[This is a partial repost from another topic]
I have a question, regarding Windows binaries.
(We build our own for x86/amd64 using the documented procedure, the compilers
installed are Visual Studio 2019, with latest updates).
I take it (might be wrong, because the build scripts are complex to
> This is very useful! Can you post an udate to the wiki?
> https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Binaries
Wiki has been updated with details of the binaries and download
locations.
Angus
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
This is very useful! Can you post an udate to the wiki?
https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Binaries
On 2/21/18, 8:57 AM, "Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd"
wrote:
Windows developers may be interested in our Win32 build of OpenSSL
1.1.1-pre1 (alpha), the binaries are
Windows developers may be interested in our Win32 build of OpenSSL
1.1.1-pre1 (alpha), the binaries are digitally code signed 'Open Source
Developer, François PIETTE', the lead developer for the Delphi Internet
Component Suite project. About half way down the page at:
http://wiki.o
Hi all,
does anybody know if there are downloadable binaries of openssl-fips
and/or openssl-fips-ecp (2.0.16 or earlier) for Windows ?
Cheers,
Max
--
Best Regards,
Massimiliano Pala, Ph.D.
OpenCA Labs Director
OpenCA Logo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
openssl
can I fix this error ?
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of
Satya Das
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 5:48 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Binaries exit with signature bytes
>What platform are you buil
>What platform are you building? Is it a native or cross compile?
>You'd get that behaviour if fipsld isn't linking the binaries properly.
Thanks Steve. I am on centos 6, native compile. I saw " /libcrypto.so is not
cross-compiler aware." with fipsld linking until
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016, Satya Das wrote:
>
> I am building a fips capable openssl package and running into a condition
> where all binaries exit with a signature in the stdout. As far as I can tell
> it is the incore hash. It seems FINGERPRINT_premain() is findin
Hello,
I am building a fips capable openssl package and running into a condition where
all binaries exit with a signature in the stdout. As far as I can tell it is
the incore hash. It seems FINGERPRINT_premain() is finding a ? in the
FINGERPRINT_ascii_value and branching to exit(0).
What am I
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:05:52PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Is there an official OpenSSL github account with prebuilt binaries for
> platforms like iOS and Android?
>
> If so, where is it?
Prebuilt binaries of security toolkits should in my view come only
from the platform
> Is there an official OpenSSL github account with prebuilt binaries for
> platforms like iOS and Android?
>
> If so, where is it?
There's this: https://www.openssl.org/about/binaries.html
> If not, should there be?
If someone wants to step forward we can a
Is there an official OpenSSL github account with prebuilt binaries for
platforms like iOS and Android?
If so, where is it?
If not, should there be?
___
openssl-users mailing list
openssl-users@openssl.org
https://mta.opensslfoundation.net/mailman
On 12/3/2014 9:41 AM, T K wrote:
Is there any other way to download binaries for Win32/64?
http://slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support
> http://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html gives an "404 not found" error.
> Is there any other way to download binaries for Win32/64?
They moved to the ‘about’ area. The FAQ is auto-generated and I forgot to
update that. Fixed, thanks.
:��I"Ϯ��r�m
(Z+�K �
Hi,
maybe I missed the information but
http://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html gives an "404 not found"
error. Is there any other way to download binaries for Win32/64?
Thanks,
Thorsten
Hi,
maybe I missed the information that the files are not available any more...
http://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html gives an "404 not found"
error. Is there any other way to download binaries for Win32/64?
Thanks,
Thorsten
Thanks to all for information.
Special thanks to Geoff for mentioning the assembly code. As he mentioned
the assembly code was making thousands of UMRs and the code dump in Purify
instrumented code. I was able to complete my test cases and found few
memory leaks in our code.
Thanks again for the h
Sanjith Chungath wrote:
I am getting thousands of UMRs and finally one segmentation error and a
core dump while trying to create a keystore. Am using 0.9.8g. Everything
works fine without purify. I also tried rebuilding openssl with PURIFY"
compiler option. But that also didnt help me.
Compi
On Thursday 02 October 2008 06:40:53 Sanjith Chungath wrote:
> I am getting thousands of UMRs and finally one segmentation error and
> a core dump while trying to create a keystore. Am using 0.9.8g.
