On Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:53:37 +0200,
Dan Heinz wrote:
>
> Another question is why I now need to link pthreads when I did not
> in the 1.0.2 version? I've added no-threads to the configuration,
> but I'm curious why I didn't need to previously link it. And I'd
> prefer not to change too many confi
> > > >The no-dso is silently not valid in 1.1.1c. That option didn't work
> > > >right, so it was unusable in practice anyway. However, someone recently
> > > >fixed that up, unfortunately after the last 1.1.1 release.
> > > >The specific patch may be possible to find on github (unless that br
On Tue, 08 Oct 2019 14:59:23 +0200,
Richard Levitte wrote:
>
> On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 21:55:50 +0200,
> Dan Heinz wrote:
> >
> > >The no-dso is silently not valid in 1.1.1c. That option didn't work
> > >right, so it was unusable in practice anyway. However, someone recently
> > >fixed that up, u
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 21:55:50 +0200,
Dan Heinz wrote:
>
> >The no-dso is silently not valid in 1.1.1c. That option didn't work right,
> >so it was unusable in practice anyway. However, someone recently fixed that
> >up, unfortunately after the last 1.1.1 release.
> >The specific patch may be po
>The no-dso is silently not valid in 1.1.1c. That option didn't work right, so
>it was unusable in practice anyway. However, someone recently fixed that up,
>unfortunately after the last 1.1.1 release.
>The specific patch may be possible to find on github (unless that branch has
>been deleted)
The no-dso is silently not valid in 1.1.1c. That option didn't work
right, so it was unusable in practice anyway. However, someone
recently fixed that up, unfortunately after the last 1.1.1 release.
The specific patch may be possible to find on github (unless that
branch has been deleted), otherw
A big Applause, Congrats
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> \applause all around!
>
> --
> Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu
> Machines should not be friendly. Machines should be obedient.
>
--
Warm Regards
--Dev
OpenPegasus Developer
"I'm one of
\applause all around!
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu
Machines should not be friendly. Machines should be obedient.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Wow you guys are rocking kudos
-- #contagious
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Steve Marquess
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:40 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Linux Foundation Core Infrastructure Ini
On 05/29/2014 11:39 AM, Steve Marquess wrote:
> I am very pleased to announce that the Linux Foundation Core
> Infrastructure Initiative (CII),
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/programs/core-infrastructure-initiative,
> has extended full time fellowships to Stephen Henson and Andy
> Polykov ...
Oo
On 05/13/2014 02:11 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Hi All/Steve,
>
> "Tech giants, chastened by Heartbleed, finally agree to fund OpenSSL",
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/04/tech-giants-chastened-by-heartbleed-finally-agree-to-fund-openssl/.
>
> Its been a few weeks since the a
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Giuseppe Barbieri wrote:
> I am using OpenSSL for a cuda project.
>
> I just imported all the project from win to linux (Eclipse)
>
> I solved all the dependencies except this annoying error:
>
>> Invalid arguments ' Candidates are: int BN_set_word(bignum_st *, ?) '
why and how?
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:35 AM, F. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Program that want use Engine should enable it.
> It's posible enable engine for all program without the program request
> without patch?
>
> Any plan to use linux kernel engine support in openssl software?
>
>
ate: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:01:47 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: Linux OpenSSL and Watchguard
>
> Er, what are you trying to do? OpenSSL is a library which is used by
> other applications to support strongly-authenticated and
> c
Er, what are you trying to do? OpenSSL is a library which is used by
other applications to support strongly-authenticated and
cryptographically-secured communications. The openssl executable
itself is simply there for testing and utility functionality; it does
not do any special protocol communic
The library works also with last openSSL version. I send also a complete
trace of the execution with the last openSSL version on linux.
Regards,
Pervasive Computing Laboratory
- - --
This program is a test tool for attribute certificate wrapper
Cre
Thanks for the pointer Dr.Steve.
