Problem of course is many operators aren't on the design summit
contributor list ( ala don't have codes to get into it ) and if it's
later it's 500 USD to attend.
Maybe not the best means of collaborating on something that effects them deeply.
Pondering that.
-Matt
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:43
http://wiki.openstack.org/FolsomSummitEtherpads
All the etherpads
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Stefano Maffulli
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 23:13 -0400, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
>>> The following channels have been created on
I'm willing to help with setting up a 2.0 solution. =D Let us know
what we can do to help for next time.
I think this webex stuff has been useful for more than a few folks
from what i've seen on IRC.
-Matt
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I caught up wit
t would be kind of a cool project to
deploy a scalable streaming system for a conference like this and plug
it into an openstack scalable infrastructure.
-Matt
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>> I'
Reminds me of the Opsware Global Shell. That was built on a FUSE fs
interface to the API. I loved it when I worked on it.
-Matt
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> We had a good discussion about a unified OpenStack command line client
> on Monday at the Design Summit. The n
I'd be down with helping out as well.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
>>
>> We had a good discussion about a unified OpenStack command line client
>> on Monday at the Design Summit. The notes are in the Etherpad at
I've done libvirt calls via nrpe in the past for this.
On Apr 20, 2012 5:28 AM, "Leander Bessa" wrote:
> I've been trying to complete the diagnostics command for libvirt, so far i
> think i can get the cpu usage (still need a sample time of 1 second),
> volume and network io. I still can't get t
Correct me if I am wrong but mongo has not been used in openstack
previously? What is the benefit here that justifies bringing in new
technology?
Also are you planning an active polling process over AMPQ or passive
listening for the monitor?
It seems to me that most of the main components today
Monitoring and billing seem to be two VERY different beasts.
Should we be separating the two efforts?
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Brian Schott
wrote:
> The heart of nova-biling is built around accounts, resources, billing
> segments with a tariff and cost. Not clear at my first review wher
>From a security stand point I am curious what you see the benefit as?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Michael Grosser
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm following the openstack development for some time now and I was
> wondering if there was a solution to spin up encrypted virtual machines by
> default and
at 9:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 09:05:41AM -0700, Matt Joyce wrote:
>> From a security stand point I am curious what you see the benefit as?
>
> Consider that you might have separate people in your data center
> managing the virtualization hosts,
e are still exploits (hardware RAM taps?), and we rely on a
> total code audit, but we can raise the bar a long way.
>
> Anyone from Intel / familiar with Intel's trusted cloud work want to explain
> better than I can?
>
> Justin
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at
Makes sense to me.
On Apr 27, 2012 2:27 PM, "Everett Toews" wrote:
> I like this idea but what happens to the openstack-operators list in this
> scenario?
>
> I don't think we'd want to have the openstack and openstack-operators list
> going along in parallel since it sounds like they would overl
>
> 2. I think it would be good if the HIG gave guidelines on how the
> command should behave when run with no arguments.
I think the marines call this sort of thing, Task Condition and
Standard. Not sure how useful it would be.
> 3. I think it would be good if the HIG recommended that, at
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Doug Hellmann (doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com) wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Doug Hellmann
>> > wrote:
>> > > Do we need to specify this beyond saying that all subcommands mus
How does this blueprint play into this client. Is it a separate admin
only client or just a subset of this guy?
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/admin-cli
-matt
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> As of my rece
> As far as whether we support admin-only commands, I think we should.
> If they have their own client libs then we'll split them up too. I
> actually kind of liked the side effect of the old nova-manage in that
> it was self-enforcing for admin-ness since you needed to run it on the
> node itself
Awesome. will do.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
> I have started creating blueprints from my notes about activities we need to
> complete for the unified CLI. Please check the list
> at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/ and make sure I
> haven't misse
Question do we want to consider an interactive mode on the CLI? Or is
the shell enough for our use case?
Maybe just ignore that question until we've got something beyond the basics.
-Matt
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> Awesome. will do.
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2
" or whatever).
>
> 3. Separate admin apps for each project.
>
> I think we should avoid 3, since that goes against the spirit of this
> project. I like #2, but #1 would be easy to implement and could share 99% of
> the code from the basic openstackclient.
>
> On Tue, Ma
wrote:
> I borrowed Guido's time machine and added an interactive mode to cliff this
> weekend.
