>> but i think
>> amt_jtagaccel / common_arm7-9 needs some attention as stepping in arm thumb
>> mode seems to cause invalid instruction traps and is generally pretty
>> unstable.
>
>I think it was Nico who had a bunch of Thumb stepping fixes.
>The quantity made me suspect there were likely more
>> Can anyone verify that this interface is still functional in 0.4 ? Out
>> of 0.4-rc1, 0.3.1 and an old rev.131 fetch only the old rev.131 fetch
>> works to a certain extent. In all cases the openocd was built from
>> source on cygwin with only amt_jtagaccell and parport_give_io enabled
>> in co
>> There appears to be a certain amount of rot in the amt_jtagaccel driver,
>
>That was my conclusion when I noticed, not long ago, that
>it wouldn't even *build* with PPDEV enabled ... an issue
>that's been around for quite some time.
I can post a patch for review of some of the fixups i've done
> Can anyone verify that this interface is still functional in
> 0.4 ? Out of 0.4-rc1, 0.3.1 and an old rev.131 fetch only the
> old rev.131 fetch works to a certain extent. In all cases the
> openocd was built from source on cygwin with only
> amt_jtagaccell and parport_give_io enabled in co
Hi,
Can anyone verify that this interface is still functional in 0.4 ? Out of
0.4-rc1, 0.3.1 and an old rev.131 fetch only the old rev.131 fetch works to a
certain extent. In all cases the openocd was built from source on cygwin with
only amt_jtagaccell and parport_give_io enabled in configure.
