Like Krishna asked, have you added a security group rule for TCP port 5001?
Otherwise ingress traffic on that port will be dropped.
-Brian
On 03/04/2015 05:45 AM, Priyanka Naik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry my mistake . I was actually trying it for different ports and copied the
> earlier command on cl
5 10:25 AM, ppnaik wrote:
> Sir,
> I added rule tcp 1 65535 but it still did not work.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Priyanka
>
>
> On 2015-03-04 20:29, Brian Haley wrote:
>> Like Krishna asked, have you added a security group rule for TCP port 5001?
>> Other
not respond. If you run it in the foreground it will print a
message when it receives a connection request.
-Brian
> On 2015-03-04 21:23, abhishek jain wrote:
>> Have you checked ping connectivity between the VMs?
>> On Mar 4, 2015 9:19 PM, "Brian Haley" wrote:
>>
On 05/05/2015 09:47 AM, Wilson Kwok wrote:
Hello,
Here is my home lap network settings:
Home computer 172.28.0.130
Ubuntu eth0 (no IP address)
eth1 172.28.0.105 (for managmeent)
br100 10.0.47.1 map to eth0
instance01 10.0.47.2
This is your floating IP, right?
My question is home
On 5/19/15 8:40 AM, Tom Walsh wrote:
This is a new relatively new issue that has started occurring on our
OpenStack setup since we upgraded Juno (RDO based) to 2.2-1 (we had been
running Juno 2.0 before without issue). Our setup is:
Since it started happening on an RDO upgrade my first suggesti
On 09/02/2015 02:13 PM, Matt Dupre (projectcalico.org) wrote:
Hi all,
We've been seeing a problem where we can boot instances when there's one
Neutron network configured, but not if a second is configured (even
though the instance isn't using that network!).
Did you specify both networks at bo
On 09/08/2015 12:01 PM, Yngvi Páll Þorfinnsson wrote:
HI
I can‘t delete a subnet (id f505a109-07a7-420a-ae6b-aa5995126be7 ), because one
port is still in use.
root@opst-ctrl1-dev:/# neutron subnet-delete
f505a109-07a7-420a-ae6b-aa5995126be7
Unable to complete operation on subnet f505a109-07a7
etwork_id| 523721c5-ea5d-42a1-8920-8bc75010f273 |
| tenant_id | 1dda2478e30d44dda0ca752c6047725d |
+---++
root@opst-ctrl1-dev:/#
best regards
Yngvi
-Original Message-
From: Brian Haley [mail
On 01/09/2014 12:41 PM, Rafael Gomes wrote:
> Hi everyone, Sorry for bother you again. But now I have a question about
> metadata service when I launch a VM.
>
> The openstack instalation use a neutron to network and metadata service. I can
> launch a VM (image cirros), ping and access via ssh to
Putting the ML back on the thread...
On 01/12/2014 07:20 AM, Rafael Gomes wrote:
> Hum ok. I understand.
>
> So it's normally that when I run a curl 169.254.169.254 or
> 169.254.169.254:8775
> from my VM I won't obtain answer? I ask this because right now when I execute
> the curl I don't have
On 01/28/2014 04:22 PM, Howard Luckenbaugh wrote:
> I am having a issue with getting a second IP sitting on top of a VM eth0 to
> work. Do I have to allocate this IP in SCO first before this will work. It is
> in
> the same network as the VM IP which is working fine.
There's anti-spoofing rules a
ova boot [...] --nic port-id=$PORT_ID1 vm
-Brian
> From: Brian Haley
> To: Howard Luckenbaugh/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, openstack@lists.openstack.org,
> Date: 01/28/2014 07:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Network issue with a service entry sitting on top of
On 06/13/2014 04:13 AM, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I installed a one node Icehouse cloud at home, with Neutron and GRE.
> Everything is ok, except I can't ssh to ubuntu instances.
> The problem is that cloud-init is unable to reach the metadata service, thus
> the
> keypair is ne
On 7/21/14, 3:54 AM, BYEONG-GI KIM wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm now trying to deploy two nodes environment (Flat Network or VLAN
> Network) for OpenStack instead of 3 nodes which are generally considered
> as default and recommended deployment for the OpenStack. The major
> reason why I'm going to depl
When you don't specify it, the default network type is:
(from lib/neutron_plugins/ml2)
Q_ML2_TENANT_NETWORK_TYPE=${Q_ML2_TENANT_NETWORK_TYPE:-"vxlan"}
You can try specifying that as "vlan" in your local.conf file and see what
happens.
