Yes, I use pthreads on Windows. Since you stated "How would you handle TSD,
for example? There is no *portable* way to hook the destruction of a
thread." I figured you were dismissing pthreads as non-portable due to it
not being natively available on Windows, and accepted that you were only
intere
I don't understand how the memory could be reused since there is no
mechanism that I know of that the runtime library would or could use to
track this. For a dynamically linked C runtime library the allocated memory
is held in the heap that remains after the library unloads, at which time
the poin
Sure, that's a contrived and extreme example, but the best way to illustrate
such a leak. For long-running (24x7) servers that may consist of many
components and subcomponents this scenario can occur. With large enterprise
server applications that are built with processes that value component
re-
ect: Re: SSL_library_init - missing 36 bytes after cleanup
On Nov 15, 2005, at 9:00 PM, Steven Reddie wrote:
> I understand about one-off leaks, but we're talking about a
> dynamically loadable library when we're talking about OpenSSL.
>
> What would happen if an application
unloaded.
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Juran
Sent: Wednesday, 16 November 2005 12:38 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: SSL_library_init - missing 36 bytes after cleanup
On Nov 15, 2005, at 7:29 PM, Steven Reddie
David,
If 36 bytes are being dynamically allocated and not being freed how is it
not a leak?
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Schwartz
Sent: Wednesday, 16 November 2005 10:09 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: SSL_l
Yes, that's right. The initialized flag is local to
the module that it is in and is only set when calling RAND_status and I think
one other function (maybe RAND_get_bytes). If you wish to modify the
OpenSSL code directly you could get rid of the "if (!initialized)" test and rely
only on th
RAND_status will trigger seeding of the PRNG if it has not
been initialised. On Windows the entropy gathering can take a long time
due to the heap walking and performance counter accesses. Whether it
completes in a reasonable time or takes much longer can depend on current system
activity
Hi Dharmesh,
The output hasn't been made to facilitate easy
parsing. A pragmatic approach may be to grep for "done" and "ok" (and
perhaps "fail" and "err") and save the output from a known good run and
compare subsequent runs against that.
Regards,
Steven
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[m
It sounds like a padding issue. Which padding mode are you specifying, what
is the key length, and what is the length of the plaintext? To be clear,
the encrypt succeeds all of the time, but the decrypt fails half of the
time?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PR
Maybe the C files get compiled with the correct compiler,
but you probably don't want that x86cpuid-elf file being compiled for ARM since
it's for x86. You seem to have ended up with an x86 configuration
(probably linux-elf which although it doesn't explicitly state it is in this
case for a
Sure, I'm not discounting the value of being able to do pretty printing. I
was just thinking about using the decoded data further than that, and in all
situations I can think of knowing the data format is important (and a
given). Even with XML, where you could use XPATH/XQUERY to drill down into
I understand you're point. I can imagine some interesting things done with
XSLT.
I guess I just haven't come across a case in practice (other than pretty
printing) where I needed to decode without knowledge of the format of the
data. I also feel that there are worse things done with ASN.1, from
ll use implicit tagging.
- Sravan
Steven Reddie wrote:
>By using explicit tagging the underlying object is encoded as it would
>be if standalone. Implict tagging avoids adding a wrapper around the
>object but results in the underlying object being slightly altered.
>
>As an example,
Is this a concern for real applications, things other than pretty printers
and protocol dumpers? I agree that it makes it difficult to understand the
content without a format description, but it's no worse than some
proprietary encoding. Is translating into XML without knowing the
"language" of t
, Nonce and the requestExtensions
Hi Steven,
I would like to know point 2.
- Sravan
Steven Reddie wrote:
>I'm sure someone will jump in if they see a mismatch in your question
>and my answer. In the meantime let's break it down. Are you:
>1. Looking at some existing data model
help us out...
