates that worke

[openstack-dev] [containers][nova][cinder] Cinder support in containers and unprivileged container-in-container

Containers Team, The nova-docker developers are currently discussing options for implementation for supporting mounting of Cinder volumes in containers, and creation of unprivileged containers-in-containters. Both of these currently require CAP_SYS_ADMIN[1] which is problematic because if grant

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Meaning of 204 from DELETE apis

On 06/12/2014 05:27 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 06/12/2014 05:17 PM, David Kranz wrote: Tempest has a number of tests in various services for deleting objects that mostly return 204. Many, but not all, of these tests go on to check that the resource was actually deleted but do so in different ways.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Consolidated metrics proposal

Hey Andres, In my experience with usage gathering consolidating statistics at the root layer is usually a bad idea. The reason is that you lose potentially useful information once you consolidate data. When it comes to troubleshooting issues (such as billing) this lost information can cause pro

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Gate still backed up - need assistance with nova-network logging enhancements

On 6/12/2014 10:41 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Hey Matt, There is a connection pool in https://github.com/boto/boto/blob/develop/boto/connection.py which could be causing issues... -- dims On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 6/10/2014 5:36 AM, Michael Still wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Meaning of 204 from DELETE apis

On 06/12/2014 05:17 PM, David Kranz wrote: Tempest has a number of tests in various services for deleting objects that mostly return 204. Many, but not all, of these tests go on to check that the resource was actually deleted but do so in different ways. Sometimes they go into a timeout loop wait

Re: [openstack-dev] Message level security plans.

Hi Tim, Jamie Lennox (cc'd) has been the main developer working on Kite. I'm sure he would appreciate you getting involved in reviews [1] and any other development help you're willing to contribute. Patches have slowly been landing in the kite repo. [2] For others not familiar with Kite, there

[openstack-dev] [qa] Meaning of 204 from DELETE apis

Tempest has a number of tests in various services for deleting objects that mostly return 204. Many, but not all, of these tests go on to check that the resource was actually deleted but do so in different ways. Sometimes they go into a timeout loop waiting for a GET on the object to fail. Some

Re: [openstack-dev] Message level security plans.

On 6/12/2014 10:31 AM, Kelsey, Timothy Joh wrote: Thanks for the info Matt, I guess I should have been clearer about what I was asking. I was indeed referring to the trusted RPC messaging proposal you linked. Im keen to find out whats happening with that and where I can help. Looks like ther

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed locking

So just a few thoughts before going to far down this path, Can we make sure we really really understand the use-case where we think this is needed. I think it's fine that this use-case exists, but I just want to make it very clear to others why its needed and why distributing locking is the only *

[openstack-dev] [nova] is the cpu feature check in _compare_cpu() valid

In nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py the _compare_cpu() function checks the cpu features using self._conn.compareCPU(). Is this actually valid? The kvm processes don't seem to have the "--cpu" option specified, so we should get a compatible subset of cpu features from qemu. If that's the case then

Re: [openstack-dev] mysql/mysql-python license "contamination" into openstack?

On 06/12/2014 02:13 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: Hi, I'm looking for the community viewpoint on whether there is any chance of license contamination between mysql and nova. I realize that lawyers would need to be involved for a proper ruling, but I'm curious about the view of the developers on the

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On 06/12/2014 12:24 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Jun 12, 2014 8:37 AM, "Sean Dague" mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote: > > On 06/12/2014 10:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > > On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote: > >> > >>> That's not cacthable in uni

Re: [openstack-dev] NFV in OpenStack use cases and context

++ Yathi. -Original Message- From: ramki Krishnan [mailto:r...@brocade.com] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 12:48 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Alan Kavanagh Cc: Norival Figueira Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] NFV in OpenStack use cases and context Yath

Re: [openstack-dev] NFV in OpenStack use cases and context

Yathi - many thanks for adding more NFV context. Alan - many thanks for the interest and would be glad to have further discussions. Thanks, Ramki -Original Message- From: Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi) [mailto:yud...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 11:53 AM To: Alan Kavanagh Cc: Open

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] pacemaker management tools

It's been a while since I've used these tools and I'm not 100% surprised they've fragmented once again. :) That said, does pcs support creating the CIB configuration in bulk from a file? I know that crm shell would let you dump the entire cluster config and restore from file. Unless the CIB forma

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Third-Party][Infra] Optimize third party resources

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > On Jun 12, 2014 9:20 AM, "Jaume Devesa" wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I've just submitted a patch[1] to solve a bug in Neutron. All the > third-party plugins has voted as +1 but Jenkins has refused the patch > because of the '.' dot at

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][messaging] Further improvements and refactoring

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 15:47 +0400, Dina Belova wrote: >> Dims, >> >> >> No problem with creating the specs, we just want to understand if the >> community is OK with our suggestions in general :) >> If so, I'll create the appropriat

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] versioning and releases

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Mark McLoughlin wrote: >> On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 12:09 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> Doug Hellmann wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 12:24 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > [.