>
> http://cliff.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html
>
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>>
>> Question do we want to consider an interactiv
;> different plugin namespace, and therefore only loads the admin commands.
>>
>> 2. Prefix admin-related commands in the unified cli with "admin" (so
>> "openstack admin create network" or whatever).
>>
>> 3. Separate admin apps for each project.
>
gt;>>
>>> There are a couple of ways to handle that:
>>>
>>> 1. A separate "openstackadmin" CLI that looks for commands using a
>>> different plugin namespace, and therefore only loads the admin commands.
>>>
>>> 2. Prefix admin-r
Whatever. stack.sh is a conflict. So probably better.
On May 2, 2012 11:20 AM, "Doug Hellmann"
wrote:
> Oops, I saw the code change before this message and I went ahead and
> approved it.
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
>
>> There has been a little more activity in the
Good to have options.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>> I disagree pretty strongly with the idea of an admin binary.
>
> I think many of us do; I (and I believe Doug) were simply preferring
> 1) a si
I skipped out on blue printing and just submitted a gerrit review for
adding argparse flags for specifying URL for specific APIs.
Is that cool or do we want blue prints at that level of low complexity?
-Matt
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:18 AM,
>> I skipped out on blue printing and just submitted a gerrit review for
>> adding argparse flags for specifying URL for specific APIs.
>
> Why is this needed? These URLs come from the service catalog. Cases
> where you do need to override that use --os-url as part of token flow
> auth, skipping
How are we doing event handling in the client? Is there a blueprint on
this somewhere?
-Matt
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : http
well like every time we make an api query in the shell we get a return
result from the query. how are we handling those return results and
evaluating codes etc?
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Matt Joyce
> wrote:
>
I actually just use a devstack install inside of a vm and do a full
setup.py install with all the dependencies. Then if I need to i rebuild or
rebuild the vm.
I shell scripted some direct to libvirt stuff to make it just fire up at
will from scratch if needed or just restart the vm.
-Matt
On W
My point of concern.
\
If an agent is being built into the compute nodes, that would best be a
split out project.
Two major reasons. First and foremost sub projects should not be spinning
up their own agents. Secondly, there is a use case of agents outside of
metering.
If an agent is to be buil
libvirt can pull hard cpu stats. which can be useful. for instance it can
pick out the cpu generation names.
-matt
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:35 PM, James R Penick wrote:
>
>> >>-> In addition to a signature, I think we would need a se
es of nehalems. We had
no means to do that at the time.
Scheduling full instances is somewhat easier so long as all the nodes in
your zone are full instance use only.
Matt Joyce
Now at Cloudscaling
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:49 AM, John Paul Walters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Ma
s/APT/API/
s/of/or/
Please forgive spelling errors. On a train atm.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> We did some considerable HPC testing when I worked over at NASA Ames with
> the Nebula project. So I think we may have been the first to try out
> openstack
First rule of security group. Do not talk about security group.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rogerio Goncalves wrote:
> Maybe you missed the rules of security group?
>
> Rogério Gonçalves
> roge...@gmail.com
> Cel: (11) 8840-9790
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Leander Bessa Be
I love graphviz as a charting tool and sphinx support inline is great.
Used to use it all the time at nebula in the work wiki.
-Matt
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 05/24/2012 10:46 AM, Yun Mao wrote:
>
>> Sandy,
>>
>> I like the suggestion of graphvis, although I haven'
Do we want a history of deltas or just last delta and leave the history to
UI implementers?
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 05:42 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > IIRC, the meters discussed in the wiki [1] are supposed to show "delta"
> values (usage since the la
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CloudInit
Might want to check this little beastie out. Folks using kvm seem to end
up here for certain use cases.
-Matt
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Nicolae Paladi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for more information about file injection support in Open
+1 Simple. And works for most other projects well enough.
-Matt
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> James E. Blair wrote:
> > I believe we should at least have the common set of three mailing lists
> > (announce, user/operator, dev) and have a web page that lists them.
>
>
ute to try to avoid wasting all
> of that by putting a hypervisor on top.
>
> - Michael Chapman
>
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Matt Joyce
> wrote:
>
>> We did some considerable HPC testing when I worked over at NASA Ames with
>> the Nebula project. So
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2012/5/30 Matt Joyce :
> > Secondly, while LXC does provide a lot of native access, it still does
> > paging management internally just as kvm does. So direct memory
> management
> > ( some HPC users like this ) bec
You may be better off considering a different approach all together.
