>Does svn head work if you use 1824 for ft2232.c only?
No, it does not change.
I got a hint from Magnus to disable the following part from ft2232.c:
#if 0
/* This is (or should) be handled in jtag_add_reset */
if ( (cmd->cmd.reset->trst == 1) || ( cmd->cmd.reset->srst &&
(jtag_reset_config & RESET_SRST_PULLS_TRST) ) )
{
tap_set_state(TAP_RESET);
}
#endif
This will solve the SAM7S256 problem, but move the problem
to my LPC2294.
It looks that we have a RESET problem, could it be?
Tested with 1872 here.
Best regards,
Michael
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: oyvindhar...@gmail.com [mailto:oyvindhar...@gmail.com]im Auftrag
von Øyvind Harboe
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2009 18:11
An: Michael Fischer
Cc: Openocd-Dev
Betreff: Re: [Openocd-development] SAM7S256 is broken by 1825
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Michael Fischer <fische...@t-online.de>
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> reference is made to "Strange behavior with r1857 and SAM7S256":
>
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-May/006929.html
>
> The last version which is working is the r1824, the r1825 makes
> the problems.
Does svn head work if you use 1824 for ft2232.c only?
--
Øyvind Harboe
Embedded software and hardware consulting services
http://consulting.zylin.com
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