-Brian
BTW, this probably should have just gone to openstac
On 10/07/2014 11:25 AM, Danny Choi (dannchoi) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I create a Neutron router, a corresponding qrouter namespace is
> automatically created.
>
> After I delete the router, the qrouter namespace remains. I have to manually
> delete it.
>
> Is this expected behavior?
Do you have
On 11/19/2014 05:45 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a small multi host devstack setup running from from 2 Ubuntu 14.04
> hosts
> (themselves VMs):
> - controller node (stack1) running everything except compute
> - compute node (stack2) running compute only
>
> If I amend the default se
On 11/19/2014 03:31 AM, Chinasubbareddy M wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know where the iptables at compute side will get saved, I
> mean
> they will get saved in any configuration file or not.
Neutron doesn't save iptables info in any file, it builds a chain/rule set
internally, then app
On 11/18/2015 07:33 AM, kevin parrikar wrote:
i am trying Juno *without *DVR and there are around 500 sub nets in each network
node.
Network nodes have 500+ dnsmasq process which are configured to give ipv6,ipv4
addresses out of this some fluctuates between D and S state while others are in
cont
Hi Daniel,
On 12/09/2015 05:57 AM, daniel.balsi...@swisscom.com wrote:
Hello everybody.
I am not sure if it is the right place to ask this question, please direct me to
the right list in case it is not.
I am running OpenStack Kilo on top of Ubuntu 14.04 with neutron DVR (openvswitch
agents, l
s security
group rule allowing SCTP get hit.
-Brian
____
From: Brian Haley
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 3:42 PM
To: Balsiger Daniel, INI-INO-ECO-MXT; openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Openstack Kilo, problems with SCTP and neutron
On 02/04/2016 07:05 AM, Kamen Tarlov wrote:
Hello,
We have a single node installation with RDO Kilo release. Network configuration
consist of 2 private networks and one of them is floating. Networks are routed
just inside the node. The problem I`m facing is when I try to configure the
DNAT rule
and now those rules are in the namespace.
Therefore I would suggest to try and let all the services do their job and
see it that works
Inviato da iPhone
> Il giorno 04 feb 2016, alle ore 06:56, Brian Haley mailto:brian.ha...@hpe.com>> ha scritto:
>
>>
On 3/3/16 4:48 AM, Vincent Godin wrote:
If you install Openstack using ipv4 but without disabling ipv6 (like
almost all distrib) a VM in any tenant is able to connect to every
daemon listening in ipv6 on the compute (ssh, libvirt and ...). This is
du to the interfaces in the linux bridge attach
Godin wrote:
I saw this behaviour on Icehouse and on Kilo releases
Vincent
2016-03-03 14:45 GMT+01:00 Brian Haley mailto:brian.ha...@hpe.com>>:
On 3/3/16 4:48 AM, Vincent Godin wrote:
If you install Openstack using ipv4 but without disabling ipv6 (like
almost all distrib)
On 4/26/16 12:05 PM, Jaison Peter wrote:
Hi George,
Thanks for letting me know that we can create distributed router by
disabling SNAT in central router.
Even though we use VRRP HA router, it will consume 100 public IPs in the
scenario I mentioned above, but can save IPs used in compute fip nam
On 06/14/2016 09:34 AM, Daniel Ruiz Molina wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting an important problem after deleting an instance. I'm running
Openstack Juno in a server that acts as controller and network node (with 3
nics). Computes have 2 nics. Because of computes are in an student laboratory,
each comput
On 06/15/2016 12:18 AM, Priyanka wrote:
Hi,
I want to create a basic round-robin layer 3 load balancer. The request would be
coming from same tenant network and the backend servers would also be in the
same network. For this the steps I think should be done are: create a neutron
port (for the lo
On 06/22/2016 03:42 AM, Priyanka wrote:
Hi,
We have a Openstack Juno setup with 1 controller+neutron node and 3 compute
nodes. 1 VM (LB) has ipvsadm installed and two VMs act as back end server.
