>The most pathetic one I've seen is complaints about the
>choice-of-venue clause where some people believe the author of the
>software apparently deserves less protection than the user even though
>the author is the one that created the valuable item they're using in
>the first place.
Another mis
Hi everyone,
Has anyone faced this issue before where we are trying to jumpstart V210
using a Solaris image.
Everything goes well but and after the jumpstart when server tries to
boot then we get the following error message:
Cannot mount root on /pseudo/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0;10,blk
thanks For all..!
i dont know which is the username ...
i ve succesfully logged in using
usename: root
pass :***
thank u very much for the helppp.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensola
The specific commercial use prevented would be modification of the source
without redistribution.
Anyway, I received a reply from Theo: here it is, in all its glory. (Carated
text mine)
> ...They were hoping to have the sup
> hi to all,,
>
> Im getting problem while logging in. ,,... i given
> root password and workgroup name while installing
> ...when promted to enter username and password
> ...nothing matching please help...which usename
> and password i have to give ...? :(
>
> installed 2-3 timesim
Hi Wences and Leal - and everyone else getting this - I thought I should
reply to all and get this one on the record in case someone else comes
across the same problem.
_THE_ place to go for OpenSolaris information in Brazil is
br.opensolaris.org. It is being translated and already has some up
Howdy Leal!
If I can help please let me know, except I live in the US, I run the
Dallas Fort Worth OpenSolaris Users Group and could share with you what
we are doing if you want to know you can check out
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/os_user_groups/dfw-osug/. My
wife is a "Gaucha"
If this is Solaris not windows correct, "given root password and workgroup name"
1. boot up the DVD or CD install and you can answer language prompt and the gui
will start, then select the next region question, then the right click menu
will be active, and you can bring up a terminal window, you
Young Joo Pintaske wrote:
Hi Jim,
G11n has received a few contributions lately, and I'll send the
details out later as well.
via request-sponsor?
Actually the email request came to i18n-discuss. I just sent an email
about that to the request-sponsor alias:
http://www.opensolaris.org/j
Great news!
Thanks for the info Alan...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
msl wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to find a local (Brazilian) Opensolaris Community/Group, but
without luck.
The google search about that topic, gives me results like:
http://www.opensolaris-br.org (That is a shame). I'm a Solaris/POSIX big fan,
and ALL this project (OpenSolaris) is great accom
Joe Gilmore wrote:
> Does raid-z require identical disks?
>
>
No.
There is a wealth of information on ZFS over on ZFS-discuss.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 12/06/07, Bruno Jargot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it is better to create a mailing list @opensolaris NOW than
>> waiting for a road map from Sun management to create a commission
>> which may decide that mailing list may be desirable in the distant
>> future
>
>
On 12/06/07, Brendan O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, it's my understanding that the OpenBSD folk want to have as many
people using their code as possible, so they need as-free-as-possible
code. Copyleft locks down certain commercial uses of it, so it doesn't
support that goal; it's more
Well, it's my understanding that the OpenBSD folk want to have as many
people using their code as possible, so they need as-free-as-possible
code. Copyleft locks down certain commercial uses of it, so it doesn't
support that goal; it's more than mere handwaving to them, it's part of
their philo
Hello,
I'm trying to find a local (Brazilian) Opensolaris Community/Group, but
without luck.
The google search about that topic, gives me results like:
http://www.opensolaris-br.org (That is a shame). I'm a Solaris/POSIX big fan,
and ALL this project (OpenSolaris) is great accomplishment for
On 12/06/07, Dev Mazumdar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 12/06/07, Brendan O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It doesn't appear that OpenBSD's problem is political in nature.
>>
>> http://openbsd.org/policy.html
>>
>> The important section to this discussion would be the
Does raid-z require identical disks?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
UNIX admin wrote:
Not yet the idea is likely to create a new
packaging system
but leave the existing one in place for legacy
applications/packages.
We're working on requirements, etc.
Where do I join? Packaging is something very important and dear to me.
We're going to put a project pr
> Not yet the idea is likely to create a new
> packaging system
> but leave the existing one in place for legacy
> applications/packages.
>
> We're working on requirements, etc.
Where do I join? Packaging is something very important and dear to me.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 12/06/07, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not yet the idea is likely to create a new packaging system
but leave the existing one in place for legacy applications/packages.
We're working on requirements, etc.
It'd be great to see that discussion happen on t
On 12/06/07, Brendan O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It doesn't appear that OpenBSD's problem is political in nature.
http://openbsd.org/policy.html
The important section to this discussion would be the one on the GPL and
copyleft; they don't like it. They would be willing to consider it fo
+1000
On 6/11/07, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> William James wrote:
> > No one from Sun's compiler team did bother to respond to my emails.
> > They may not care about good customer support but I do. I think the
> > best way is now to move forward and create
On 12/06/07, Bruno Jargot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it is better to create a mailing list @opensolaris NOW than
waiting for a road map from Sun management to create a commission
which may decide that mailing list may be desirable in the distant
future
This site is really about OpenSola
On 12/06/07, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not yet the idea is likely to create a new packaging system
but leave the existing one in place for legacy applications/packages.
We're working on requirements, etc.
It'd be great to see that discussion happen on the install or other
a
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
On 6/12/07, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
>> Regarding the former, I see no reason not to include valgrind in
>> the Solaris multiverse, once the new packaging system kicks in.
>
> Which new packaging system?
>
Several of us are active
I think it is better to create a mailing list @opensolaris NOW than
waiting for a road map from Sun management to create a commission
which may decide that mailing list may be desirable in the distant
future
On 6/11/07, Kuldip Oberoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, the answer, historically, is
On 6/12/07, Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
>> Regarding the former, I see no reason not to include valgrind in
>> the Solaris multiverse, once the new packaging system kicks in.
>
> Which new packaging system?
>
Several of us are actively discussing a new packaging s
It doesn't appear that OpenBSD's problem is political in nature.
http://openbsd.org/policy.html
The important section to this discussion would be the one on the GPL and
copyleft; they don't like it. They would be willing to consider it for
non-core things as long as it's separable-- so that Op
This month's FROSUG (Front Range OpenSolaris User Group) meeting is on
Thursday, June 28, 2007. Bonnie Corwin will give an OpenSolaris Engineering
Update. In addition, we will be celebrating the 2-year OpenSolaris anniversary!
!! FREE OpenSolaris Starter Kits and Solaris Express Developer Edition
Hi Jim,
G11n has received a few contributions lately, and I'll send the
details out later as well.
via request-sponsor?
Actually the email request came to i18n-discuss. I just sent an email
about that to the request-sponsor alias:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=3278
UNIX admin wrote:
Regarding the former, I see no reason not to include valgrind in
the Solaris multiverse, once the new packaging system kicks in.
Which new packaging system?
Several of us are actively discussing a new packaging system
for Solaris... we're still figuring out the shape of t
> Agreed and the sooner we start thinking about what we want to monitor
> and how the sooner we can define the namespace. If you have any
> ideas, I would like to hear them.
For the "how" part, why not simply use SNMP. Sensor monitoring is included in
net-snmp 5.4.1 (and other versions). It c
Has anyone found out if it is possible to have an LDAP created user account
login to a mobile device (laptop) that is not connected to the network. We are
using DSEE6.0.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
It's true...
http://www.blastwave.org/docs/step-065.html
But under Nexenta I got down in the text mode and I don't know how swiths
manual entire slises size...
format> ???
fdisk> ?
I instll Belenix and I see from them this sizes me need.
Only now it's need entrie to format> how key this to sl
[Once again cc'ing desktop-discuss, since having these conversations
on opensolaris-discuss is talking behind their backs and not going
to have any results at all.]
Ché Kristo wrote:
I agree with loomy. We should not just push Java for the sake of Java. I
haven't used Jpedal but does does it
it's nice. Could you post your configure options for Qt 4.3.0 ?? ...
In case this helps, I'm working on maintaining a "clearinghouse" of
published OpenSolaris freeware (F/OSS) porting data, aka build recipes:
http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/BuildRecipesReference
Case in point: The build
hi to all,,
Im getting problem while logging in. ,,... i given root password and workgroup
name while installing ...when promted to enter username and password
...nothing matching please help...which usename and password i have to give
...? :(
installed 2-3 timesim not getting an
Hello all,
Please put me back on the straight and narrow if i'm going off on one, but does
anyone else think it's odd that in.mapthd logs messages such as
"[ID 122137 daemon.error] Improved failure detection time 2500 ms".
or
"[ID 299542 daemon.error] NIC repair detected on hme0 of group product
Gary Gendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > gcc isn't even ABI compatible with itself between versions sometimes,
> > so its rather difficult to expect that from others. The whole C++ ABI
> > issue is a big sore point among gcc users/developers :(
> >
> Does it make sense to have a "re-mangler" pr
This is great!
