Andrew Rogers ha scritto:
> Hi All,
>
> I am working a few hours a week trying to get SWD working for the STM32
> Primer2 (R-Link interface). I am happy making changes to the source code
> to accomplish this. The problem is that my changes span many files
> because OpenOCD is pretty well married u
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 21:32 +, Andrew Rogers wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am working a few hours a week trying to get SWD working for the STM32
> Primer2 (R-Link interface). I am happy making changes to the source code
> to accomplish this. The problem is that my changes span many files
> because Op
On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Andrew Rogers wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am working a few hours a week trying to get SWD working for the STM32
> Primer2 (R-Link interface). I am happy making changes to the source code
> to accomplish this. The problem is that my changes span many files
> because OpenOC
Hi All,
I am working a few hours a week trying to get SWD working for the STM32
Primer2 (R-Link interface). I am happy making changes to the source code
to accomplish this. The problem is that my changes span many files
because OpenOCD is pretty well married up to JTAG. I am taking the
opportunity
Dear,
I've purchased a Primer2 device (http://www.stm32circle.com/) but not
before finding out that it only supports Serial Wire Debug (SWD) and not
"normal" JTAG.
After some browsing around, it seems OpenOCD doesn't support SWD (yet).
I did find the following quote:
>SWD is definitely a post-1.0
On Dec 17, 2008, at 1:36 PM, lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net wrote:
I saw this thread in the archives, but wasn't subscribed at the
time, so
I cannot reply directly.
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2008-November/003742.html
It has come to my attention that the STM3
I saw this thread in the archives, but wasn't subscribed at the time, so
I cannot reply directly.
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2008-November/003742.html
It has come to my attention that the STM32 Primer2, while it uses the
same RLink chip that the STM32 Primer does, doesn
On Nov 25, 2008, at 2:55 AM, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
There needs to be a discussion and decision on how to handle, i2c,
spi, swi,
bdi, etc. Possibly this involves merging/using urjtag...
Hacking them in one at a time will become a giant mess...
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.
> What, in your opinion, is the advantage of the SWI?
>
> Does it have some genuine merit over JTAG or is it just different?
>
>
The cortex_m3 has a itm (instruction trace, serial output) that on all
current devices is multiplexed with jtag TMS.
Because of this we need to use swi to access th
andreas> Sorry for all the removed whitespace at the end of lines,
courtesy of Eclipse.
According to the link below, this is an editor preference.
http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.tools.cdt/msg17143.html
___
Openocd-development maili
There needs to be a discussion and decision on how to handle, i2c, spi, swi,
bdi, etc. Possibly this involves merging/using urjtag...
Hacking them in one at a time will become a giant mess...
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash pr
The main motivation for choosing it over jtag is probably using less pins,
as simple as that. There's no gain in debug functionality. Well, if you're
not counting the serial wire viewer, which I'm not sure is a part of swd.
But I believe it's often using a pin otherwise allocated the jtag interface
What, in your opinion, is the advantage of the SWI?
Does it have some genuine merit over JTAG or is it just different?
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-development
13 matches
Mail list logo