- Sravan
Steven Reddie wrote:
>I meant to say that I don't know of any specific reason other than not
>changing the underlying type. I imagine that not changing the
>underlying type can be important/helpful in some situations. An
>example being an encoded certifica
erlying object is
still a standalone certificate.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Reddie
Sent: Thursday, 8 September 2005 2:17 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: OCSP, Nonce and the requestExtensions
When working with enco
R' but it
seems i didn't get the exact difference b/n the two types of tags - in the
sense of exact context in which each of these types of tags are used.
bye & thnx
- sravan
Steven Reddie wrote:
>I should clarify that tags aren't blindly used to identify members of
>
I should clarify that tags aren't blindly used to identify members of
structured types, only when there would otherwise be ambiguity such as with
optional members in a SEQUENCE, or in a CHOICE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven R
@openssl.org
Subject: Re: OCSP, Nonce and the requestExtensions
ah, okay. thank you!
now i know what's the number for! :)
Steven Reddie schrieb:
>That's the [2] in:
>
>TBSRequest ::= SEQUENCE {
>version [0] EXPLICIT Version DEFAULT v1,
That's the [2] in:
TBSRequest ::= SEQUENCE {
version [0] EXPLICIT Version DEFAULT v1,
requestorName [1] EXPLICIT GeneralName OPTIONAL,
requestList SEQUENCE OF Request,
requestExtensions [2] EXPLICIT Extensions OPTIONAL }
It's the same as your original problem: different end-of-line markers
Try this instead:
echo -n "1122" | openssl dgst -md5
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roberto Arias Alegria
Sent: Tuesday, 30 August 2005 2:01 PM
To: openssl-user
Your question doesn't make much sense. A "digest of the file" is exactly
the same as "a digest of what is *inside* the file". If you mean that you
want a digest of a particular portion of the contents of the file then
you'll need to extract that yourself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
fact that I am behind a proxy could be the problem?..
I am going to try it using a machine directly conected to the outside..
Thanks,
Rodolfo
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Reddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: MD5SUM openssl-0.9.8.tar
The copy I downloaded a while back is correct. The copy I downloaded just
now is also correct. Seems you have a corrupt download. Does "gunzip -t
openssl-0.9.8.tar.gz" report a corruption?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodolfo Estrada
Which version are you using? 0.9.8 does what I'd expect:
$ openssl ciphers AES+DES
Error in cipher list
3312:error:144020B9:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list:no cipher
match:ssl_lib.c:1167:
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROT
RSA_verify calls RSA_public_decrypt to do the actual decryption. The
padding aspects of each are the same. The difference in PKCS#1 padding is
between RSA_public_encrypt/RSA_private_decrypt and
RSA_private_encrypt/RSA_public_decrypt. The pair used for signatures use a
form of padding that doesn'
The second handshake message in frame 18 (Certificate Request) has an empty
certificate_authorities record (shown as "Distinguished Names Length: 0" in
the dump). TLS v1.0 specifies that this record must contain at least 3
entries:
struct {
ClientCertificateType certificate_type
If you're trying to extract an implementation of SHA-256 by starting with
sha256t.c you're on the wrong track. That file is for testing sha256.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Rintoul
Sent: Monday, 22 August 2005 10:07 PM
To: openss
It probably is 1023 bit, but you can think of that as being 1024 bit with
the top bit zero. Since the modulus is effectively random (the product or
two randomly chosen large primes) then it makes sense that some of the
generated moduli will not completely fill the 1024 bits, just as choosing a
num
I believe it's a matter of efficiency. There are optimisations that can be
performed on the math of integers of length power-of-2. It's possible that
there are implementations out there that won't work with non-standard sizes.
I have seen 4096 bit keys in the wild. In fact, the Microsoft Root
C
I've put up a wcecompat-1.2 which addresses #2.
ARMV4 is the most common ARM architecture available. Microsoft called this
"ARM" in eVC3. Arm defined a Thumb instruction set which is 16-bits to
allow more compact code, with the ability to switch between both modes.
