r=zadarastorage@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+vladimir=zadarastorage@lists.launchpad.net]
On Behalf Of Stefano Maffulli
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 10:35 AM
To: openstack
Subject: [Openstack] Creating openstack-dev mailing list
Jesse Andrews (anotherjesse)(Rackspace)
Jonathan Bryce (jbryce)(R
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 10:11 -0500, Anne Gentle wrote:
> Link is:
>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
Since you mention this list, I was asked in Boston by the
'spring-cleaning-department': why do we have some lists that seem
abandoned on http://lists.openst
My .02 -
Pretty much every Open Source project I've been involved in has two lists set
up like this, once they get off the ground. Like others have said, it doesn't
mean the groups separate, only that the discussions are easier to follow...
Cheers,
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Leandro Reox wrote:
> How is the rest of the community going to participate or leave their
> opinion on why some design path is going to be taken, or maybe leave
> their feedback of why an arquitecture change is going to be made. Will
> be an open list ? or just for few ?
I think the idea is not
Leandor Reox wrote:
> How is the rest of the community going to participate or leave their opinion
> on why some design
> path is going to be taken, or maybe leave their feedback of why an
> arquitecture change is going
> to be made. Will be an open list ? or just for few ?
> Will be launchapd
lit is necessary
>>> at this point? Most (if not all) of the traffic is developer oriented, what
>>> is the problem we want to solve?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: openstack-boun
I'd prefer not to split the [OpenStack] list just yet but promote
[Openstack-operators] and maybe rename it Openstack-ops. Might sound
counterintuitive but seems to provide for the stated goals of welcoming new
users. It is getting more posts.
Link is:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailma
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 22:11 -0400, John Purrier wrote:
> Stefano, can you elaborate on why the developers feel a split is necessary
> at this point? Most (if not all) of the traffic is developer oriented, what
> is the problem we want to solve?
the general feedback I had is that the volume of mess
; From: openstack-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net
>> [mailto:openstack-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf
>> Of Stefano Maffulli
>> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 1:35 PM
>> To: openstack
>> Subject: [Openstack] Creating openstack-d
roblem we want to solve?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: openstack-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> [mailto:openstack-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf
> Of Stefano Maffulli
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2
=openstack@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf
Of Stefano Maffulli
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 1:35 PM
To: openstack
Subject: [Openstack] Creating openstack-dev mailing list
Jesse Andrews (anotherjesse)(Rackspace)
Jonathan Bryce (jbryce)(Rackspace)
Devin Carlen (devcamcar)(Nebula)
Thierry C
Stefano,
How is the rest of the community going to participate or leave their opinion
on why some design path is going to be taken, or maybe leave their feedback
of why an arquitecture change is going to be made. Will be an open list ? or
just for few ?
Will be launchapd the only way to interact w
I would not be opposed to this. I think we may have reached that
critical mass where a split makes sense now.
-jay
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> Jesse Andrews (anotherjesse)(Rackspace)
> Jonathan Bryce (jbryce)(Rackspace)
> Devin Carlen (devcamcar)(Nebula)
> Thierry C
Jesse Andrews (anotherjesse)(Rackspace)
Jonathan Bryce (jbryce)(Rackspace)
Devin Carlen (devcamcar)(Nebula)
Thierry Carrez (ttx)(Rackspace)
John Dickinson (notmyname)(Rackspace))
Vish Ishaya (vishy)(Rackspace)
Josh Kearney (jk0)(Rackspace)
Joshua McKenty (jmckenty)(Piston)
Ewan Mellor (ewanmellor)(
14 matches
Mail list logo
