I am beginner.
I have linux Red Hat 6.1, apache 1.3.12,
mod_ssl, openssl 0.9.5.
I generated self signed certificate (for
intranet use only). When I connect to my www server with browser (IE 5.0 cipher
strength 56bit) it connect with 56bit SSL. It is OK. But when I connect to
some commercial
<<...>>
Darren Weatherall
QA Analyst
Office: (416) 226-2900 x3301
Cell: (416) 706-9291
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List
> From: "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> davids> > TLS doesn't support name-based virtual servers either.
> davids>
> davids> Someone needs to yell at the TLS working group! A
> davids> chance to 'automatically' add support for name-based virtual
> davids> hosts to all protocols lay
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> This is why upgrading to TLS within the original protocol is a better
> idea, as stated in RFC2817, among others. After all, it wouldn't be
> that difficult to write a small routine library that deals with this
> kind of upgrade, or so I imagine...
Exactly
> What is mod_ssl anyway, the string "mod_ssl" does not exist in the
> whole of OpenSSL and only once in OpenLDAP 2.0.6 as a FIXME?
cf. http://www.modssl.org
mod_ssl is an SSL extension to Apache that uses OpenSSL.
__
OpenSSL P
From: "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
davids> > TLS doesn't support name-based virtual servers either.
davids>
davids> Someone needs to yell at the TLS working group! A
davids> chance to 'automatically' add support for name-based virtual
davids> hosts to all protocols layered on top
Hi
I'm waiting on IBM for a detailed report.
The site is protected by a firewall so that's why
you can't test it.
best regards
Carsten
- Original Message -
From: "Dr S N Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2000 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: Header size
Carsten Rhod Gregersen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Formerly I posted a report concerning connection test with
> client authorisation against a IBM payment gateway.
>
> You requested that I tried with the openssl program again
> but with debug turned on.
>
> I've done that and now I'm experiencing every
> TLS doesn't support name-based virtual servers either.
Someone needs to yell at the TLS working group! A chance to 'automatically'
add support for name-based virtual hosts to all protocols layered on top of
TLS is too good to give up. It would take decades to add that support to
each p
> I am not sure how relevant this is, but I am using SSL on MSIE 5.5 on a MS IIS
>server with an
> OpenSSL certificate installed and it works OK.
The SSL v3 problems seem to have been fixed in IE 5.5 . That is, we have not seen
anything
obviously broken. it's the 5.0 versions and earlier that
I am not sure how relevant this is, but I am using SSL on MSIE
5.5 on a MS IIS server with an OpenSSL certificate installed and it works
OK.
I have been trying the get MS Outlook Express 5 to work with
SSL and it just crashes. I can't find any LDAP client apart from OpenLDAP
ones that wil
After much trial-and-error, and after trying all the fixes we could find it appears that a range of IE 4.x and 5.0 browsers simply will not work reliably with mod_ssl built on OpenSSL > 0.9.4 when allowed to negotiate any kind of SSL v3.
FYI, our current secure servers are built as follows:
Open
12 matches
Mail list logo
