On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Michael Fischer <fische...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
>>I would suggest that ft2232.c 1824 is committed to trunk and
>>that the newest version of ft2232.c is split into a series of
>>patches. First commit all the harmless changes, then
>>try to divide thinigs into "real" changes.
> But we should use the long sequence as default? In this case
> we have a working solution. And for testing we can enable the
> short sequence and can check step by step which patch breaks the
> functionality.

Good question. You'll have to follow up with the rest of the guys,
I'm out of the office until june 2.


-- 
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://consulting.zylin.com
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to