Hopefully this will bring back people in the Linux camp who have shifted to
ALSA; which has all the marks of a proprietary solution except it's under the
GPL ;)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >On 11/06/07, Dev Mazumdar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> After much deliberation - we're going with CDDL for BSD. I don't know why
> >> OpenBSD can't work wit
> h CDDL since FreeBSD and NetBSD can.
> >>
> >
> >The only complaint I've ever seen is about header files
UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > roved gcc front-end compatibility in Sun Studio 12,
> > but no g++ ABI
> > compatibility as of yet. gcc/cc (c compiler) is ABI
> > compatible.
>
> ...Meaning I can freely link .o files compiled with `cc` and `gcc`?
For .o files from C sources: yes, but n
>I'd have thought that would imply a one to one mapping between the ABIs,
>which probably isn't the case. Might be worth a look though.
If it was just name mangling, then it wouldn't be all that difficult
to fix; but it's all the implementation details of class layouts, virtual
functions, etc,
Gary Gendel wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>
>> On 11/06/07, Gary Gendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Casper,
>>>
>>> As always, I learned something important from your replies. It seems
>>> that a number of others didn't know about the dbx run time checker
>>> either.
>>>
>>> I work for
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Gary Gendel wrote:
>> I work for an extremely Linux-centric company. Believe it or not,
>> when I mentioned that Sun's Compiler is available on Linux to the
>> CTO, he was ecstatic. However, how do you convince the third-party
>> vendors to supply their libraries for this?
Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 11/06/07, Gary Gendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Casper,
>>
>> As always, I learned something important from your replies. It seems
>> that a number of others didn't know about the dbx run time checker
>> either.
>>
>> I work for an extremely Linux-centric company. Belie
UNIX admin wrote:
>> roved gcc front-end compatibility in Sun Studio 12,
>> but no g++ ABI
>> compatibility as of yet. gcc/cc (c compiler) is ABI
>> compatible.
>>
>
> ...Meaning I can freely link .o files compiled with `cc` and `gcc`?
>
>
If you couldn't, you wouldn't be able to run gcc
> "The Best" desktop is not the same thing as the "As
> Much Java As Possible" desktop. While an all-java
> desktop would be a neat novelty, that is apparently
> not what JDS currently strives for.
totally agreed.
Anyway I would expect that JDS designers put some added values to the Gnome
Desk
Young Joo Pintaske wrote:
Hi Jim,
Good idea!
I'd like to add that G11n has open sourced several translated documentation
starting 1/18/07. Available docs and the languages are found in our
Documentation Download Center:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/g11n/downloads/docs/current/
cool. thanks.
G
I agree with loomy. We should not just push Java for the sake of Java. I
haven't used Jpedal but does does it offer any functional benefit over Evince?
Does ThinkFree have all the functionality of OpenOffice (Last time I used it it
did not)?
Personally I think putting JDS under the Java umbrell
>> roved gcc front-end compatibility in Sun Studio 12,
>> but no g++ ABI
>> compatibility as of yet. gcc/cc (c compiler) is ABI
>> compatible.
>
>...Meaning I can freely link .o files compiled with `cc` and `gcc`?
>
Yes, to a point (you may need to link against both our C runtime
and gcc's)
>On 11/06/07, Dev Mazumdar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> After much deliberation - we're going with CDDL for BSD. I don't know why
>> OpenBSD can't work wit
h CDDL since FreeBSD and NetBSD can.
>>
>
>The only complaint I've ever seen is about header files not being able
>to be included by default
Which new packaging system?
You know, the one with multicolor ribbons, a flower-covered basket and a
ladybug bell.
-Artem.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://www.blastwave.org/docs/s10u3_howto.html
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Regarding the former, I see no reason not to include valgrind in
> the Solaris multiverse, once the new packaging system kicks in.
Which new packaging system?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
> roved gcc front-end compatibility in Sun Studio 12,
> but no g++ ABI
> compatibility as of yet. gcc/cc (c compiler) is ABI
> compatible.
...Meaning I can freely link .o files compiled with `cc` and `gcc`?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
57 matches
Mail list logo