On the server with ipvsadm I have eth0:0 IP as 192.168.1.21 which acts as
application IP. The ipvsad
dnesday 22 June 2016 08:16 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
On 06/22/2016 03:42 AM, Priyanka wrote:
Hi,
We have a Openstack Juno setup with 1 controller+neutron node and 3 compute
nodes. 1 VM (LB) has ipvsadm installed and two VMs act as back end server.
On the server with ipvsadm I have eth0:0 IP as 192
On 07/01/2016 05:49 AM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
On Jun 30, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
Stracing the running process, I noticed this:
connect(8, {sa_family=AF_LOCAL, sun_path="/var/lib/neutron/metadata_proxy"},
33) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
Creating the socket man
On 07/14/2016 07:12 AM, Vladislav Belogrudov wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to run dvr_snat on computes only (in ha mode as well)? Docs [1]
tell that dvr_snat+l3_ha agents should be on controllers / network nodes while
dvr agents on computes. Does dvr part of dvr_snat only work in active/passive i
On 08/17/2016 05:08 AM, Ludwig Tirazona wrote:
Hello,
Has anybody had this experience/problem as well?
I'm not sure I'd expect this to work, here is just one reason.
The VM really doesn't know when to use which router, because it doesn't know
which target IP was used pre-NAT. For example,
On 08/17/2016 01:54 PM, Piotr Baranowski wrote:
- Oryginalna wiadomość -
Od: "Brian Haley"
Do: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Wysłane: środa, 17 sierpnia, 2016 18:53:47
Temat: Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] Second Public IP for VM on Another Public
Network does not work properl
On 08/17/2016 07:40 PM, Neil Jerram wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:35 PM Brian Haley mailto:brian.ha...@hpe.com>> wrote:
Is a cloud datacenter going to have multiple link types? I doubt it. And
having two VMs would be easier anyways as there are probably other things
yo
On 08/21/2016 08:40 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 05:28:44PM +0530, Akilesh K wrote:
Hi,
I am using devstack for the first time and I see that it has created a
subnet like below. The cidr and gateway do not match. Because of this
devstack fails to run completely and fails while
22/2016 01:57 PM, Brent Troge wrote:
Doesn't neutron use the first available host address in the subnet as the
gateway? So if your cidr is 128/25 then neutron would default to 129 as the
gateway.
On Aug 22, 2016 9:54 AM, "Brian Haley" mailto:brian.ha...@hpe.com>> wrote:
On 08/2
On 08/22/2016 04:30 PM, Brent Troge wrote:
Thanks Brian for your reply and your contributions.
No problem.
Devstack patch is at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358848/
-Brian
On Aug 22, 2016 2:09 PM, "Brian Haley" mailto:brian.ha...@hpe.com>> wrote:
Yes, it uses th
On 08/30/2016 09:54 AM, Jorge Luiz Correa wrote:
Hi! I need some help to understand and configure my network node to provide
network access using a dual stack configuration. I've a scenario with one
controller, one network node and a lot of compute nodes. The version is Mitaka
on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
On 08/30/2016 02:53 PM, Jorge Luiz Correa wrote:
Thank you Tomas and Brian!
Here they are (just replace my ipv6 prefix with 2001:DB8). But, I think the
problem is with firewall rules (see bellow).
root@dataexp-network:/# ip netns exec
qrouter-eb42f197-8969-4744-b226-49653ed2bf48 ip -6 route
On 08/30/2016 03:08 PM, Satish Patel wrote:
Interesting, when i create V-Router then it suppose to appear on
Compute node right but it doesn't. What could be wrong, Does mikata
support DVR or it's something i am doing wrong
[root@controller ~(keystone_admin)]# ip netns
snat-99960b5a-b475-436a-a2
On 08/31/2016 07:00 AM, Jorge Luiz Correa wrote:
*Chain neutron-l3-agent-scope (1 references)*
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
78 4368 *DROP* all * qr-1ee33f03-23 ::/0
::/0 mark match !
On 12/13/2016 02:45 PM, Gustavo Randich wrote:
Hi Openstackers,
We have the folowing issue (using Mitaka / DVR / Xenial), perhaps someone can
help ;)
When our hosts boots up, the ARP cache population loop of L3 Agent is delaying
the start of neutron-ns-metadata-proxy for around a minute -- see
On 12/31/2016 03:58 AM, Davide Panarese wrote:
Sorry Gary,
i don’t use this driver and however i can’t find in the code.
The upstream neutron code does not add these rules, so they are either in a
driver or vendor-specific distro code.
-Brian
On 30 Dec 2016, at 20:00, Gary Kotton wrote:
On 01/04/2017 03:22 AM, zhaolihuisky wrote:
hi, all
I have a problem about that vm can not get ip address by dnsmasq server.
I have got the DHCP packets by tcpdump.
With the DHCP protocol, client send DHCP Discover, and then server reply DHCP
Offer, next client send DHCP Request and server reply
On 02/13/2017 12:26 PM, kevin parrikar wrote:
hello All,
I just installed Mitaka release with DVR and ml2+OVS,everything looks fine .
vms are getting ip address,floating IP address is working,vms can talk to lbaas
namespace
How ever:
Communication from qrouter-namespace to lbass and dhcp names
On 03/28/2017 08:39 PM, Oisin O'Malley wrote:
There was 2 separate issues to resolve;
Firstly Nova was appending the default domain name .novalocal to the hostname
it presents via the meta-data service. This can be resolved by setting
dhcp_domain to an empty string in nova.conf on the Control
On 04/07/2017 07:19 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
You may be missing whatever package in your distro provides the
'conntrack' util.
Like Kevin said, it's probably missing conntrack. There is an upstream
patch that you might be able to apply to show a better message,
https://review.openstack.org/#/
On 04/10/2017 04:15 PM, Georgios Dimitrakakis wrote:
Installing the "conntrack-tools" package from the
"centos-openstack-ocata" repository seems to have fixed the problem.
My question is if this should have happened automatically during
installation and if yes why it didn't happen?
From your c
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Brian Haley [mailto:haleyb@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 April 2017 6:24 AM
To: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] LinuxBridge Agent Error
On 04/10/2017 04:15 PM, Georgios Dimitrakakis wrote:
Installing the "conntrack-to
On 06/19/2017 08:51 AM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Hi, all. We've got two Canonical Newton installs using VLANs and we're
having intermittent issues we simply can't figure out. (Note that a
third installation using flat networks is not having this issue.)
Floating IPs set up and work... sporadical
On 07/23/2017 10:11 AM, Satish Patel wrote:
Is DVR good to go for production? I heard it's complex to troubleshoot
and other downtime you need public IP on every compute node for internet
gateway. What if you have 100 compute node ?
DVR has been in Neutron for a number of releases and is prett
On 07/28/2017 05:54 AM, Amit Kumar wrote:
Hi,
Recently i have installed the openstack newton on Ubuntu 16.04. Brought
up one controller and 2 compute nodes. All services are up and running
unable to reach the vm from outside
I have logged in to the qrouter tried pinging the internal network
On 09/16/2017 12:25 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
When I setup my OS cluster over a year ago, I chose to use
distributed LBaaSv2. That sounded like the most sensible
thing - redundancy is the primary goal with me choosing
OS in the first place!
However, it turned out that there’s a very grave bug
On 09/19/2017 03:49 AM, Jean-Philippe Méthot wrote:
We fixed our floating ip problem, or at least we believe we did so. We
cleaned out the neutron lock files and since then, no floating ip issues.
However, we’re still getting the iptables error messages on l3-agent boot.
You will probable wan
On 09/18/2017 04:19 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
On 18 Sep 2017, at 14:50, Brian Haley wrote:
Sorry, due to the invasiveness of the changes it won't be backported to Newton
Bugger! That’s a shame :(. No way I can convince someone to do it,
for a (small) monetary donation?
I can
BTW, the networking guide does mention this, found after Steve figure
out what the problem was.
https://docs.openstack.org/ocata/networking-guide/config-ipv6.html#configuring-interfaces-of-the-guest
-Brian
On 09/28/2017 08:49 PM, Jorge Luiz Correa wrote:
Thanks for explain Jeremy! Very clear.