With eVC4 Microsoft renamed "A
INDLL -D_DLL /Foobj/
-D_MSC_VER=1200
SRC = \
src/args.cpp \
On 8/8/05, Steven Reddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I've put a new wcecompat.zip up at essemer.com.au which includes
> ENOMEM and EA
Whoops, I missed the memcpy reference in the original post. I added a
memcpy prototype to string.h in wcecompat 1.1 to satisfy an OpenSSL 0.9.8
compile problem, so I guess this is the one. The problem with the wcecompat
approach is that it overrides/replaces the Microsoft supplied header files.
I
The file "C:\Program Files\Microsoft eMbedded C++
4.0\EVC\wce420\bin\WCEARMV4.BAT" should contain a line like:
if "%WCEROOT%"=="" set WCEROOT=C:\Program Files\Microsoft eMbedded
C++ 4.0
Which is obviously customised on install since the default is "C:\Microsoft
eMbedded C++ 4.0" and I cho
Hi Andy,
The first release wasn't numbered. This new release is numbered 1.1.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Polyakov
Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2005 3:29 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: openssl-0.9.8-stable-SNAP-2005
Hi Michael,
I've put a new wcecompat.zip up at essemer.com.au which includes ENOMEM and
EAGAIN. The remainder of the problems need to be corrected in OpenSSL.
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Wang
Sent: Tuesday,
That error message tends to occur when the code is too complicated for the
compiler. You may be able to avoid the error by rearranging the code in
that module, but it's a hit and miss approach. Upgrading to a newer
compiler should fix the problem (since this builds fine under VC6 and up).
-
That depends on which cipher you're talking about.
The definition reveals that it's a member of a structure named evp_cipher_st
which is typedef'd as EVP_CIPHER. Grep for EVP_CIPHER in evp.h and you'll
see there are a lot of implementations of this structure.
Steven
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
ffer to the hardware.
This should solve my problem. I have a question here..does anyone know
which functions does the do_cipher function pointer point to ?
Cheers
Riaz
On 7/5/05, Steven
Reddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Riaz,
I think
you'll find that malloc does do the ri
mainly for gcc compiler, so this
is a compiler dependent solution. I have to yet check this.
On 7/4/05, Steven
Reddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Riaz, I
think I misread/misunderstood your question. OpenSSL uses malloc to
allocate memory. malloc should return an allocated b
Riaz, I think I misread/misunderstood your question.
OpenSSL uses malloc to allocate memory. malloc should return an allocated
buffer which is aligned appropriately for the underlying platform.
Typically this alignment will be greater than you require, such as to a 16-byte
boundary.
Fro
Isn't this the job of the compiler?
I don't believe that OpenSSL goes out of it's way to access
values larger than 8-bits on unaligned addresses. One exception is the
hand-optimised crypto routines, such as AES, where 32-bit values may be accessed
on arbitrary addresses. Check out the mac
You said it crashes when you call OpenSSL? Which function are you calling,
and what sort of crash is it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Qadeer Baig
Sent: Tuesday, 7 June 2005 2:53 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: MSVC Applic
Adding to David's response...
MSG_PEEK is problematic on some systems. On Windows for example (maybe only
the 9x series, but a problem none-the-less) using MSG_PEEK will effectively
freeze the contents of the buffered data that can be seen with MSG_PEEK,
meaning that any further peeks will not be
Ken, think of it this way:
1. To send a message for only a specific person to read you want to make it
decryptable with their private key, thus encrypting with their public key.
2. For a signature, the world needs to be able to verify it, so it needs to
be decryptable with the public key, and thus
:-O
It may have been helpful if you didn't already have a copy. I'm guessing
that Mike didn't have intimate knowledge of the content of your bookshelf.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
Sent: Friday, 22 April 2005 2:24 AM
To: openssl-us
users@openssl.org'
Subject: RE: OpenSSL 0.9.7f released
Announcement. Is there any other place to provide more information?