Re: [openstack-dev] mysql/mysql-python license "contamination" into openstack?

On Thu Jun 12 14:13:05 2014, Chris Friesen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for the community viewpoint on whether there is any chance > of license contamination between mysql and nova. I realize that > lawyers would need to be involved for a proper ruling, but I'm curious > about the view of the dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Third-Party][Infra] Optimize third party resources

On Jun 12, 2014 9:20 AM, "Jaume Devesa" wrote: > > Hello all, > > I've just submitted a patch[1] to solve a bug in Neutron. All the third-party plugins has voted as +1 but Jenkins has refused the patch because of the '.' dot at the end of the commit summary line. > > I know that is my fault, becau

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

> If someone can point me to a case where we've actually found this kind > of bug with tempest / devstack, that would be great. I've just *never* > seen it. I was the one that did most of the fixing for pg support in > Nova, and have helped other projects as well, so I'm relatively familiar > with

Re: [openstack-dev] Problematic gate-tempest-dsvm-virtual-ironic job

I've opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1329430 to track the progress of getting the ironic job in better shape. Monty had a great suggestion this morning about how cache_devstack.py can be updated to cache the UCA stuff for any job that may need it. I'm putting together a patch

Re: [openstack-dev] NFV in OpenStack use cases and context

Hi Alan, Our Smart (Solver) Scheduler blueprint (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/solver-scheduler ) has been in the works in the Nova community since late 2013. We have demoed at the Hong Kong summit, as well as the Atlanta summit, use cases using this smart scheduler for better, op

[openstack-dev] mysql/mysql-python license "contamination" into openstack?

Hi, I'm looking for the community viewpoint on whether there is any chance of license contamination between mysql and nova. I realize that lawyers would need to be involved for a proper ruling, but I'm curious about the view of the developers on the list. Suppose someone creates a modified

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On 06/12/2014 01:22 PM, Tim Bell wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] >> Sent: 12 June 2014 17:37 >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations >> in >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Problematic gate-tempest-dsvm-virtual-ironic job

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/12/2014 06:40 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > Current gate-tempest-dsvm-virtual-ironic has only a 65% pass rate > *in the gate* over the last 48 hrs - > http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJidWlsZF9uYW1lOmdhdGUtdGVtcGVzdC1kc3ZtLXZpcnR1YWwtaXJvb

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Reviews - we need your help!

On 12/06/14 16:02, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote: > FWIW, I’ve tried to make a useful dashboard for this using Sean Dague’s > gerrit-dash-creator [0]. > > > > Short URL is http://bit.ly/1l4DLFS long url is: > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=%28project%3Aopenstack%

Re: [openstack-dev] NFV in OpenStack use cases and context

Hi Ramki Really like the smart scheduler idea, we made a couple of blueprints that are related to ensuring you have the right information to build a constrained based scheduler. I do however want to point out that this is not NFV specific but is useful for all applications and services of which

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On 06/12/2014 09:36 AM, Sean Dague wrote: This is what I mean by functional testing. If we were directly hitting a real database on a set of in tree project tests, I think you could discover issues like this. Neutron was headed down that path. But if we're talking about a devstack / tempest run

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nominating Nikhil Komawar for Core

+1 Good job Nikhil! - Original Message - From: "Brian Rosmaita" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 10:15:07 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nominating Nikhil Komawar for Core +1 From: Kuvaja, Erno [kuv...@hp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Third-Party][Infra] Optimize third party resources

On 06/12/2014 01:07 PM, Jaume Devesa wrote: > ​Anita, thanks for the response. My comments inline:​ > > > >> Well then we are in a situation where development ceases until the third >> party systems respond. Which is not a situation we want to put ourselves >> in. We actually are actively avoidi

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Barbican 2014.2 ("Juno") M1 is released

Hello everyone, It is my pleasure to announce the first milestone release of Barbican for Juno 2014.2. Information on the milestone and its associated tarball are available at: https://launchpad.net/barbican/juno/juno-1 With this release, work has been started to support other order generation

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nominating Nikhil Komawar for Core

+1 From: Kuvaja, Erno [kuv...@hp.com] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 9:34 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Nominating Nikhil Komawar for Core +1 From: Alex Meade [mailto:mr.alex.me...@gmail.co

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

On 2014-06-12, 7:18 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 06/11/2014 08:12 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: On 2014-06-11, 7:52 PM, Sean Dague wrote: I'm concerned about the [nova] section being (one day) overloaded with options unrelated to the actual nova client configuration. Although my concern could be wrong.