> Everything works fine without purify. I also tried rebuilding openssl
> with PURIFY" compiler opti
Thanks Chris, I appreciate you taking time to respond & help.
Parind.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 8:35 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/12/06, Pa
On 5/12/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That works Chris.
Obviously I'm missing a step, can you please tell me what did you do to
build the static version of 64 bit binaries? I want to be able to build
them and not keep bothering you.
Thanks again,
Parind.
-Origi
That works Chris.
Obviously I'm missing a step, can you please tell me what did you do to
build the static version of 64 bit binaries? I want to be able to build
them and not keep bothering you.
Thanks again,
Parind.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROT
On 5/12/06, hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set this
> time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed all tests.
> I
On 5/11/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris,
I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set this
time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed all tests.
I ran in on 64 bit Win 2003 Server R2.
One thing I'm still struggling
Chris,
I was able to use binaries you provided & also create my own set this
time. Here's the output of the test.bat. Looks like it passed all tests.
I ran in on 64 bit Win 2003 Server R2.
One thing I'm still struggling with is that I can't build the static
libs for the 64 bi
Chris,
I really appreciate you taking time to build 64 bit binaries. I'll try
to use it and get back to you.
Many thanks in advance,
Parind.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:45 AM
To: op
Excellent. Many Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hunter
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:45 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/8/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is
On 5/8/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to include 64 bit binaries as well?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:12 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: 0.9.8b w
code.
>
> Are you saying that if I build and provide a package with static libs
> and headers that an application could use this to compile smaller
> binaries?
Yes.
> I will look for instructions on how to do this...
You should find ms/ntdll.mak as well as ms/nt.mak, one sp
ompile smaller
binaries?
Yes.
I will look for instructions on how to do this...
You should find ms/ntdll.mak as well as ms/nt.mak, one spits out dynamic libs
into out32dll/, the other static libs into out32/.
__
OpenSSL P
y, May 07, 2006 12:56 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
morning.
> My apologies to all.
>
> >> Hummm. I d
On 5/8/06, Parind Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to include 64 bit binaries as well?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:12 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: 0.9.8b w
l.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill,
Are you saying that if I build and provide a package with static libs
and headers that an application could use this to compile smaller
binaries?
I will look for instructions on ho
Is it possible to include 64 bit binaries as well?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wai Wu
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:12 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries
Yes. Please hunter. Please include the
@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this
morning.
> My apologies to all.
>
> >> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
>
> I was g
Mike Ehlert wrote:
but what I'm after now is some information on any tricks to compiling
the DLL's with only the features needed for my application to reduce
their size.
Typically one links to the static library then, which of course will only
link in .obj files that are consumed. One bit of
On 5/7/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this morning.
My apologies to all.
>> Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b binari
Oops. looks like I sent a blank reply to the list earlier this morning.
My apologies to all.
Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/,
I was going to comment that this site does not offer the 0.9.8b binaries,
but what I'm after now is some information on any tric
- Original Message -
From: "Wai Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 2:36 PM
Subject: RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries
Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/, and I am
using Visual Studio 2005 C++, and everything works fine.
Thnx. I will give it a try.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 5:50 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
A fairly good random number generator can be found via
works fine. Ofcourse, I have the issue
of getting a good random number generator.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Sat 5/6/2006 12:31 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
First off, those aren'
: Sat 5/6/2006 12:31 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries
First off, those aren't official. They seem to be compiled by VC++ 6,
which seems to be binary-incompatible with VC++ .Net 2002+. (I use
VC++2005 Express Edition, at the moment, and I can't get a
First off, those aren't official.
Any inquiries about the Shining Light Productions binaries need to be
directed there.
Thanks Kyle. I sent him an email 2 days ago but haven't hear back yet.
I went ahead and compiled 0.9.8b on my own today, and I noticed that
libeay32.dll is 1,089
roductions binaries need to be
directed there.
He might be modifying his build process to include a FIPS-compliant
version of 0.9.7j -- I just don't know.
-Kyle H
On 5/5/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone tell me how long it usually takes after a release before the
offi
Can anyone tell me how long it usually takes after a release before the
official Windows binaries are updated (at Shining Light Productions)?
