I believe that all but one of the submissions we got (either internal
or open source) have been pulled into viewer-development.
The one exception is a submission from Aleric that only affects
develop.py - I had a build failure yesterday the first time I tested it
on the build farm, so I skipp
Oz,
Please clarify the vwr-x process.
As a example. I built and tested vwr-20879 the issue Robin wrote up concerning
Express builds.
She had a six or so additional vwr-x issues that contributed to a solution.
I added a change set that improved one aspect of the six or so. I pushed thes
On 2010-08-30 12:42, Nicky Perian wrote:
Oz,
Please clarify the vwr-x process.
As a example. I built and tested vwr-20879 the issue Robin wrote up
concerning Express builds.
She had a six or so additional vwr-x issues that contributed to a
solution. I added a change set that improv
And estate owners already took a huge beating over homesteads. We can't
afford another hit by having homesteads be able to be directly leased by
everyone.
I have HUGE sympathy for the original poster. I have eaten fees, given
free tier and so on to people left in a world of hurt by such actions
*cough* If the point of this is to make people *want* 2.x a lot of
nice tags that say 'to see me properly, use viewer 2.x... I have more
attachments than you do' might be a good way to go. *cough* Ok, a bit
snarky, but seriously, if we HIDE the COOL stuff, where's the fire to
get people ov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/30/2010 1:39 PM, Suz Dollar wrote:
> If the point of this is to make people *want* 2.x a lot of
> nice tags that say 'to see me properly, use viewer 2.x... I have more
> attachments than you do' might be a good way to go.
It worked for Emer
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:44:04 -0700
Kadah wrote:
> > If the point of this is to make people *want* 2.x a lot of
> > nice tags that say 'to see me properly, use viewer 2.x... I have
> > more attachments than you do' might be a good way to go.
>
> It worked for Emerald.
Emerald use a "tweaked
The way emerald works and others is no good solution couse as you sayd you
can only see it with those viewers AND it dosent even work for hud objects,
how viewer 2 works now is it do works accross all viewers AND it works for
hud objects
and as for the radar thing, Kristens viewer already added
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:15:17 +0200
"Alexandrea Fride" wrote:
> The way emerald works and others is no good solution couse as you
> sayd you can only see it with those viewers AND it dosent even work
> for hud objects,
>
> how viewer 2 works now is it do works accross all viewers AND it
> works f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/30/2010 2:04 PM, Altair Sythos Memo wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:44:04 -0700
> Kadah wrote:
>
>>> If the point of this is to make people *want* 2.x a lot of
>>> nice tags that say 'to see me properly, use viewer 2.x... I have
>>> more at
On 8/30/2010 3:04 PM, Altair Sythos Memo wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:44:04 -0700
> Kadah wrote:
>
>>> If the point of this is to make people *want* 2.x a lot of
>>> nice tags that say 'to see me properly, use viewer 2.x... I have
>>> more attachments than you do' might be a good way to g
On 8/30/2010 19:38, David Couchenour wrote
> Someone can edit and add the additional attachment points to the
> avatar_lad.xml file for the other viewer(s). I've done this for the
> 2.1.2 viewer and it seems to work. Note that you can't simply copy the
> avatar_lad.xml from Emerald to 2.x.
>
> Th
12 matches
Mail list logo
