? 2014?06?11? 05:09, Jiang, Yunhong ??:
Hi, Robert
For your first question, I suspect it's something wrong and
should be 'devi_id', which is the hypervisor's identification for the
device. I will leave Yongli to have more comments on it.
sorry for later, this name is libvirt returned device name, use to
oprate the device via libvirt later. device_id might a good name for this.
Yongli He
For the second one, thanks for point the issue out. Yes, I'm
working on fixing it.
--jyh
*From:*Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:ba...@cisco.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:46 PM
*To:* Jiang, Yunhong; He, Yongli
*Cc:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* [openstack-dev][nova][pci] A couple of questions
Hi Yunhong & Yongli,
In the routine _prepare_pci_devices_for_use(), it's referring to
dev['hypervisor_name']. I didn't see code that's setting it up, or the
libvirt nodedev xml includes hypervisor_name. Is this specific to Xen?
Another question is about the issue that was raised in this review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82206/. It's about the use of node id
or host name in the PCI device table. I'd like to know you guys'
thoughts on that.
thanks,
Robert
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev