Joshua,
I'll leave it up to the event staff to determine how they want to handle it
in this on-site case. Certainly someone needs to be empowered or the
exercise is pointless. For the community as a whole, does the Board of
Directors have the authority to create an ombuds office?
-DM
On Sun, Se
David, while I think having an onsite group able to field complaints and
address incidents is critical, we need to make sure that such a group has the
ability to address any complaints. So I'd suggest we pass this directly to the
foundation staff, and make sure that the event coordination team i
Hi All,
I am still in the learning process. Any inputs here, I am trying to
understand them. So I would have loved to help, but right now, I am also
not attending the summit this time. I would like to be involved in
understanding how our thought process is going to evolve in this process.
Regards
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:26 PM, David Mortman wrote:
> Agreed. There should be at least a small group, especially for events, so
> that one person doesn't get hammered but also so there's a committee to
> make judgement calls etc. Love the idea of some training too.
>
Given the closeness of the
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:28 PM, John Griffith
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:26 PM, David Mortman wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Anne Gentle wrote
>>
>>> I think more than one ombudsperson may be needed to assure coverage and
>>> avoid anyone being reluctant to report, bu
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:26 PM, David Mortman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Anne Gentle wrote
>
>> I think more than one ombudsperson may be needed to assure coverage and
>> avoid anyone being reluctant to report, but I'm not familiar with how
>> ombuds work in general. I do know tha
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Anne Gentle wrote
> I think more than one ombudsperson may be needed to assure coverage and
> avoid anyone being reluctant to report, but I'm not familiar with how
> ombuds work in general. I do know that I wouldn't ever report something to
> a nameless phone numb
of the OpenStack summit to respect the code of
>> conduct, even if they are not members of the foundation.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> An ombuds would be very useful.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
&
;
> ** **
>
> Tim
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* David Mortman [mailto:launch...@mortman.com]
> *Sent:* 11 September 2013 19:41
> *To:* Anne Gentle
> *Cc:* openstack@lists.openstack.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack] Fwd: Making the Hong Kong Summit a
September 2013 19:41
To: Anne Gentle
Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Fwd: Making the Hong Kong Summit as inclusive as
possible
I like the idea of framing it as a code of conduct which definitely has a more
positive spin than anti-harassment policy and the
general one
I like the idea of framing it as a code of conduct which definitely has a
more positive spin than anti-harassment policy and the general one you
linked to is a great start. I'd love to see something added about
consequences of violating the code as well.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Anne Gent
Daniel,
Love the click through idea
-DM
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:53:36PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > David Mortman wrote:
> > > Given the recent and ongoing issues with sexism (not to mention racism,
> > > homophobia and gene
Agreed 100%
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Lauren Sell wrote:
> I also like the PyCon code of conduct and would be interested in adopting
> something very similar for our events.
>
> https://us.pycon.org/2012/codeofconduct/
>
> On Sep 11, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
> I would gre
Joshua,
Thanks. I'll take a look and post some comments to this thread over the
next couple of days.
-DM
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Joshua McKenty wrote:
> The manner of "who" and "how" to report any concerns is something that the
> foundation board, through the transparency committee,
I agree that for this conference doing it as an email blast and making the text
more prominent on the web site are the way to go.
I also think for future conferences, when including it in registration, the
PyCon "short version" should be on the form rather than click-through reading.
I don't kn
ge.
-Alex
-Original Message-
From: "Thierry Carrez"
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 11:11am
To: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Fwd: Making the Hong Kong Summit as inclusive as
possible
Eric Windisch wrote:
> Are Bill & Ted really our patrons
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Eric Windisch wrote:
> > Are Bill & Ted really our patrons of anti-harassment? We need something
> > more substantial than a Bill & Ted quote. Party on!
>
> I'm not saying what we have is sufficient. I'm just accurately
> describing the cur
The manner of "who" and "how" to report any concerns is something that the
foundation board, through the transparency committee, has been trying to
address. We don't have a formal ombudsman's office yet, but the draft
transparency policy[1] includes some language around this specific
responsibi
I also like the PyCon code of conduct and would be interested in adopting
something very similar for our events.
https://us.pycon.org/2012/codeofconduct/
On Sep 11, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> I would greatly support a reporting process for issues for our Summits.
> Thanks David fo
Eric Windisch wrote:
> Are Bill & Ted really our patrons of anti-harassment? We need something
> more substantial than a Bill & Ted quote. Party on!
I'm not saying what we have is sufficient. I'm just accurately
describing the current state.
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
_
Are Bill & Ted really our patrons of anti-harassment? We need something
more substantial than a Bill & Ted quote. Party on!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_yJFLvmjJY&feature=youtube_gdata_player
On Sep 11, 2013 10:12 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote:
> David Mortman wrote:
> > Given the recent and o
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:53:36PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> David Mortman wrote:
> > Given the recent and ongoing issues with sexism (not to mention racism,
> > homophobia and general bigotry) at tech conferences, I recently engaged
> > with several folks on twitter about what was being done
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> David Mortman wrote:
> > Given the recent and ongoing issues with sexism (not to mention racism,
> > homophobia and general bigotry) at tech conferences, I recently engaged
> > with several folks on twitter about what was being done to make
David Mortman wrote:
> Given the recent and ongoing issues with sexism (not to mention racism,
> homophobia and general bigotry) at tech conferences, I recently engaged
> with several folks on twitter about what was being done to make sure
> that the Hong Kong Summit was as inclusive as possible re
I would greatly support a reporting process for issues for our Summits.
Thanks David for bringing it to the mailing list. I can help in any way
needed.
One bit of input, I'm not sure wording as strong as "anti-harrassment
policy" is required, though that's at the heart of it. We can probably
follo
I think the official anti harassment policy is necessary as part of every
conference. I would like to contribute towards framing policies.
Thanks to David for raising this issue.
I plan to use the draft for the local Pyladies Bangalore chapter that am
currently running.
Warm regards,
Annapoornim
Given the recent and ongoing issues with sexism (not to mention racism,
homophobia and general bigotry) at tech conferences, I recently engaged
with several folks on twitter about what was being done to make sure that
the Hong Kong Summit was as inclusive as possible regardless of an
attendee's age
27 matches
Mail list logo
