> TLS doesn't support name-based virtual servers either. Someone needs to yell at the TLS working group! A chance to 'automatically' add support for name-based virtual hosts to all protocols layered on top of TLS is too good to give up. It would take decades to add that support to each protocol individually. DS PS: And while you're yelling at them, mention compression. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Amol Natu
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Vadim Fedukovich
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Michael T. Babcock
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3... Edwin Chiu
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x David Lang
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Norman Mackey
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Vadim Fedukovich
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3... Michael T. Babcock
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x David Lang
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3... Eric Rescorla
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache... David Schwartz
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Ap... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost ... Michael T. Babcock
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost ... David Schwartz
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Paulo Matos
- RE: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3.x Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache 1.3... tomn
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache... Paulo Matos
- Re: SSL + VirtualHost in Apache... Michael T. Babcock