On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 18:03 +, John Devereux wrote:
> Zach Welch writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 08:40 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> >> I've read over the branch and improving types is always a good thing,
> >> even if I don't have a specific opinions on whether to use
> >> unsigned or in
Zach Welch writes:
> On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 08:40 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> I've read over the branch and improving types is always a good thing,
>> even if I don't have a specific opinions on whether to use
>> unsigned or int for iteration variables, etc.
>
> There is almost always a correct
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 08:40 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> I've read over the branch and improving types is always a good thing,
>> even if I don't have a specific opinions on whether to use
>> unsigned or int for iteration variables, etc.
>
> T
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 08:40 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> I've read over the branch and improving types is always a good thing,
> even if I don't have a specific opinions on whether to use
> unsigned or int for iteration variables, etc.
There is almost always a correct choice. Most of the time, t
I've read over the branch and improving types is always a good thing,
even if I don't have a specific opinions on whether to use
unsigned or int for iteration variables, etc.
I don't like macros, but I see what you're trying to do here w.r.t. the
arguments for the command handler, so it seems like
Hi all,
I have updated my repo.or.cz repository with the series of patches that
I have been working on. There are a few issues that still need to be
worked out, but it shows what I am doing so others can avoid duplicating
(or "helping") in similar areas. You can view the changes from here:
ht