On 11/15/2017 12:58 PM, Sterdnot Shaken wrote:
Openstack version: Pike
Openvswitch version: 2.7
Let's say I have a OS project that has 2 routers. The routers are HA and
reside on 2 network nodes. Via VRRP, there are 2 Active and 2 Passive
routers. As you may know, Neutron creates a custom HA n
On 11/27/2017 10:24 AM, Ramu, MohanX wrote:
Hi All,
Not bale to launch an instance on Compute Node. instead of it, instance
is trying to launch on the same controller.
The added compute node is not there in resource provider table.
Could you please help us what we missed.
Is placement API n
On 01/15/2018 01:57 PM, Satish Patel wrote:
I am planning to build openstack on production and big question is
network (legacy vs DVR) but in DVR big concern is number of Public IP
used on every compute node, I am planning to add max 100 node in
cluster in that case it will use 100 public IP for
within the datacenter. If you create it and set the
service-type to only certain types of ports, like DVR, then it won't be
used for floating IP as the other one is.
-Brian
On Jan 15, 2018, at 9:47 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
On 01/15/2018 01:57 PM, Satish Patel wrote:
I am planning to
that network, that way the DVR routers would use IPs from it, and
still be able to communicate with other devices in the datacenter. I
believe the docs site I linked previously had an example of this.
-Brian
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:12 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
On 01/16/2018 08:37 AM, Satish
On 03/21/2018 04:52 PM, Mārtiņš Jakubovičs wrote:
Dear all,
I faced issue when migrating instance by live-migration +
block-migration guests floating IP became inaccessible. My setup are OVS
+ DVR. Currently upgrading from Newton to Ocata.
Looks like when migration starts, in destination hos
On 03/20/2018 12:40 PM, Ramon Orru wrote:
Hello everybody, I'm running a fresh queens cluster. I'm using bridges
to support networking. I'm facing an issue when an instance is live
migrated.
Suppose we have an instance running with an interface on vlan XXX, and
we want to migrate it to compute
e someone
more familiar with the Nova side of the migration would know?
-Brian
Il 21/03/18 22:35, Brian Haley ha scritto:
On 03/20/2018 12:40 PM, Ramon Orru wrote:
Hello everybody, I'm running a fresh queens cluster. I'm using
bridges to support networking. I'm facing an i
st in
case there was a bug somewhere that is now fixed.
Thanks,
-Brian
On 2018.03.21. 23:37, Brian Haley wrote:
On 03/21/2018 04:52 PM, Mārtiņš Jakubovičs wrote:
Dear all,
I faced issue when migrating instance by live-migration +
block-migration guests floating IP became inaccessible. My setu
On 04/06/2018 01:28 PM, s serge wrote:
Hello,
I'm evaluating an installation and everything from networking side was looking
good
until I tried to reach a VM host via private network from another VM via ssh.
In short:
1. Spawn a VM
2. Associate a floating IP
3. Logon to VM via ssh on public ne
On 06/18/2018 06:26 AM, David Fernandes wrote:
Hi guys,
I have just 1 question. Is it possible to use OVS inside an Openstack VM
? Let me explain my issue.
I have created 2 Ubuntu 16.04 VMs and installed last version of OVS in
both. Both VMs are connected to the same network and they can pin
On 07/12/2018 08:20 AM, Torin Woltjer wrote:
The neutron-metadata-agent service is running, the the agent is alive,
and it is listening on port 8775. However, new instances still do not
get any information like hostname or keypair. If I run `curl
192.168.116.22:8775` from the compute nodes, I d
On 07/16/2018 08:41 AM, Torin Woltjer wrote:
$ip netns exec qdhcp-87a5200d-057f-475d-953d-17e873a47454 curl
http://169.254.169.254
404 Not Found
404 Not Found
The resource could not be found. >
Strange, don't know where the reply came from for that.
$ip netns exec qrouter-80c3bc40
On 08/23/2018 12:53 PM, Jorge Luiz Correa wrote:
Hi all
I'm deploying a Queens on Ubuntu 18.04 with one controller, one network
controller e for now one compute node. I'm using ML2 with linuxbridge
mechanism driver and a self-service type of network. This is is a dual
stack environment (v4 an
On 10/25/2018 08:06 AM, Alexandru Sorodoc wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to set up metering for neutron in Pike. I tested it with a
centralized router and it works, but when I try with a distributed router it
doesn't record any usage samples. I have one compute node and one
network node
and I've cre
72 matches
Mail list logo