Thanks,
Sharon Zhao
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Reddie
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 6:21 PM
T
Where have you looked?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zhao Sharon-CSC002
Sent: Thursday, 24 March 2005 2:54 AM
To: 'openssl-users@openssl.org'
Subject: RE: OpenSSL 0.9.7f released
Where I can find the release notes of 0.9.7f?
Thanks,
S
Thomas,
I view GetSystemTimeAsFileTime as a Win32 API function that has been left
out of Windows CE. It's still part of the Windows platform though, and
wcecompat is about providing the parts of the Windows platform left out of
Windows CE. I'm not sure how the accreditation could specifically di
Hi Oscar,
The released wcecompat only works with Windows CE SDK's up to Pocket PC 2002
(eVC3). I am yet to release eVC4 support -- just haven't found time to do
so. If you want to make your own local changes you should find that they
are quite minor -- the changes that I am yet to release includ
Yes, these errors are during the link stage. Your libcrypto.a should
contain the file des_enc.o which should contain DES_encrypt1. If you can't
find that symbols then something has gone wrong with your build. I don't
think LD_LIBRARY_PATH has any effect on Cygwin, but I'm not positive -- I
think
Under SSL there are two possible client modes, anonymous and authenticated.
You're referring to anonymous connections where the client doesn't provide
any credentials to the server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David ARMOUR
Sent: Thursda
set other environment variables besides of the PATH variable?
TIA,
Michael
Steven Reddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 20.10.2004, 16:22:16:
> The sys directory refered to is under the system include directory,
> probably /usr/include/sys. Do you have a /usr/include/sys/time.h? If
The sys directory refered to is under the system include directory, probably
/usr/include/sys. Do you have a /usr/include/sys/time.h? If not, you may
need to reinstall gcc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
Roberto Gallo wrote:
Hi,
We are developing a new hardware device based on Atmels ARM based
processors. However, RSA sign times for 1024 bits are critical -
ideally it should spend less than 3 seconds.
I have two questions: does anyone have any performance figure of
OpenSSL's RSA or DH implement
Hi Antonio,
A patch for this has been submitted and I'll work it into a larger set of
changes for supporting newer WCE SDKs. To fix the problem that you're
having right now take a look at the source code at the locations listed
below and make sure that the closing ')' is included. You'll see tha
NULL,NULL,NULL)). I am sure that "file"
is valid.
My program can execute the function
RSA_generate_key(512,RSA_F4,NULL,NULL) without any problem.
The Type fo my VC++ project is MFC AppWizard(dll).
The type of my VB project is "EXE STANDARD" .
Steven
Title: Message
Have
you traced through with a debuuger? Where does it
crash?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Saladine HachemSent: Tuesday, 20 April 2004 7:40
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Any body doesn't
want to hel
Title: Message
Hi
Steve,
I take
it that dynamically linking the FIPS OpenSSL into an executable means that the
FIPS certification is void for that application. So as you have stated,
static linking is required. However, if I'm producing
a security library that uses OpenSSL and I statica
t
-rw-r--r--1 redst01 None 103 Mar 19 17:42 index.txt
drwxr-xr-x+ 2 redst01 None0 Mar 19 17:42 .
c:/cygwin/home/redst01/dev/obj/winnt/debug_build/openssl/bin/openssl ocsp
-issuer ca1_cert.pem -cert ca1_ee1_cert.pem -reqout ca1_ee1_req_unsigned.der
-no_nonce
c:/cygwin/
own /C=US/O=Root/OU=CA1
V 050319032215Z 02 unknown /C=US/O=Root/OU=CA1/CN=ee1
V 050319032218Z 03 unknown /C=US/O=Root/OU=CA1/CN=ee2
Regards,
Steven Reddie
Manager, Development - eTrust R&D
Computer Associates (Australia)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +
Title: Message
Hi
Richard,
I'm confused by
changes to the "openssl ca" command changes in 0.9.7d that now spit out several
CA index files. Previously we got a single index.txt files, but now are
seeing also index.txt.attr, index.txt.attr.new, index.txt.attr.old, and
index.txt.new.