Regards, Mike
__
OpenSSL Project http
Thanks Kyle, much appreciated!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OpenSSL-binaries-on-the-%28shared%29-server-t1079747.html#a2818694
Sent from the OpenSSL - User forum at Nabble.com.
__
OpenSSL Project
l be uploaded
> to the server (and the Public Cert will also be uploaded to PayPal).
> Apparently, in order to generate PayPal buttons "on the fly", I also need to
> upload "OpenSSL binaries" to the server. What I need to know is:
>
> 1) what files exactly do I nee
order to generate PayPal buttons “on the fly”, I also need to upload “OpenSSL binaries” to the server. What I need to know is:
1) what files exactly do I need to upload? (Server is running Linux).
2) Is this normally something that my host provider needs to be involved in (I have a shared server ac
Hi,
As the new MacIntel are there, I want to build Universal Binaries of
OpenSSL on a PowerPC MacOSX. How can I do that?
There are 2 URL on Apple's developer site describing that process:
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Porting/Conceptual/PortingUnix/compiling/chapter_4_sect
This is free, although:
1) you have to register
2) the latest copy is 9.7d
Note that:
1) it is in RPM format
2) OPen SSH is available from the same page, though in installp format
(use smitty)
3) both may have their libraries in funny places (typically IBM, they
know better), so if you compile o
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:57:55 -0700, Joseph Bruni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
brunij> If you build your application on OS X or Darwin, you'll run into the
brunij> really nasty problem where the LinkEditor will bind your app to shared
brunij> libraries even if you spe
stion
If I build applications using a later version of
openssl and run the compiled binaries on an
operating system with earlier versions of openssl
will there be any problems?
Example: I build applications using openssl 0.9.7b on
linux redhat version 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7 and gnu gcc 2.96
and the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:52:21 -0600, Mark Rowe <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
rowe> If I build applications using a later version of
rowe> openssl and run the compiled binaries on an
rowe> operating system with earlier versions of openssl
rowe> wi
Question
If I build applications using a later version of
openssl and run the compiled binaries on an
operating system with earlier versions of openssl
will there be any problems?
Example: I build applications using openssl 0.9.7b on
linux redhat version 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7 and gnu gcc 2.96
and
Hi,
Question
If I build applications using a later version of
openssl and run the compiled binaries on an
operating system with earlier versions of openssl
will there be any problems?
Example: I build applications using openssl 0.9.7b on
linux redhat version 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7 and gnu gcc
Rabellino Sergio wrote:
Hi peter, which tool are you using to create .msi packages ??
It's a freeware one ?
It's my own code that creates the package, read this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-dev&m=103210259026139&w=2
also
http://www.runestig.com/msiutil.html
Cheers,
- Peter
--
Peter
Peter 'Luna' Runestig wrote:
Marcel Elsner wrote:
Hi,
i am sick of compiling everything again and again using 3 or more
different compilers. I really tried it but now just want
running code. Is anybody out there who allready has the binarys for
windows 2000? if, then please send it or give m
Marcel Elsner wrote:
Hi,
i am sick of compiling everything again and again using 3 or more
different compilers. I really tried it but now just want
running code. Is anybody out there who allready has the binarys for
windows 2000? if, then please send it or give me
a link where i can download.
Hi,
i am sick of compiling everything again and again
using 3 or more different compilers. I really tried it but now just want
running code. Is anybody out there who allready has the binarys for windows 2000? if, then please
send it or give me
a link where i can download.
thx & happy
t the version made available by Activestate
(0.17) doesn't seem to.
Does anyone have a modern Win32/Activestate compatable version of
Crypt::SSLeay compiled and wouldn't mind giving me the binaries?
Thank you!
__
In light of the recent vulnerabilities announced in openssl, I am attempting
to recompile packages against openssl-0.9.6e. Finding binaries/libraries
compiled against shared libraries has been straightforward. However, I
have no clue how to approach finding binaries/libraries that have
From: "Andrew T. Finnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:23 PM
Subject: RE: binaries
> What kind of platforms are we looking to have this on?
> I have somewhat access to a large set of machines including the
> following:
>
ing on the traffic received it can cost
A pretty penny. I would like some ideas as to what could be done with
this and what people would/wouldn't do for
These binaries. This could become a great way to alleviate the build
pain some people experience.
