On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Michael Still <mi...@stillhq.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: >> We're definitely deep into capacity issues, so it's going to be time to >> start making tougher decisions about things we decide aren't different >> enough to bother testing on every commit. > > I think one of the criticisms that could be made about OpenStack at > the moment is that we're not opinionated enough. We have a lot of bugs > because we support huge numbers of drivers of varying quality and > completeness. Do you think its time for the gate to be an opinionated > set of tests of how OpenStack can be deployed? Perhaps we should gate > on only one permutation of a possible OpenStack cloud, and then let > people who want to propose deviations from that permutation run their > own CI as third parties. > This is honestly the approach that we've taken with Neutron. We are currently only testing the ML2 plugin with the Open vSwitch agent. We don't (to my knowledge) even test the Linuxbridge agent or L2 population driver in ML2 in the gate, nor the other Open Source drivers and plugins. We rely on 3rd party CI for all of those. It's not unreasonable for a similar model to be followed for other pieces of testing.
Kyle > I'm not particularly advocating this stance, but it is an option and > I'd like to see it explored a bit more. > > Michael > > -- > Rackspace Australia > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
