----- Original Message ----- From: "Wai Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <openssl-users@openssl.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 2:36 PM
Subject: RE: 0.9.8b windows binaries


Hummm. I downloaded the binary from http://hunter.campbus.com/, and I am using Visual Studio 2005 C++, and everything works fine. Ofcourse, I have the issue of getting a good random number generator.


________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Sat 5/6/2006 12:31 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: 0.9.8b windows binaries



First off, those aren't official.  They seem to be compiled by VC++ 6,
which seems to be binary-incompatible with VC++ .Net 2002+.  (I use
VC++2005 Express Edition, at the moment, and I can't get anything to
run when linked against those.)

Any inquiries about the Shining Light Productions binaries need to be
directed there.

He might be modifying his build process to include a FIPS-compliant
version of 0.9.7j -- I just don't know.

-Kyle H

On 5/5/06, Mike Ehlert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone tell me how long it usually takes after a release before the
official Windows binaries are updated (at Shining Light Productions)?


Regards,  Mike

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]




______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    openssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to