lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze:
> Thanks for your help with that. Tracing out the standalone RLink
> schematic was critically important for that success.
I was happy to help with the developement of OpenOCD (; thx again for
your patch.
BTW - your patch has been commited to r1410 (;
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:57:57PM +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> ok than, I've done some more testing with real RLink this time. the
> results are exactly the same as for Primer1 - so generaly RLink works
> fine now...
Yay! :)
>
> BTW - RLink is pretty slow... compared to my FT2232 based JTA
>
> Freddie reports that it works with the standalone RLink as
> well as the Primer, which what I was going for, so I'd say
> it's ready for submission assuming nobody objects.
>
>
I have committed the patch - we can sort out issues as (and if) we find
them.
Cheers
Spen
___
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:12:43PM -, Spencer Oliver wrote:
>
> > > Asserting SRST via PB5 might work. On both Primers and the
> > standalone
> > > RLink. I may have to end up doing that. It feels wrong,
> > but it may
> > > be the best way. It would remove the need to detect. I am
> > Asserting SRST via PB5 might work. On both Primers and the
> standalone
> > RLink. I may have to end up doing that. It feels wrong,
> but it may
> > be the best way. It would remove the need to detect. I am
> going to
> > pursue this route.
>
> Freddie (and/or anybody else who is
ok than, I've done some more testing with real RLink this time. the
results are exactly the same as for Primer1 - so generaly RLink works
fine now...
BTW - RLink is pretty slow... compared to my FT2232 based JTAG it is
exactly 5 times slower (i compare the time of 100k code upload, same
jtag_k
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:28:30PM +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze:
> > Freddie (and/or anybody else who is interested in this): Please test the
> > attached patch against svn trunk and see if it works properly with an RLink.
>
> for now I can test only wit
lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze:
> Freddie (and/or anybody else who is interested in this): Please test the
> attached patch against svn trunk and see if it works properly with an RLink.
for now I can test only with Primer1, so here it goes.
1. openocd compiles fine
2. openocd starts fi
lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze:
> Freddie (and/or anybody else who is interested in this): Please test the
> attached patch against svn trunk and see if it works properly with an RLink.
damn [; 15 minutes too late [; i'll be able to check that tomorrow.
anyway - about the S/N we were t
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 05:21:59PM -0500, lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> > and is there a need to detect the device after all? can't the other SRST
> > lines be an input on all variants? this way they wouldn't make a
> > BTW what are the chances for SWD support in OpenOCD? <:
>
> I've inquired about that, and the answer was that it might
> show up after 1.0. How soon, I do not know. Actually, I
> think the answer may have been more along the lines of that
> it wouldn't appear before then.
>
> At the ti
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> I've sent you the sch, if the list wants, I can post that here too.
I see. Thanks.
>
> lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze:
> > Weird. I think I might be able (using PB5 for feedback) to figure out
> > whether the adapter i
I've sent you the sch, if the list wants, I can post that here too.
lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze:
> Weird. I think I might be able (using PB5 for feedback) to figure out
> whether the adapter is a standalone RLink or a Primer and change the
> initialization and reset code to do the r
>
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 04:27:23PM +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> >/ ok than, i think i know what the problem is. on the 'full RLink' the
> />/ SRST signal is driven by two lines of ST7 - PA5 and PB5. on Primer1 PA5
> />/ is left unconnected nad PB5 is tied to PA3, which - on real RLink - is
>
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 04:27:23PM +0100, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> ok than, i think i know what the problem is. on the 'full RLink' the
> SRST signal is driven by two lines of ST7 - PA5 and PB5. on Primer1 PA5
> is left unconnected nad PB5 is tied to PA3, which - on real RLink - is RTCK.
Weird. I
Duane Ellis pisze:
> That which comes from legitimate engineering evaluation and examination,
> I believe is perfectly fine.
> ie: If I have it in my hand,and I can reasonably draw a schematic by
> physical examination of the PCB ...
and that is exactly what i did - removed two screws, took out
Freddie>
> i've got the full schematic, but it needs some arranging, cleaning and
> other stuff, so it will be 100% ready in the evening. in the meantime -
> will that be illegal to post that on the list? (; maybe i should send it
> just to Lou, not to the whole list?
>
To be clear: we want noth
Freddie Chopin wrote:
> i've got the full schematic, but it needs some arranging, cleaning and
> other stuff, so it will be 100% ready in the evening. in the meantime -
> will that be illegal to post that on the list? (; maybe i should send it
> just to Lou, not to the whole list?
I *believe* it s
ok than, i think i know what the problem is. on the 'full RLink' the
SRST signal is driven by two lines of ST7 - PA5 and PB5. on Primer1 PA5
is left unconnected nad PB5 is tied to PA3, which - on real RLink - is RTCK.
i've got the full schematic, but it needs some arranging, cleaning and
other stu
lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net pisze:
> Uh-oh. The rlink driver was created based on the schematic for the
> Primer1, which contains an Rlink chip. The standalone Rlink device has
> circuitry that the Primer does not. I made the best guesses I could,
> based on USB traffic traces, to accomo
lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:36:52PM +0100, freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
>> I'm using openocd-0.1.0 for Windows
>>
>> I got the STM32F10X-128k-EVAL board with the original RLink. I can debug the
>> primer1, which has the Rlink embedded. I connect to the cu
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:36:52PM +0100, freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
> I'm using openocd-0.1.0 for Windows
>
> I got the STM32F10X-128k-EVAL board with the original RLink. I can debug the
> primer1, which has the Rlink embedded. I connect to the current board with
> the same command
>
> openoc
>
> timed out while waiting for target halted Runtime error, file
> "command.c", line 456:
>
> The board and the rlink are ok, because they were used with
> succes a few hours ago (in ride7). I will check that anyway
> in a moment.
>
> any ideas what can I do? the debug messages give nothing
I've tried with another RLink (that one is completely new) and it's the same.
I've also tried the primer again and it works completely fine with exactly the
same setup
4\/3!!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
htt
I'm using openocd-0.1.0 for Windows
I got the STM32F10X-128k-EVAL board with the original RLink. I can debug the
primer1, which has the Rlink embedded. I connect to the current board with the
same command
openocd -f interface/rlink.cfg -f board/stm32f10x_128k_eval.cfg
I can connect with no pro
25 matches
Mail list logo
