On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> Should every file in the project be converted to TAB width = 4 ?
NO!!!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-devel
Well,
I tried the "workaround" with the following results:
> mwb 0x9555 0x90;mdb 0x9000 0x50
0x9000: 00 20 88 ce 00 01 fb ff 00 42 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
ff ff ff
So writing 0x90 at offset 0x555 from the start of flash address gives
the correct results:
0x20 = ST (manufact
Hi Freddie,
after being slapped in the face by the error, try manually entering the
following:
cd src
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 -D__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO
-I/home/freddie/Pobrane/ftd2xx -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wformat-security
-Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wbad-function-cast
In attachment there is the first patch of the set, compressed.
It just touches the following files:
./BUGS
./NEWS-0.2.0
./NEWTAPS
./PATCHES
./README.Win32
./TODO
./bootstrap
./configure.in
./doc/manual/primer/commands.txt
./doc/manual/release.txt
./doc/manual/server.txt
./doc/openocd.texi
./ecosfla
Hi All,
I have run into trouble with a new board holding the SST 39VF6401B external
flash.
I am working with WinXP and the 0.3.1 installer from Mr. Chopin:
Trying to flash with the OPenOCD I get this error:
target state: halted
target halted in ARM state due to debug-request, current
I agree, that's why I added comment
"If, for any reason, you prefer to not apply this patch on current
rc1, I have no problem to provide an update patch later on."
I already skipped all binary files, and expect patch is safe.
Anyway, I will provide the patch spitted, and let you decide.
Best Rega
Spooky.
How do we *know* that this doesn't subtly break something?
Before 0.4 I would want to break apart this patch and take the
least risky ones, e.g. .c/.h files should be safe enough.
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.ht
On 2009-12-29 16:18, Timo Boettcher wrote:
> openocd-0.4.0-rc1 (git
> from 20091226, 3a84436afb8e1deddffac079573325c6ec3463df).
Upgrade to the most recent version - this has been fixed yesterday.
4\/3!!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-dev
Hi!
I am now switching from openocd-0.3.0-2790 to openocd-0.4.0-rc1 (git
from 20091226, 3a84436afb8e1deddffac079573325c6ec3463df).
On different arm7-cpus (at91sam7x, lpc2148), I get
requesting target halt and executing a soft reset
target state: halted
target halted in ARM state due
Austin, Alex wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
>> development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Øyvind Harboe
>> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 1:09 AM
>> To: Austin, Alex
>> Cc: Laurent Gauch; openocd-development@lis
Pushed.
Thanks!
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@li
11 matches
Mail list logo