We ran into similar issues involving FISMA constraints and data
classification in the past. One
'simple' solution is complete segregation ( not to be confused with
isolation ). What we ended up coming up with was to basically d
I believe swift CAN be used as a block device via FUSE, and I believe it
has been done before. I wouldn't recommend it though.
-Matt
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Sebastien, you are correct.
>
> Udit, you will need to provide a bit more information on what you are
> looki
https://github.com/cloudscaling/tarkin
This is a very minimal test set that supports pinging vms after launching
them.
Nothing crazy.
-Matt
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 05:26 AM, Neelakantam Gaddam wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Recently I came across the tool
This is continuity on a thread I was having with Scott Moser about his
blueprint on config drive improvements:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/config-drive-v2
I had suggested adding the current keystone API url path ( from flags ) to
metadata api response.
The fundamental logic on my
I would recommend keeping a clear separation of administrative APIs from
user APIs. Some policy restrictions in environments require them. EX:
FISMA
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> Alternatively, if anyone would like to tar and feather me for picking port
> 5000 in the f
yes there is. check out the python-novaclient, or use euca2ools.
Cheers,
Matt
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Trinath Somanchi <
trinath.soman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi-
>
> With out using Horizon, is there any command line Openstack for
> configuring and bringing up instances?
>
>
>
> --
Can we set a location to the Authoritative HACKING.rst?
There are fundamental and conflicting differences between the HACKING.rst
in some of the projects.
-Matt
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:01:10PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Danie
+1
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
wrote:
> those are supposed to be ip addresses, so I would go with doc bug now
> unless there is a good reason to change it.
>
> Vish
>
> On Jun 28, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
>
> > Maybe I sent this out too late at night;
P) and where we require IP addresses,
> do resolution.
>
> Nate
> On Jun 28, 2012 7:55 PM, "Matt Joyce" wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya <
>> vishvana...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> those a
27;s just me but "ip address" and "host" seem to be
> synonyms.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Matt Joyce
> wrote:
>
>> https://review.openstack.org/9153 now as a review.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Nathanael
Semy,
Google app engine and google compute engine are two different things.
App engine has been around for quite some time. The compute engine that
they offer as an IaaS solution is based off internal google software that
has also been in use internally for a lengthy amount of time.
Honestl
I like the idea of making this a flagfile option.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 09:25:10PM -0400, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> > > So, maybe setting any of this environment variables for nova-compute
> > > to desired value sholuld help.
> >
>
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Simon G. wrote:
> Secondly, I don't think we shouldn't compare GCE to Openstack. I
> understand that right now cloud (Openstack, Amazon, ...) is just easy in
> use, managed and scalable datacenter. It allows users to create VMs, upload
> their images, easily increa
Grizzly is better than people making who is john galt jokes.
+1 to grizzly.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Mark Collier wrote:
> +1 grizzly
>
>
> On Jul 3, 2012, at 7:45 PM, "Gabriel Hurley"
> wrote:
>
> +1 on “close enough to an arbitrary territory and also a great name”.
> ;-)
>
> **
It might be nice to set it up so that openstack admins can add metadata
values to the metadata server for installation wide use.
-Matt
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Steve Baker wrote:
> Hi Vish
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya
> wrote:
> > Metadata is supposed to be use
Don't know if we want it.
But we may want to consider the idea of satellite read only keystone
servers.
Mind you that may just be solving problems we don't even have yet.
-Matt
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Adam Young wrote:
> I am contemplating writing up a post-Folsom Blueprint for Keyst
That's 1 PM west coast USA. I think the biggest concern may be Asia.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
>
> Would it be possible a bit earlier ? This would be 10pm in Europe so it
> would limit the participation.
>
> Tim
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: openstack-bounces+
I think that's probably fine. Might conflict with lunch... but you know
you gotta decide whats important to you =P.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:14 AM, John Paul Walters wrote:
> Earlier is totally fine. I want to strike a balance with the people on
> the west coast. How about noon EDT or even 1
https://launchpad.net/~openstack-portuguese-translation-team
Created.
Took a shot at translating horizon this weekend. Got a review pending.
Didn't see an existing team for this so I created it in the same style as
the simplified chinese team.