We h
You mean DER which is a subset of BER. The OpenSSL i2d_* functions convert
from OpenSSL's internal representation into DER. Load with the PEM routines
and i2d the resulting X509 object.
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Su
Title: Message
Sorry,
spoke too soon. Not noticing the scrollbar, my window size made the
message look like it ended after the "wheels fall off" section.
doh!
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steven ReddieSent: Wednesday, 1
Title: Message
Elaborating on "wheels fall off" might make the problem easier to
diagnose. If X509_NAME is mentioned then it's probably a clash with the
Microsoft Platform SDK. With VC6 the Platform SDK was a seperate optional
package and it was simply a matter of removing the Platform SDK
Brian,
Please refrain from sending the same message four times in a row. It
doesn't get you an answer any faster.
The openssl enc command by default adds a salt to the start of the message
to be encrypted and removes it on decryption. This salt is of the form
"Salted__" followed by some binary
Your libcrypto has been built with gcc so you need to link your application
against the gcc runtime library. Either use gcc to invoke the linker, or
link against the library printed when you run "gcc -print-libgcc-file-name".
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[m
It seems that you do have an INCLUDE variable set by WCEARM.BAT, so you
shouldn't been to tweak it yourself. The value is:
INCLUDE=C:\Windows CE Tools\WCE300\ms pocket pc\include;
C:\Windows CE Tools\WCE300\ms pocket pc\MFC\include;
C:\Windows CE Tools\W
Title: Message
The
code listed in the error below shouldn't be compiled for WINCE due to the #ifdef
at the top of that module. What has most likely happened is that
OPENSSL_SYS_WINCE is not being defined. I haven't tried building OpenSSL
on WINCE since 0.9.7 or 0.9.7a but it doesn't look l
Title: Message
The
first instruction listed in OpenSSL's INSTALL.WCE file, executing eVC's
WCEARM.BAT file (or similar), should result in setting the INCLUDE environment
variable. Have you run that command? If so, can you open a fresh
command prompt window, execute the following commands,
There should be a windows.h in your PPC SDK include directory. Has the
INCLUDE environment variable been set properly?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mahabhashyam Anupama
Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2003 6:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sub
eVC is a free download from Microsoft that runs on the desktop as a
cross-compiler. Take a look at the developer FAQ's and articles on
Microsoft's www.pocketpc.com site.
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mahabhashyam Anupam
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr. Stephen Henson
Sent: Monday, 17 November 2003 11:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ordering of components of subject/issuer DN
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003, Steven Reddie wrote:
>
> I have come across a
Title: Message
Hi
all,
I have come across a
certificate that chokes our software which uses OpenSSL. I haven't dug
very deep yet, but was hoping that someone could tell me about any ordering
rules for the DN's.
openssl asn1parse on
the cert produces the dump below which has the order o
I presume that you're trying the Pocket PC 2003 SDK. I haven't upgraded to
that myself but I've just checked the header files and Microsoft do now
include a time.h that includes a struct tm. Wcecompat will need work which
I don't currently have time for. If you wish to contribute patches I can
i
Title: Message
You
are trying to run the openssl.exe built for the Pocket PC. It wont run on
the desktop. You would probably be better off using a desktop build of
openssl, creating the certificates with that, and transferring them to the
PPC. If you really want to use the PPC version, ge
Title: Message
Hi,
the pthread.h and unistd.h headers included by your project aren't available
under Windows CE. The unresolved symbols would appear to indicate that you
haven't included the built OpenSSL libraries when linking your
application. The WinMainCRTStartup unresolved symbol mea
Title: Message
The
code for using OpenSSL on the Pocket PC should be the same as the code for using
it on other platforms. Try the openssl apps directory for examples of how
to use various OpenSSL features.
