On 04/07/07, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
> > On 04/07/07, Andrew Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I know you may think it is a silly question, but I am unable to find the
> >> answer.
> >> OK! We know Sun SPARC chips all run 64 bit OpenSolaris, but which AMD
FYI
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=25601&tstart=0
pcotten
Posts: 13
From: EGO02
Registered: 6/22/06
ReadRe: Re: BrandZ, Xen and Chime for Solaris 10 U3 ?
Posted: Jun 22, 2007 10:26 PM in response to: ghreyes in response to: ghreyes
C
1) Did ZFS root system make it in to Solaris 10 Update 4?
2) When is the date this can be downloaded from sun.com?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 04/07/07, Andrew Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I know you may think it is a silly question, but I am unable to find the
>> answer.
>> OK! We know Sun SPARC chips all run 64 bit OpenSolaris, but which AMD and
>> Intel cpu can run it as well:
>>
>> - AMD Opteron ru
Yo uso el intel Core 2 Due en una placa Intel D975XBXZ y corre bien el
opensolaris ahi, con un disco sata de 200 GB.
saludos
Miguel
2007/7/4, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 04/07/07, Andrew Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know you may think it is a silly question, but I am unable
On 04/07/07, Andrew Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know you may think it is a silly question, but I am unable to find the
> answer.
> OK! We know Sun SPARC chips all run 64 bit OpenSolaris, but which AMD and
> Intel cpu can run it as well:
>
> - AMD Opteron run 64bit kernel
> - Intel Xe
I know you may think it is a silly question, but I am unable to find the answer.
OK! We know Sun SPARC chips all run 64 bit OpenSolaris, but which AMD and Intel
cpu can run it as well:
- AMD Opteron run 64bit kernel
- Intel Xeon run 64bit kernel
but what about:
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core
Unfortunately I had tried this, was trying to boot from the DVD and found the
Failsafe image in Grub. fsck'd with it mounted and with it not mounted, no
difference.
Just for laughs I tried once again without luck.
I'll reinstall and leave some extra space for the rounding errors (as well as
k
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 19:01 +0100, a b wrote:
> I might be an old-fashioned gray-beard candidate, but some things that
> we're still nurturing in UNIX tradition really are obsolete and need
> to be axed. This is one of those.
There's a number of reasons to chop up a single-disk machine into
multip
> The same thing is still taught in the GNU/Linux and *BSD worlds as> well. I
> don't think I've ever read a administrator manual that hasn't> suggested
> placing certain directories on different filesystems,> especially those that
> contain the mail spool.
IRIX 6.5 had/has only one FS (XFS), /
Thanks very much! I will try that procedure.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello all,
I'm trying to use sc 3.2, but the solaris 10 installation is u2... so i did a
install(twice)of one server. The both servers boot from SAN (qlogic 2340), and
with sol 10 u2 everything works just fine! But now with u3, after the
installation (full+OEM), the system does not boot.
I di
On 04/07/07, a b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thomas may have chosen the installer's defaults. Unfortunately, the
> > installer defaults to a root slice with just barely enough space to
> > install the default package cluster plus a small percentage of overhead
> > and a huge /export/home parti
Dear all:
I've finished building the ON b66.
I follow the guidance of "Building and Installing OpenSolaris".
Now I need to install the ON, but I'm puzzled by this paragraph:
"On X86 there's one more task we must perform before booting our new
kernel: once the tar ball has been extraced, we must
Boot back up onto the DVD of snv_67 and open a command window after the
language or boot up onto Solaris failesafe and do not mount the root if you do
unmount it i.e umount /a, then run fsck the device path is needed i.e:
fsck -F ufs -o b=32 /dev/rdsk/c1d0s0
If you keep having issues, reinstall
> Thomas may have chosen the installer's defaults. Unfortunately, the
> installer defaults to a root slice with just barely enough space to
> install the default package cluster plus a small percentage of overhead
> and a huge /export/home partition. This might make sense for huge
> servers wh
Some more info.
During fsck, I receive the error:
EXCESSIVE DUPLICATE INODE
CONTINUE?
This happens a few times, I type "yes" at the CONTINUE prompt. After some time
it goes into PHASE 1b to "Rescan for More DUPS".
This is when I receive the "BAD STATE 0x52 TO BLKERR" error.
The wonderful Int
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Hi,
>>although I really like Opensolaris I find really hideous having the
>>terminal spit out control sequences
>>when hitting arrow keys and backspace instead of moving the cursor
>>(the only extra key that works correctly is Del, and it works backwards
>>
>>
>
>
>I
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> although I really like Opensolaris I find really hideous having the
>> terminal spit out control sequences
>> when hitting arrow keys and backspace instead of moving the cursor
>> (the only extra key that works correctly is Del, and it works
On 7/4/07, Nico Sabbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> although I really like Opensolaris I find really hideous having the
> terminal spit out control sequences
> when hitting arrow keys and backspace instead of moving the cursor
> (the only extra key that works correctly is Del, and it works bac
>Hi,
>although I really like Opensolaris I find really hideous having the
>terminal spit out control sequences
>when hitting arrow keys and backspace instead of moving the cursor
>(the only extra key that works correctly is Del, and it works backwards
Is this with GNOME Terminal? You can set th
Hi,
although I really like Opensolaris I find really hideous having the
terminal spit out control sequences
when hitting arrow keys and backspace instead of moving the cursor
(the only extra key that works correctly is Del, and it works backwards
(like backspace)).
It's not only hideous, but a se
Thomas may have chosen the installer's defaults. Unfortunately, the
installer defaults to a root slice with just barely enough space to
install the default package cluster plus a small percentage of overhead
and a huge /export/home partition. This might make sense for huge
servers where root mi
Donal McMullan wrote:
> David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>> If you build a community that's based primarily on valuing people
>> skills, you'll get a very different one than if you built it based
>> primarily on technical skills.
>
> If you give people license to be disrespectful to their peers on the
I am new to solaris and trying to install solaris 10 on 64 bit machine the
process of installing goes perfectly smooth till the first reboot i ejected the
first CD
but the GNU-GRUB never showed up and getting some error link
Boot path:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2/[EMAIL PROTECTED
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> If you build a community that's based primarily on valuing people
> skills, you'll get a very different one than if you built it based
> primarily on technical skills.
If you give people license to be disrespectful to their peers on the
basis of their self-perceived t
David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Jim Grisanzio wrote:
>> Look, I know many scary-smart developers who are as strange as anything
>> you can describe. However, I only have relationships with and respect
>> those who treat me and others with respect. It's that simple, really.
>> All the too-cool open so
27 matches
Mail list logo