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2014-06-12 08:15:46 -0700: > > On 6/12/2014 9:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > > On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote: > >> > >>> That's not cacthable in unit or functional tests? > >> Not in an accurate manner

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

> -Original Message- > From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] > Sent: 12 June 2014 17:37 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in > the gate > ... > But if we're talking about a dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [marconi] performance

Hello, I was wondering if there is any update on the performance of Marconi? Are results of any performance measurements available yet? Thanks, Tomasz Janczuk @tjanczuk HP On 4/29/14, 1:01 PM, "Janczuk, Tomasz" wrote: >Hi Flavio, > >Thanks! I also added some comments to the performance test pl

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Third-Party][Infra] Optimize third party resources

​Anita, thanks for the response. My comments inline:​ > Well then we are in a situation where development ceases until the third > party systems respond. Which is not a situation we want to put ourselves > in. We actually are actively avoiding that situation. > > ​I don't mean to run after the c

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:24:15AM -0700, Joe Gordon wrote: > On Jun 12, 2014 8:37 AM, "Sean Dague" wrote: > > > > On 06/12/2014 10:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > > > > On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > > >> On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote: > > >> > > >>> That's not cacthable in un

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][group-based-policy] GP mapping driver

Hi Carlos, I noticed that the point you raised here had not been followed up. So if I understand correctly, your concern is related to sharing common configuration information between GP drivers, and ML2 mechanism drivers (when used in the mapping)? If so, would a common configuration file shared

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][group-based-policy] GP mapping driver

Hi Carlos, I noticed that the point you raised here had not been followed up. So if I understand correctly, your concern is related to sharing common configuration information between GP drivers, and ML2 mechanism drivers (when used in the mapping)? If so, would a common configuration file shared

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

an update after today's l3 meeting: here's a new version of ryu bgp api patch. http://sourceforge.net/p/ryu/mailman/message/32453021/ YAMAMOTO Takashi > I have seen the Ryu team is involved and responsive to the community. > That goes a long way to support it as the reference implementation for >

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On 06/12/2014 08:36 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 06/12/2014 10:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: >> >> On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote: >>> That's not cacthable in unit or functional tests? >>> Not in an accurate manner, no. >>> Keeping jobs alive

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed locking

On 06/12/2014 10:35 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Matthew Booth wrote: We have a need for a distributed lock in the VMware driver, which I suspect isn't unique. Specifically it is possible for a VMware datastore to be accessed via multiple nova nodes if it is shared between clus

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Third-Party][Infra] Optimize third party resources

On 06/12/2014 12:20 PM, Jaume Devesa wrote: > Hello all, > > I've just submitted a patch[1] to solve a bug in Neutron. All the > third-party plugins has voted as +1 but Jenkins has refused the patch > because of the '.' dot at the end of the commit summary line. > > I know that is my fault, becau

Re: [openstack-dev] masking X-Auth-Token in debug output - proposed consistency

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Sean Dague  wrote: The only thing it makes harder is you have to generate your own token to run the curl command. The rest is there. Well I would have imagine that the curl command debug are here so people can easily copy and paste them and/or tweak them, but su

Re: [openstack-dev] [marconi] Reconsidering the unified API model

What exactly is the core set of functionalities Marconi expects all implementations to support? (I understand it is a subset of the HTTP APIs Marconi exposes?) On 6/12/14, 4:56 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: >On 11/06/14 16:26 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote: >>On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:23 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate proposal - drop Postgresql configurations in the gate

On Jun 12, 2014 8:37 AM, "Sean Dague" wrote: > > On 06/12/2014 10:38 AM, Mike Bayer wrote: > > > > On 6/12/14, 8:26 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Sean Dague wrote: > >> > >>> That's not cacthable in unit or functional tests? > >> Not in an accurate manner, no. > >> > >>> Keepi

[openstack-dev] [marconi] Juno-1 development milestone available

Hi folks, Marconi’s first Juno milestone release is now available. It includes several bug fixes, plus adds support for caching frequent DB queries as part of the team's focus on performance tuning during the Juno cycle. This release also includes an important refactoring of our API tests that wil

  1   2   >