Regards
Yugandhar
At 03:49 PM 9/28/2006, you wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006, Yugandhar wrote:
> Hi,
>I am currently using OpenSSL 0.9.7e which has the option linux-elf-arm
> for ARM processors.Recently i downloaded OpenSSL 0.9.8c.It seems that the
> linux-elf-
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006, Yugandhar wrote:
> Hi,
>I am currently using OpenSSL 0.9.7e which has the option linux-elf-arm
> for ARM processors.Recently i downloaded OpenSSL 0.9.8c.It seems that the
> linux-elf-arm option has been removed from the Configure file.
>Can anyone throw some light on
: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Linux Threads blocking in openssl callback
Hi Sunil,
I am not having two threads working on the same SSL connection at the
same time. I have one thread which does the handshake (SSL_accept) and
AFTER the SSL_accept is finished successfully, I transfer the
Hi Sunil,
I am not having two threads working on the same SSL
connection at the same time. I have one thread which
does the handshake (SSL_accept) and AFTER the
SSL_accept is finished successfully, I transfer the
ownership of the connection (ssl and fd) to the second
thread. The second thread does
The implication is posted in an earlier message here.
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-users@openssl.org/msg38752.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aniruddha
Chiplunkar
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 1:47 PM
To: openssl-users@openss
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004, Ujval Lodha wrote:
> I'm testing Triple DES encryption speeds with the OpenSSL library on Linux
> on my machine.
>
> With dynamic linking, I get about 16 Mbytes per second whereas with static
> linking, I get only about 5 Mbytes per second. For compiling, I used:
>
> DYNAMI
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 20:13, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> Hmmm, you could try that same command with -port 995 (the SSL/TLS POP3
> port) and without -www and try connecting with OE. Its not a valid POP3
> server of course but it should be enough to see what OE does.
>
I tried that, too, and here i
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003, Thomas Koeller wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 18:01 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> > ...
> > You may have imported the root CA into the wrong store on WinXP. You
> > can check this by running:
> >
> > openssl s_server -www -cert /path/to/server.pem -key /path/to/key.pem
> >
>
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 18:01 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> ...
> You may have imported the root CA into the wrong store on WinXP. You
> can check this by running:
>
> openssl s_server -www -cert /path/to/server.pem -key /path/to/key.pem
>
> on the linux box.
>
> then connect to https://whatever.linux.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003, Thomas Koeller wrote:
> Next thing I did was to install the root certificate on a WinXP system
> on my LAN. I could import it into the certificate storage where all those
> certificates from trusted security providers are kept. This also worked,
> apparently without problems
>-Original Message-
>From: Rick Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 16 January 2002 19:27
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: linux/openssl/apache problem solved
>
>
>I found my problem.
>
>I was sure I had done everything right, but couldn't get a connection
>using https.
>
>Found out I
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 11:34:43AM +0200, Michael Ströder wrote:
> The error "undefined symbol: EVP_rc5_32_12_16_ofb" is raised during
> import M2Crypto if one does not take the announced requirement for
> SWIG _1.3.6_ serious ...
Heh heh. Why ever not, Michael? ;-)
> That's what I don't like a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Ng Pheng Siong wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've gotten a few messages about M2Crypto not working on
> >> Linux (Red Hat
> >> 7.1, SuSe 7.1) because "undefined symbol: EVP_rc5_32_12_16_ofb".
> >>
> >> I understand the packaged OpenSSL on those platforms are versions o
>-Original Message-
>From: Dr S N Henson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 27 July 2001 18:50
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Linux and EVP_rc5_32_12_16_ofb
>
>
>
>
>Ng Pheng Siong wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've gotten a
SORRY, WRONG SUBJECT
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to make and install openssl.0.9.6 on Linux S/390 to build mod_ssl for
apache.
For configure I use the no-asm option. After Configure I have to edit the
Makefile and remove the option '-m486' at the Compileroptions.
Do I have to use another option ?
During make following warning appear
> >
> > You'll have to patch ssh if you want to do that ... simple enough to do
> > by hand, but nonetheless one more irritating niggly. (patched for
> > glibc2.1 / RH6.0, that is)
> >
> > I would be happy to document the patch I used if enough people plan to
> > use RH6.0 + ssh.