Hope this makes sense.
-Matt
_
To certain extent I agree with george's sentiment.
Recent example... we're changing tenants to projects in the keystone api.
Yes we maintain v2 api compatibility but there will be a cost to users in
the confusion of decisions like this. George is right to be calling for
openstack to grow up.
T
I agree if someone wants to commit a backported fix. This makes sense to
do. It's a pretty significant bug for essex users.
-Matt
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Christian Parpart wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:56 PM, John Postlethwait <
> john.postlethw...@nebula.com> wrote:
>
>> Well
As a non admin user. Querying the keystone v2 API is there a way for me to
get a list of the tenants that I am a member of? Or is that only a v3
thing?
-Matt
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> On 07/17/2012 03:47 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>
>> As a non admin user. Querying the keystone v2 API is there a way for me
>> to get a list of the tenants that I am a member of? Or is that only a v3
>> thing?
>&g
curl -H "X-Auth-Token:123456789001234" http://localhost:5000/v2.0/tenants
that seems to do the trick for me for now.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> On 07/17/2012 03:55 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Adam Young wrote:
>
nts": [
> {
> "enabled": true,
> "description": null,
> "name": "my-project",
> "id": "2cf2efb1da5c4d5b8c97d8055ff3b5d8"
> },
> {
> "enabled": true,
> "desc
Anyone by any chance know how to read out the auth_token or raw_token that
is acquired in keystoneclient when it performs a client.Client()
Authenticate?
I'd love to be able to read that. And it's totally not documented anywhere
if it exists.
-Matt
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:19 PM,
I could see service users and security / operations teams having a need to
span many domains.
-Matt
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
> ** **
>
> I thought that the v3 API supports domains as a group of tenants which
> would make the question rather different.
>
> ** **
>
>
rojects, and I think that is clearer.
>
>
> It certainly makes sense for a user to belong to one domain, but have
> access to a project controlled in another domain. Here is a scenario.
> Joe's Sporting Goods and Local Bank are both companies that have a presense
> in a
Up the Padraig!
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:39 PM, John Postlethwait <
john.postlethw...@nebula.com> wrote:
> +1 for more core contributors!
>
> John Postlethwait
> Nebula, Inc.
> 206-999-4492
>
> On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone!
>
> Padraig has
+1 to Kiall's response.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Kiall Mac Innes wrote:
> Until recently, stating that "Ubuntu is the official distro for OpenStack"
> wouldn't have hurt anybody's feelings.. That's changing now, with the
> Fedora+RedHat/Debian guys getting everything solid on their respe
input on whether this makes sense, or can be improved
upon as an idea and formalized as a rule for using the metadata api without
abusing it.
Cheers,
Matt Joyce
PS:
My current work effort in regards to this is related to passing keystone
credentials to instances via pam authentication. So
e metadata API on a number of things. But it's only
functional in some reduced set of openstack deployments, it's not held to
the same level of scrutiny as an API query set. And that means it's not
going to be usable today. It means it MIGHT be usable sometime in the
future maybe b
Scott thanks =P
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
What I am doing is putting credentials into user sessions on the instance.
-Matt
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Martin Packman <
martin.pack...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On 24/07/2012, Jay Pipes wrote:
> >
> > The OpenStack Compute API POST /servers command creates a server UUID
> > that is pa
> All I am saying is that Nova knows the instance's ID at the time that a
> config-drive can be created and installed into the instance. You can't
> do that with the "user data" EC2 API stuff, but you can with
> config-drive. Which is why I was recommending using config-drive.
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
>
I think for HPCC you will need a significant physical system deployment
using matched configurations. Likely your concerns will be providing
specific hardware constratins where I/O is a factor that match with what
HPCC users would use. IE 10 gig or infiniband in networking. Lots of
ram. Full sy
I like making it optional with a default of off. At least for now.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/List
I have read a few master thesis' written concerning openstack's overall
security issues. I would suggest however that openstack has been changing
drastically to date and getting a handle on its security issues is
something of a highly volatile moving target.
-Matt
Quick refs:
http://www.slide
I thought so until I read that security vulnerability report the other day
=P
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Doug Hellmann
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Adam Young wrote:
>
>> On 07/30/2012 05:17 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 13:50 -0700, Bhuvaneswar
+1
On Jul 31, 2012 10:52 AM, "Bhuvaneswaran A" wrote:
> Stefano,
>
> If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
> author only. Each subscriber should use "Reply to All" every time, to
> post a reply to mailing list.