-
Andrew T. Finnell
Active Solutio
A note on this: if someone wants to produce OpenSSL binaries in a
consistent way and put them out somewhere, I'd be happy to link to
them or the directory they're in.
Note that consistently means that there should be some kind of note
saying exactly how the binaries were produced a
Title: Message
Paul,
Well someone can't just give you binaries because you would need a build
specific to your compiler and the settings you want for your application. You
should probably ought to list your problem including platform , compiler and
set
onday, March 25, 2002 11:11
PM
Subject: RE: binaries
Paul,
Did you post what the problem was during your
compile?
-Andrew T.
FinnellSoftware EngineereSecurity Inc(321)
394-2485
-Original Message-From: Paul E. Pr
, 2002 5:10
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
binaries
Hi all,
Can I download the binaries for
win32 somewhere?
I tried almost everything to compile but could
not fix it.
Please help!!!
Regards,
Paul
Hi all,
Can I download the binaries for
win32 somewhere?
I tried almost everything to compile but could not
fix it.
Please help!!!
Regards,
Paul
: Radi Shourbaji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 13 September 2001 08:50
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: WIN32 binaries anyone??
>Importance: High
>I am in search of pre-built binaries for WIN32 to use in conjunction with
curl in a w2k environment. Any help wo
I use the ones from m2crypto (python bindings) site
http://www.pobox.org.sg/home/ngps/m2/
the libs themself are at:
http://www.pobox.org.sg/home/ngps/m2/openssl-0.9.6-win32.zip
---
Hannu
__
OpenSSL Project
I am in
search of pre-built binaries for WIN32 to use in conjunction with curl in a w2k
environment. Any help would be
appreciated!
Thanks!
Radi
Hello,
M2Crypto 0.05p1 is now available, in source and Win32 binary
packages.
M2Crypto is a Python interface to OpenSSL's ciphers, message
digests and SSL and S/MIME functionality.
Get it here:
http://www.post1.com/home/ngps/m2
As usual, feedback is welcome.
--
Ng Pheng Siong <[EMAIL P
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 11:23:36PM +0100, Reiner Buehl wrote:
> I could provide a swinstall version if people are interrested, but I
> do not have a ftp site to make it available.
Binaries are not provided at the OpenSSL download site, so the problem for
people is finding them.
I don'
On Friday 17 November 2000 17:23, Reiner Buehl wrote:
> I could provide a swinstall version if people are interrested, but I
> do not have a ftp site to make it available.
That would be great! You could probably submit to the HP Packaging Project
too
--
George Staikos
___
0 11:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Announcement: OpenSSL 0.9.6 binaries for HP-UX 10.20
>
>
> Hi!
>
> Due to the questions arising on this list during the last days I have
> decided to provide binaries of OpenSSL 0.9.6 for HP-UX 10.20.
> In fact, I just tar'
Hi!
Due to the questions arising on this list during the last days I have
decided to provide binaries of OpenSSL 0.9.6 for HP-UX 10.20.
In fact, I just tar'ed together my own installation and wrote a README :-)
You can download it at:
ftp://ftp.aet.tu-cottbus.de/pub/postfix_tls/re
Craig Manley wrote:
> Hi all,
> I've got the free Borland C++ 5.5 compiler but I can't compile the
> source on Win98. Has anybody got already compiled Win32 binaries (or a
> complete setup) that I could download?
You can grab them here (temporary):
http://www.mailbag.de
Hi all,
I've got the free Borland C++ 5.5 compiler but I can't compile the
source on Win98. Has anybody got already compiled Win32 binaries (or a
complete setup) that I could download?
P.S. I'm not a C programmer so I have no hope in figuring out how to
compile it myself
irctory, and instead have to do a
> "use lib" to a directory I can write to.
> 3 - Other things I don't know about
>
> My question is whether anyone knows of a source for precompiled binaries
> for openssl, or of another way to get PERL to speak https as a client that
Hello,
I'm writing an application that utilizes OpenSSL for
encryption/authentication. Certainly, I can make the application
binaries as strong as I want in the US, cryptographically-speaking. But,
if I wanted to generated some binaries that I knew were export-safe
outside the US, how wo
80 matches
Mail list logo
