> But, I'm having my usual > nightmare ... so are there any Linux gurus other there willing to help > get the damn thing installed? I'm trying to do RH 6.0, OH GOD NO! NOT A .0 VERSION! Perhaps you would like the 5.2 release better, seeing as to how it is not RAGINGLY UNSTABLE... I am far from a Linux Guru, but since 1) not enough people run Debian to make its tools & stability outweigh its weird /etc scheme 2) RedHat 6.0 is, in my own experience, CRAWLING with little gotchas re: X, glibc, etc., and 3) RedHat 5.2 is stable, relatively well tested, and essentially the Windows 95 of Linux I would *strongly* advise regressing to 5.2 for development and making the necessary patches to move to kernel 2.2.x and whatever else you care to do. RH6 is primarily better for new users because Enlightenment+GNOME feels a lot like Windows or a Mac. Unfortunately it seems like a LOT of bugs crawled in as the rush to get GNOME together commenced. If you would like, I can dig up the patches I applied on our RH5.2/Oracle box to go to 2.2. I have been running RH6 for a week or so now, ran Debian 2.1 for a while before that, and at home I even have a FreeBSD box next to my RH 5.2 box (neither has been booted in 2 weeks). I would suggest that, unless you are truly committed to glibc 2.1 and/or RH6.0, you consider using RH5.2. Or Debian, but that's an entirely other can of worms. (Debian feels a hell of a lot more like FreeBSD, since the whole thing is delivered as an integrated distribution, on the other hand the /etc layout is very different from the industry-standard RedHat Way; the difference is more like 98 vs. NT than night and day, but it can be a drag sometimes.) I would be remiss if I let a great developer's time go to waste simply due to Linux quirks. -- "Every man is guilty of all the good he didn't do." --Voltaire ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]