>
> Can you please configure the mailing list and set repl
> That being said, I realize we're entering mostly a land of religion here.
> So I'll just end with a "long live emacs!" to try to get us to the godwin
> rule as fast as possible.
>
>
The Nazis had "Headers" too.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~o
> I'm sure Launchpad doesn't support user level configuration, to edit
> email headers.
>
>
We're moving off of launchpad to mailman proper anyways.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe
We really can't be breaking compatibility where people are probably writing
shell scripts.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://
I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this.
This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a
homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our users
are going to despise us for. And that hatred will outlive any benefit.
Users only rem
I'd go further and say that regardless of who the person is, or the
situation this list and this community has been pretty on the ball in
ensuring that people treat each other with respect. There have been a
number of incidents in which folks have wandered into questionable
territory on this and I
George I like your contributions.
I also like the idea of people treating each other well. Makes it easier
for us to have the discussions you want to have.
-Matt
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> On Thu 02 Aug 2012 07:19:28 AM PDT, George Reese wrote:
> > ignore the fa
You are using virsh directly. Don't do that. Let openstack suspend
nodes. Otherwise yes openstack will not know that you have decided to play
with virsh.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Trinath Somanchi <
trinath.soman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi-'
>
> I have been testing the openstack for past
point of clarity... it should figure out the vm is in a bad state
eventually and list it as not running.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> You are using virsh directly. Don't do that. Let openstack suspend
> nodes. Otherwise yes openstack will not know that you h
Do you have a final count on how many people responded?
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Nick Lothian wrote:
> For those that are interested, I've done a write-up of the results from
> this: http://fifthvertex.com/2012/08/07/cloud-tools-survey/
>
> Thanks for all those who responded.
>
> Nick
>
>
I have to ask. Wasn't FUSE designed to do alot of this stuff? It is
userspace and it doesn't do nasty stuff to file systems. Why aren't we
going that route?
-Matt
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:08:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
In the short term you might be able to setup something with a horizon
customization module...
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/horizon/topics/customizing.html
In the long term I think federation should be a concern for grizzly
planning in horizon. But maybe I am just being a little too optimi
Is anyone opposed to me adding quota information to usage.base. ?
I'd like to add the graph bars from _launch_details_help.html to provide a
quick heads up on where you are in terms of current allocation of resources
against quotas.
Maybe later we can provide some graphing of deltas in resource
de of the
cloud. Let init negotiate the api access and produce the filesystems it
needs to get booted up properly.
=/ first world problems.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Eric Windisch wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 at 14:30 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>
> I have to ask. Wasn'
+1 to everything dean said.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Andrew Clay Shafer
> wrote:
> > You say OpenStack has survived, but I believe we may have compounded and
> > multiplied the challenges OpenStack faces by collectively neglecting t
** **
>
> **- **Gabriel
>
> ** **
>
> *From:*
> openstack-bounces+gabriel.hurley=nebula@lists.launchpad.net[mailto:
> openstack-bounces+gabriel.hurley=nebula@lists.launchpad.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Matt Joyce
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 14, 2012 12:24 PM
+10
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Gabriel Hurley
wrote:
> For two summits running I've been advocating the need for a common
> standard of functionality for all OpenStack APIs (things like sorting, bulk
> operations, filtering, pagination, etc.). I intend to push on the issue
> even harder th
I've already put a dent in the pt / pt_br translations for horizon. I'd
love some assistance though. Especially since my portuguese is secondary
and honestly not very fluent.
-Matt
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Gabriel Hurley
wrote:
> In conjunction with the PTLs, the Docs team, the Infrast
Update on Horizon pt_BR
Translated 234 32.28% Remaining 491 67.72% Reviewed 0 0.00%
About a third of the way through now.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> I've already put a dent in the pt / pt_br translations for horizon. I'd
> love some assistance tho
Muito Brigado. =P
I'm American and I could use the assistance. =P
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Marcelo Dieder wrote:
> I'm Brazilian, and I'll help with the translation.
>
> Marcelo Dieder
>
>
> On 22-08-2012 22:38, Matt Joyce wrote:
>
>
> Up
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
