? 2014?06?11? 05:09, Jiang, Yunhong ??:

Hi, Robert

For your first question, I suspect it's something wrong and should be 'devi_id', which is the hypervisor's identification for the device. I will leave Yongli to have more comments on it.

sorry for later, this name is libvirt returned device name, use to oprate the device via libvirt later. device_id might a good name for this.

Yongli He

For the second one, thanks for point the issue out. Yes, I'm working on fixing it.

--jyh

*From:*Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:ba...@cisco.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 10, 2014 1:46 PM
*To:* Jiang, Yunhong; He, Yongli
*Cc:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* [openstack-dev][nova][pci] A couple of questions

Hi Yunhong & Yongli,

In the routine _prepare_pci_devices_for_use(), it's referring to dev['hypervisor_name']. I didn't see code that's setting it up, or the libvirt nodedev xml includes hypervisor_name. Is this specific to Xen?

Another question is about the issue that was raised in this review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82206/. It's about the use of node id or host name in the PCI device table. I'd like to know you guys' thoughts on that.

thanks,

Robert


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to