Re: binaries built with openssl 0.9.7b running on openssl 0.9.6b or 0.9.6g

[Joseph Bruni]

If you build your application on OS X or Darwin, you'll run into the 
really nasty problem where the LinkEditor will bind your app to shared 
libraries even if you specify static libraries.

(I found this out the hard way.)

Not fun.

On Mar 19, 2004, at 9:52 AM, Mark Rowe wrote:

Hi,

Question

If I build applications using a later version of
openssl and run the compiled binaries on an
operating system with earlier versions of openssl
will there be any problems?
Example: I build applications using openssl 0.9.7b on
linux redhat version 7.2 with kernel 2.4.7 and gnu gcc 2.96
and then run these binaries on linux redhat version 7.2 with
kernel 2.4.17 gnu gcc 2.96 that has openssl version 0.9.6g.     
Will there be any problems?

Thanks

-Mark-

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]