lou.openocd...@fixit.nospammail.net wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:36:52PM +0100, freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
>> I'm using openocd-0.1.0 for Windows
>>
>> I got the STM32F10X-128k-EVAL board with the original RLink. I can debug the
>> primer1, which has the Rlink embedded. I connect to the cu
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:36:52PM +0100, freddie_cho...@op.pl wrote:
> I'm using openocd-0.1.0 for Windows
>
> I got the STM32F10X-128k-EVAL board with the original RLink. I can debug the
> primer1, which has the Rlink embedded. I connect to the current board with
> the same command
>
> openoc
Thanks Duane,
I will test your patch this week-end.
Thanks for the input
Greetings
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Duane Ellis wrote:
> Dirk/Kees,
>
> On (3/2) I posted a patch that I believe adds the required functionality
> to openocd = specifically it adds an "endstate" option to the IRSCAN
Dirk/Kees,
On (3/2) I posted a patch that I believe adds the required functionality
to openocd = specifically it adds an "endstate" option to the IRSCAN and
DRSCAN commands.
Specifically to address this comment by Dirk:
Dirk Behme> In [1] Rick proposed
Dirk Behme> "... that the C function for
Pieter Conradie wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> I have found that if the jtag_khz setting is decreased to 1 kHz, then OpenOCD
> behaves better, but it is still not 100%.
>
> I have connected a signal analyser to capture the JTAG signals between
> OpenOCD rev 1399 and an AT91SAM9260 target using a Olimex JTA
>
> timed out while waiting for target halted Runtime error, file
> "command.c", line 456:
>
> The board and the rlink are ok, because they were used with
> succes a few hours ago (in ride7). I will check that anyway
> in a moment.
>
> any ideas what can I do? the debug messages give nothing
Pieter Conradie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have updated the config file naming convention according to all the
> suggestions. Is this better?
>
Yes, thank you for your work.
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https
I've tried with another RLink (that one is completely new) and it's the same.
I've also tried the primer again and it works completely fine with exactly the
same setup
4\/3!!
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
htt
I'm using openocd-0.1.0 for Windows
I got the STM32F10X-128k-EVAL board with the original RLink. I can debug the
primer1, which has the Rlink embedded. I connect to the current board with the
same command
openocd -f interface/rlink.cfg -f board/stm32f10x_128k_eval.cfg
I can connect with no pro
Pieter Conradie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have updated the config file naming convention according to all the
> suggestions. Is this better?
>
Looks good to me.
cu
Michael
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https:
10 matches
Mail list logo