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt
Are you clicking on it on the iPAQ? If so, it wont work since it is a
console based program and CE doesn't support consoles. I was sure I
included details in INSTALL.WCE about how to run it via your desktop, but I
don't seem them there so I must be mistaken. If you grab the ceutils from
my websi
Have you used the following functions to register OpenSSL thread-safety
callbacks:
CRYPTO_set_locking_callback(locking_function);
CRYPTO_set_id_callback(id_function);
You need to supply your own locking_function() and id_function(), samples of
which can be found in OpenSSL's mt/mt
Title: Message
Yes,
the XScale is an ARM v5.
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kambourakis GeorgiosSent: Wednesday, 24 September
2003 6:15 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: ARM
and Xscale processor
Hi,
Yeah, I get the same. I've added this user to my spam list.
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aleix Conchillo
Flaque
Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2003 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: more spam
hi,
i have sent a message t
Title: RE: ASN.1 Question...
I
can't think of anything myself, but it should only take a programmer a few
minutes to write one.
-Original Message-From: Daniel Gómez
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Daniel
GómezSent: Thursday, 10 July 2003 12:24 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]S
That command will work if the data is stored as binary in the file. Is the
data below the way it is stored in the file, as the characters "308201"...?
If so, you will need to convert this to binary yourself and then use the
command below.
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
RSA does take a lot of time compared to, say, DES, but they're used for
completely different things. To understand the difference you should read a
book such as Applied Cryptography by Bruce Schneier, or a better place to
start might be the RSA Crypto FAQ at
http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/faq/
I don't think anyone on this list is going to be able to tell you if you
have enough memory. Unless you can provide more information such as how
long it is taking you are not likely to get any help. That function can
take considerable time to complete and of course it will depend on the speed
of
rds,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steven Reddie
Sent: Friday, 20 June 2003 12:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: openssl for windows ce "tchar" problem
Can you give me an example of an OpenSSL function that uses a c
Can you give me an example of an OpenSSL function that uses a char type
where you expect to be able to use a TCHAR type?
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Antonio d'Errico
Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 7:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
For
ASN.1, start with "A Layman's Guide to a Subset of ASN.1, BER, and DER".
You will find a copy at http://security.polito.it/asn1/layman.pdf.
A search on google for "distinguished name" should return you some useful
information.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma
mewhere has developed software that interacts directly with
the layer 3 protocol datagrams themselves, this information should be
available.
Thanks,
DCL
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 17:25, Steven Reddie wrote:
> The fourth result returned by google.com for "SSL" is the "SSL 3.0
> Specifica
The only way I know of to solve this problem is to use non-blocking sockets,
create a second socket pair to deliver the terminate message, and select()
on the SSL socket and the terminate socket. When thread#2 wants to
terminate thread#1 it sends a message down the terminate socket which causes
th
I haven't been following this thread. While there may be people on this
list who highly value the documents that you've posted please remember that
there are probably thousands of people on this list, and many of them don't
know anything of, or care about, pcAnywhere. Posting only the link would
Thanks Atul, I'll incorporate this into the next wcecompat release.
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atul Prakash
Sent: Monday, 23 December 2002 6:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Openssl-0.9.7-beta6/wcecompat on Pocket PC 2002 -
The problem is that you've run nmake from the VC++ bin directory. Change to
the c:\openssl-0.9.6g\directory and execute "nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak" from
there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 7 December 2002 8
It was added in 0.9.7 beta 4. beta 5 will be out shortly and fixes a few
build issues.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bala Kanagasabai
Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2002 5:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SSL in windows CE
Can anyone te
That's odd. stdio_extras.h is only included if OPENSSL_SYS_WINCE is defined
which is only defined if OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WINCE is defined which should only
be defined if you ran "perl Configure VC-CE". Do you have any idea how
stdio_extras.h is being included when it's wrapped with an "#ifdef
OPENSSL
That file is only used for the Windows CE build. Are you building for
Windows CE?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desmond Ling
Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2002 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to make in Visual C++ 6.0
hi,
s
Do you have an INCLUDE environment variable set with a path that includes
the directory where your stdio.h lives?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Desmond Ling
Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2002 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Visual
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