> >
>
> I'll a
Steffen Dettmer a écrit :
> but I assume that
> RH includes at least a ssh, aint?
I don't think so as ssh is probably subject to u.s. export restrictions.
Fathi Ben Nasr.
__
OpenSSL Project
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> Does this mean that RH comes without ssh ?! OK, I compiled it myself
> always (the thing with the lastest stable version ;) ), but I assume that
> RH includes at least a ssh, aint?
American law has ridiculous export restrictions which could prohibit
Thornton Prime wrote:
> Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> >
> > > just to say that for me, Suse 6.0 (or 5.3) is pretty nice, easy to install, no
> > > broken packages.
> >
> > YES. :)
> >
> > The onliest bug I've found is that a raid level 1 (Mirror) device won't be
> > re-sync automatically (patch aviabl
> The first thing I do to a RedHat box if it's going to be a webserver,
> for example, is rip out all the apache-related RPMs and rebuild apache
> in /opt/www (usually we have a fast SCSI disk mounted on /opt). Then we
> compile ssh, add a JDK, fix /etc, and lock down the ports.
Does this mean t
Steffen Dettmer wrote:
>
> > just to say that for me, Suse 6.0 (or 5.3) is pretty nice, easy to install, no
> > broken packages.
>
> YES. :)
>
> The onliest bug I've found is that a raid level 1 (Mirror) device won't be
> re-sync automatically (patch aviable ;) ). RH 5.3 does not have this bug.
On Wed, 12 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> > Great! So what is it that is actually good about Linux, then? And RH in
> > particular? I find this all a bit peculiar coming from a background
> > where the answer to "which version?" is invariably "the latest stable
> >
I'm not the moderator, and I'm not sure how many others I'd
be speaking for if I asked you to kindly take this discussion
elsewhere... perhaps somewhere more appropriate (imagine that..)
Kindly consider doing so. Thank you,
"Carlo M. Arenas Belon" wrote:
/*
* > Erwann ABALEA wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
> Great! So what is it that is actually good about Linux, then? And RH in
> particular? I find this all a bit peculiar coming from a background
> where the answer to "which version?" is invariably "the latest stable
> one, of course".
Lots of people is trying to get out of MS
> But, I'm having my usual
> nightmare ... so are there any Linux gurus other there willing to help
> get the damn thing installed? I'm trying to do RH 6.0,
OH GOD NO! NOT A .0 VERSION!
Perhaps you would like the 5.2 release better, seeing as to how it is
not RAGINGLY UNSTABLE... I am far from
L PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Linux
>Ben Laurie wrote:
>
>> This is mostly off-topic, but in a good cause: I'm trying to install
>> Linux, not coz I have any real need, but so that I can more easily
>> support
Stop messing with huge downloads. The easiest way to install Linux
is from a bootable CD. Just put it in the drive and follow the
instructions. You can buy CD's for almost nothing from www.cheapbytes.com.
__
OpenSSL Project
Ben Laurie wrote:
> This is mostly off-topic, but in a good cause: I'm trying to install
> Linux, not coz I have any real need, but so that I can more easily
> support OpenSSL and related stuff, some of which is a major battle to
> compile on FreeBSD (unfortunately, IMNSHO). But, I'm having my u
I highly reccomend installing from CR rom. RH-6.0 is available
for less than 5$ US by mail order, and I'm sure it can be overnighted
for not much more.
Doing it by download is possible, but it's also asking for problems.
On Tue, 11 May 1999 Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> This is mostly off-topic, but i
I'm using linux RH5.2 with piecewise upgrade to 2.2.6 kernel... I have
OpenSSL working (no firewall). I can try to help.
Ben Laurie
>
> This is mostly off-topic, but in a good cause: I'm trying to install
> Linux, not coz I have any real need, but so that I can more easily
> support OpenSSL and
47 matches
Mail list logo
