On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Michael Fischer wrote:
> Hello list,
>
>>I would suggest that ft2232.c 1824 is committed to trunk and
>>that the newest version of ft2232.c is split into a series of
>>patches. First commit all the harmless changes, then
>>try to divide thinigs into "real" changes
Øyvind Harboe
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Mai 2009 11:03
An: Michael Fischer
Cc: Openocd-Dev; lun...@mlu.mine.nu
Betreff: Re: [Openocd-development] SAM7S256 is broken by 1825
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Michael Fischer
wrote:
> Hello Øyvind,
>
>>Does svn head work if you use 1824 for
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Michael Fischer wrote:
> Hello Øyvind,
>
>>Does svn head work if you use 1824 for ft2232.c only?
> I have make a new test, copy of the 1872 do not help
> only. I must use the long sequence too:
>
> tms_sequence long
>
> This mean, I must copy the 1824 over the 1872
est regards,
Michael
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: oyvindhar...@gmail.com [mailto:oyvindhar...@gmail.com]im Auftrag
von Øyvind Harboe
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2009 18:11
An: Michael Fischer
Cc: Openocd-Dev
Betreff: Re: [Openocd-development] SAM7S256 is broken by 1825
On Thu, May 21, 2009
üngliche Nachricht-
Von: oyvindhar...@gmail.com [mailto:oyvindhar...@gmail.com]im Auftrag
von Øyvind Harboe
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2009 18:11
An: Michael Fischer
Cc: Openocd-Dev
Betreff: Re: [Openocd-development] SAM7S256 is broken by 1825
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Michael F
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Michael Fischer wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> reference is made to "Strange behavior with r1857 and SAM7S256":
> https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-May/006929.html
>
> The last version which is working is the r1824, the r1825 makes
> the problem
Hello list,
reference is made to "Strange behavior with r1857 and SAM7S256":
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-May/006929.html
The last version which is working is the r1824, the r1825 makes
the problems.
Best regards,
Michael
___
